Posts Tagged ‘SF’

An Interview Regarding Dr. Roundbottom

Posted on:

K. Tempest Bradford has inter­viewed me for Fantasy mag­a­zine about my Dr. Roundbottom project. The inter­view is now live here.

K. Tempest Bradford: Did the ini­tial inspi­ra­tion for Dr. Roundbottom start with the pho­tog­ra­phy or with the story?

Jeremiah Tolbert: The work started specif­i­cally in pho­tog­ra­phy. I had an oppor­tu­nity after a week of rain to go out and take some pic­tures of mush­rooms. I started play­ing with some of the images in post, and ended up cre­at­ing my most pop­u­lar pho­to­graph, the eye­ball mush­room. From there, I started writ­ing flash fic­tion around the pho­tog­ra­phy, and Dr. Roundbottom was born.

K. Tempest Bradford: Did the ini­tial inspi­ra­tion for Dr. Roundbottom start with the pho­tog­ra­phy or with the story?

Jeremiah Tolbert: The work started specif­i­cally in pho­tog­ra­phy. I had an oppor­tu­nity after a week of rain to go out and take some pic­tures of mush­rooms. I started play­ing with some of the images in post, and ended up cre­at­ing my most pop­u­lar pho­to­graph, the eye­ball mush­room. From there, I started writ­ing flash fic­tion around the pho­tog­ra­phy, and Dr. Roundbottom was born.

Tempest: How does a typ­i­cal Roundbottom image come about?

Jeremiah: I’m pretty strongly lim­ited by my own sur­round­ings and what I have the capac­ity to pho­to­graph myself. Some of them come from exper­i­ments in pho­to­graphic tech­niques that I want to try out, and some of them come from spe­cific images that I con­ceive and then try and pho­to­graph. Then some just come about as happy dis­cov­er­ies of odd things as I explore my sur­round­ings with cam­era in hand.

For instance, there are not a lot of peo­ple in the Roundbottom pho­tographs at this point because of my lim­ited bud­get and access to period cos­tumes. Luckily, I have leads on some cos­tum­ing resources, so that will change with time as I do more sto­ry­lines for the project. Also, my wife is hard at work sewing a more for­mal Roundbottom cos­tume for myself, and a cos­tume for a female char­ac­ter that’s part of the narrative.

More Thoughts on the Depression of Science Fiction

Posted on:

Charlie Finlay said in the com­ments on the last post that, for the past sev­eral years, every SF novel he’s read has seemed this way, which is why he’s trended towards fan­tasy. So I put some thought into what SF nov­els I had read recently.

The Execution Channel was the most recent one. Holy smokes, was this depress­ing. So it fits the bill. Postsingular seemed a lot more upbeat. In fact, it was the first near-​​future SF any­thing that I’ve read in a while that didn’t men­tion ter­ror­ism. So I haven’t really noticed a trend of depres­sive ele­ments in my most recent read­ing of nov­els, but then, I don’t read a lot of SF novels.

I do know that Gordon has been talk­ing about get­ting a lot more sto­ries about death for a while now. Maybe I’m just now start­ing to see those sto­ries being pub­lished here and there.

It’s odd, because I’ve spent the past cou­ple of years kind of obsessed with death and the after­life, and now that I’m com­ing out of that obses­sion and start­ing to feel bet­ter, I find death all over the place in my read­ing. Was it that com­mon of a theme before? Not sure. I don’t remem­ber it being so, but it’s prob­a­bly a mat­ter of my changed per­spec­tive as much as any­thing else.

Some ques­tions.

1. Does any­one know how rel­a­tively opti­mistic the SF pub­lished in China is?

2. I don’t read Baen’s–are they more upbeat?

3. Do you think British writ­ers have been more prone to depres­sive stuff since their own ter­ror­ist attacks recently?

4. Is there a need for upbeat SF? Not nec­es­sar­ily more pos­i­tive, but maybe less, well, grim?

On the Merits of Asking What You Hate (or Love)

Posted on:

Jason Stoddard has asked “What do you Hate Most about SF Short Fiction?”. I must say, I was dis­ap­pointed with the responses. There’s no con­sis­tency among the com­ments, just like there’s no con­sis­tency in the tastes of any large, diverse audi­ence. I haven’t got­ten to read the Something Awful responses yet, but I am look­ing for­ward to see­ing if they are more use­ful to me as a writer than “Put in more robots” and “too much char­ac­ter devel­op­ment” (a com­ment quickly fol­lowed by some­one com­plain­ing about too lit­tle char­ac­ter development).I kind of hoped a pat­tern would emerge, that we would diag­nose the prob­lem that every­one is so sure is there, because of the num­bers. We’re like doc­tors hud­dled around a comatose patient we believe to be dying because of the mon­i­tors, each shout­ing their own diag­no­sis. We’ll never come to any kind of con­clu­sion because it’s all a mat­ter of opin­ion. And you know what? I’m sick of opin­ion. Give me infor­ma­tion, sto­ries, humor, not opin­ions. Anything but those. Everyone has one, and every­one is always wrong.* As an aggre­gate. Being sick of opin­ion prob­a­bly means I am suf­fer­ing blog burnout. Anyway–

What I am begin­ning to hate most about short SF is its inces­sant need to talk about itself. If I put half as much energy into talk­ing about it and think­ing about it, I prob­a­bly would have got­ten a damn novel writ­ten by now.

I’m just going to shut up and write now.

*Exceptions made for Nick Mamatas and David Moles.

To Save SF Short Fiction, We Had to Destroy It

Posted on:

(Warning, the below is poorly thought out and writ­ten hastily. I will write more later this week.)
Doug Cohen has recently launched a sub­scribe to a SF mag­a­zine drive via his Livejournal.

I have a sus­pi­cion that telling the SF writ­ing blo­gos­phere to sub­scribe to short fic­tion mag­a­zines in an effort to save short fic­tion is like instruct­ing a bunch of buggy whip mak­ers to buy buggy whips to save the buggy whip man­u­fac­tur­ing indus­try.  I know Doug means well, and I don’t mean this as a crit­i­cism of him, but I am very doubt­ful that telling a small group of active online fan­dom to sub­scribe to mag­a­zines will make a bit of dif­fer­ence in the gen­eral decline.   I’ve been just as guilty

The gorilla in the room that we rarely acknowl­edge is that nobody wants to read short fic­tion.  If they did, then there wouldn’t be this mess. I’ve heard and read hand wav­ing about the changes in dis­tri­b­u­tion mod­els, but hon­estly, I don’t buy it.  In this day and age, if you have a burn­ing desire to read sci­ence fic­tion short sto­ries, you can Google up a mag­a­zine in less than a second.

Do I think that the pub­lic could be mar­keted towards to encour­age the read­ing of more short fic­tion? Maybe.  A good mar­ket­ing team can sell just about any­thing.  Do I think any­one has the money to back a large cam­paign like this?  No.  SFWA would be the only orga­ni­za­tion that I could see such an ini­tia­tive com­ing from, and they’re a mas­sive joke; an orga­ni­za­tion ded­i­cated to inter­nal pol­i­tics and rumor­mon­ger­ing more than the decline and col­lapse of the indus­try around it.

There is no solu­tion.  The public’s inter­est has moved on.  If you’re a writer, go write video games, movies, tele­vi­sion, or books, in that order of pop­u­lar­ity.  That is where the public’s inter­est is right now, and if you don’t like it, then I’m afraid that you should prob­a­bly get used to the idea that short fic­tion is a small, niche hobby of lit­tle impor­tance.  I’m fine with that.  I find that I enjoy writ­ing it, and that’s enough for me.  Short fic­tion for me is a way to learn writ­ing, but I won’t regret leav­ing it behind if I were to crack another (more pop­u­lar and bet­ter pay­ing) medium, or find some amal­gam of sev­eral of my own.

I don’t sup­port the record indus­try for its fail­ing busi­ness model. I don’t think the SF print mag­a­zine world deserve spe­cial treat­ment either.  I do, in fact sub­scribe to quite a few mag­a­zines.  But it’s not out of any effort to save them from the dust­bin. There’s plenty to read online, and will be as long as weirdos like me keep writ­ing it.

I’ve been around and around the fund­ing mod­els for online mag­a­zines in my head.  I’ve con­cocted the most ridicu­lous Web 2.0 mod­els for online pub­lish­ing that you can imag­ine.  But none of them will work, because there’s no evi­dence what-​​so-​​ever that there is enough pub­lic inter­est to jus­tify the build­ing of such a thing.  Every model fails, because there just aren’t enough peo­ple inter­ested in read­ing and sup­port­ing a mag­a­zine mon­e­tar­ily for it to even sus­tain itself.   Don’t quote Strange Horizons at me, either.  Their fund drive doesn’t seem to be doing too well this time around.

Science Fiction, meet the long tail.  It’s not the first, and it won’t be the last.

Why I hate Elves, Dwarves, Dragons, and…

Posted on:

(This is a very tongue-​​in-​​cheek entry.)

It’s no secret to reg­u­lar read­ers that I loathe so-​​called generic fan­tasy. And it is generic, in a very supermarket-​​product sense. Generic fan­tasy is a pale imi­ta­tion of some­one else’s orig­i­nal prod­uct. It is the yel­low box that says CEREAL on the bot­tom shelf.

Most generic fan­tasy is whole­sale intel­lec­tual thiev­ery from J.R.R. Tolkien. Yes, he him­self built his world based on mythol­ogy, and I am aware that one of his goals was to cre­ate a mythol­ogy for England. But that does not earn lazy authors any points with me if they write using his basic world-​​building ele­ments. I don’t care if your elves are doing some­thing non­tra­di­tional, like build­ing and rac­ing high per­for­mance race cars. I don’t care if they are detec­tives, paired up with a gruff but lov­able dwarf who chomps cig­ars and quips about unsolved cases. You’re still rely­ing mostly on the hard work that Tolkien did for your char­ac­ter­i­za­tion and world building.

Stop being so lazy and make up your own worlds! China Mieville, you get an A from me. Even if I didn’t like Un Lun Dun very much (under­stand­able, being a children’s book).

The same goes for you bloody adults that read this stuff. It’s for­giv­able in the habits of a D&D play­ing teenager, but you should know bet­ter. You’re delib­er­ately impov­er­ish­ing your brain by read­ing this stuff. Put down the Robert Jordan and back away slowly. The Sword of Shanara has been read plenty enough times. Terry Brooks, you have your money. Let’s lock all the copies in a big vault and for­get about it for a few centuries.

It’s got­ten to the point where I can’t even see Tolkien’s work clearly. I am sure he did some­thing impres­sive and new, once upon a time, but I can­not view his work with­out look­ing through the lens cre­ated by the garbage that has fol­lowed it. I might have been a fan if I hadn’t been exposed to every­thing that came after­wards. I do enjoy the Hobbit, I guess, but it’s by no means my favorite fan­tasy novel.

I guess what I am try­ing to say is, if you write and sell a book that involves a reluc­tant, small-​​sized hero being tasked to steal some­thing for the Bigger Folk and fac­ing Mighty Danger, receiv­ing help along the way from the lithe, tall, and earthy peo­ple with pointed ears and high chin bones, it gives me the right to punch you in the gonads. You have been warned.

Now I’m off to write up that dwarf-​​and-​​elf-​​they-​​solve-​​crime! story.

Not Science Fiction

Posted on:

Not Science Fiction

I have, of recent, become a total fan­boy for SF Author Maureen McHugh.  I loved her sto­ries pub­lished in SciFiction, but the real tip­ping point for me has been her blog­ging. Today, she made a great post about Michael Chabon’s The Yiddish Policemen’s Union and her own label for the genre of fic­tion that has been labeled stren­u­ously by the authors and pub­lish­ers, Not Science Fiction.

I love this term for it’s double-​​sidedness.  If you’re inclined, you can take the term lit­er­ally. If SF scares you, then the term is a com­fort. “There, there,” the pub­lisher coos softly.  “There is no Nerd Schmutz on this fine, fine book.”    But if you like SF and you have a sense of humor about these genre wars, then you can take it to mean that you will like it as SF despite what any­one says.  It’s like a secret hand­shake.  I say we make it Official.

PS: I guess I should read this book, huh? With endorse­ments from McHugh and Moles, I can’t go wrong.

Nine Reasons I Read Science Fiction

Posted on:

Nine Reasons I Read Science Fiction

1. Neophilia.

Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea intro­duced the idea of neophilia to me in their great con­spir­acy the­ory mag­num opus, The Illuminatus Trilogy. Hagbard Celine, the half-​​Atlantian Discordian sub­ma­rine cap­tain describes the world as being divided into two types of peo­ple– neophiles and neo­phobes; those who are attracted by the new, and those who are repelled by it. I read this book when I was six­teen. I imme­di­ately rec­og­nized myself as a neophile. Science fic­tion writ­ers gen­er­ally attempt to show things that have never been seen before in their work. There is a tra­di­tion of the orig­i­nal within it. If there is a genre of fic­tion that can be described as neophillic, it is sci­ence fic­tion.

2. To chal­lenge my preconceptions.

I grew up in Kansas, which if you read the news at all, is a state where peo­ple are gen­er­ally very con­ser­v­a­tive. Racism is ram­pant. Homophobia was, at least when I was a child, the gen­eral rule. And if you weren’t Christian, then you were going to Hell. It is easy to accept all of these beliefs as fact when you are immersed in them. Even if you don’t agree with them, they find a way to seep into your mind. In that envi­ron­ment, sci­ence fic­tion, with it’s unusual and pro­gres­sive views about gen­der, race, sex, and reli­gion pro­vides an escape, and an alter­nate view point. Ursula K. LeGuin alone chal­lenged much of my pre­con­cep­tions in her work. Whether it was the peo­ple of color in the Earthsea books, or chal­leng­ing the idea of gen­der in The Left Hand of Darkness, her work opened up my mind to a world where cul­tural ideas are not hegemonic.

3. To travel to exotic places with­out leav­ing the house.

Science fic­tion is often set in places that no human being has ever vis­ited before. I love to travel, and with enough time, I could one day see much of what Earth has to offer. And I don’t think there is any sub­sti­tute for get­ting up and actu­ally going to the places. But some places are beyond the reach of a jet plane. Without sci­ence fic­tion, I would never know or imag­ine what the skies of Venus are like, never feel the breeze of an alien wind across my skin, or feel the dread as a small alien space­craft full of humans slips over the event hori­zon of a black hole. Science fic­tion inspires us to push this bound­ary of the lim­its of travel. I know more now about the sur­face of Mars than I could have expected to, ten years ago. I would bet that it was partly sci­ence fic­tion that inspired the NASA sci­en­tists to build the Mars rovers that gave me this knowledge.

4. To be pre­pared for pos­si­ble future.

1984. Fahrenheit 451. These are no longer fic­tion, they’re prac­ti­cally mod­ern day sur­vival guides. Science fic­tion pre­pares us for the “what ifs” of the future. Science fic­tion read­ers as a group are more pre­pared for what comes. We’ve been con­sid­er­ing the chal­lenges and moral dilem­mas of stem cells and cloning long before any­one else. The Singularity may be com­ing, and if any­one will be pre­pared for it, it will be the read­ers and writ­ers of sci­ence fiction.

5. To escape the mundane.

Because I need adven­ture and excite­ment and stim­u­la­tion! I work a desk job. I spend 48+ weeks a year in the same 100 mile square area. I see the same peo­ple, do the same tasks, and walk or drive the same streets day in, day out. Life is repet­i­tive. Science fic­tion allows me to escape that. I don’t want to read about peo­ple who have bor­ing jobs and rela­tion­ship prob­lems with their spouses. I want to read about things that stir sur­prise and amaze­ment in me–what we call sen­sawunda. I don’t get sen­sawunda from my day to day life very often. When I do, it’s a bless­ing. But I know that if I turn to my book shelf, I can get a hefty dose of it any time I want.

6. Because I care about plot.

Science fic­tion sto­ries often deal with Big Things. Saving the world. Saving the uni­verse, even. Plot seems to be more empha­sized in sci­ence fic­tion than it is in other gen­res, and it tends to have a larger scope. The stakes are higher. In the pro­to­typ­i­cal lit­er­ary story, the stakes are a col­lege professor’s mar­riage. Yawn. I want some­thing big on the line. I want schemes from my vil­lains, where the stake is noth­ing less than every­thing the pro­tag­o­nists hold dear. Little sto­ries are nice, from time to time, but its the big sto­ries that hold my atten­tion the best. And sci­ence fic­tion offers those.

7. To learn science.

Reading isn’t just about fun. I like it best when I read fic­tion that teaches me some­thing use­ful along with enter­tain­ing me. I find two gen­res par­tic­u­larly excel at this; his­tor­i­cal fic­tion and sci­ence fic­tion. I love sci­ence for the way it makes sense of the world in a log­i­cal man­ner. And you could argue that some sci­ence fic­tion is really just his­tor­i­cal fic­tion about the future. Both can occa­sion­ally pro­vide life lessons. One is from pre­vi­ous exam­ples and the other from theoretical.

8. Because it’s dan­ger­ous to like it.

Everybody has their way of being dif­fer­ent. For me, it’s being a SF nut. This got me picked on more than a few times in my child­hood. It gets me sneered upon by lit­er­ary writ­ers who hang out at the cof­fee shops around town. To some peo­ple, being a sci­ence fic­tion writer means I am lower on the totem pole than a garbage man. I like that. I don’t have much rebel in me, but I like tak­ing plea­sure in things that those kinds of peo­ple hate.

9. Because it offers hope.

Not all sci­ence fic­tion, but a great deal of it, has offered hope. Hope that the future can be bet­ter than the present. At times, it has fetishized the idea of progress, but when it is at its best, it can give hope to the lowli­est soul that their life, or their children’s lives could be bet­ter than it is today. Yes, there is a great tra­di­tion of dystopia fic­tion in the genre, but I would argue that dystopias are writ­ten from a posi­tion of optimism–that per­haps, if the author lays out their dystopian vision, the world can avoid it. Dystopian writ­ers see some­thing that could go wrong and warn against it. Even this is opti­mistic to me and offers hope.

I am not usu­ally a cheer­leader for sci­ence fic­tion. I think there can be some very bad things about it and its fan­dom. I do not believe that sci­ence fic­tion fans are bet­ter than any­one else. That is not what this post is about. It is about why I per­son­ally con­tinue to read sci­ence fic­tion today, twenty years after I dis­cov­ered my first Anne McCaffery book. I encour­age you to think about why you read sci­ence fic­tion too. Sometimes, we all need a reminder. I know that I did.

10 Things Your Website Should Have if You Are An Author

Posted on:

1. Your own domain name.

In this day an age, a domain costs almost noth­ing, and host­ing, not much more. I charge $15 a year for a domain and $20 a year for host­ing for my clients, and there might be cheaper (but less feature-​​rich) host­ing avail­able out there. Sff​.net might have been cool a decade ago, but it’s not now. It just looks unpro­fes­sional. Buy a domain, and if you can, make it your full pub­lish­ing name. If you can’t, don’t get too clever, by which I mean don’t pick some­thing you’re going to hate 10 years from now. Domain names can be changed, but you should really try to avoid it, to pre­serve your rat­ings in the search engines.

2. A biog­ra­phy and bib­li­og­ra­phy with lots and lots of links.

If some­one is com­ing to your web­site, it is likely that they want to know who you are, and what else you’ve done. Don’t be stingy here. Don’t pub­li­cize any­thing you’re embar­rassed of, such as that mpreg slash fic that you wrote late one night while drunk, but def­i­nitely include your bib­li­og­ra­phy, and if your story is avail­able online, for free in a webzine or for sale in some form, link to it. If you don’t, you’re miss­ing a chance for a sale to a poten­tial fan.

3. A News Blog with an RSS feed. Or a newslet­ter. Or both.

Note that I said a News Blog. Writer blogs are great enter­tain­ment, but they are noto­ri­ously clut­tered with non­sense quizzes, word counts, whin­ing, and so much other crap that find­ing out when an author you like has a story com­ing out can be harder than it should. Maintain a clean weblog that is sim­ply for announc­ing your sales, appear­ances, and other pro­fes­sional items of inter­est. Don’t use it to post pic­tures of your cats. I’m an RSS feed man myself, and I think they are the future, but per­haps you should do an email mail­ing list as well. Post the same con­tent to both, but make sure it’s clear that they are the same infor­ma­tion, so your fans don’t sign up for both and get irri­tated for receiv­ing dupli­cate information.

4. A pro­fes­sional design

This isn’t cheap, but if you are a pro­fes­sional author, you owe it to your­self to hire a designer who can build you some­thing nice and main­tain­able. Tony Greer does great work. Tobias Buckell’s web­site is a model exam­ple of this list. I work fairly afford­ably myself, and you may inquire for rates if you’re inter­ested. But seri­ously, your nephew who has a copy of Front Page 2000 isn’t going to be good enough. Spend a lit­tle money on it, and you’re going to have bet­ter results. People buy books based on cov­ers, and they’re going to judge you by how pro­fes­sional and fresh your design is as well.

5. Full sto­ries and/​or nov­els. Possibly excerpts.

Free sam­ples have been used in mar­ket­ing since the inven­tion of cap­i­tal­ism. Writers and other intel­lec­tual prop­erty cre­ators are often ter­ri­fied of this, and admit­tedly, there’s a risk that all your stuff will be stolen and you will be left pen­ni­less. If you’re lucky! Someone who comes to your web­site may not have read any­thing you have writ­ten. Post a story from a year or two. If you’re brave, put it in the Creative Commons as soon as you can. That might limit resale rights, but chalk it up as a mar­ket­ing expense. I’m not going to go into the Creative Commons too much here, as Cory Doctorow does it bet­ter than any­one else. Let me just say that I agree with him, but I under­stand those who don’t, and I don’t think this will make or break you. But try it out, and see what hap­pens. It worked for Peter Watts!

6. A way to buy your work.

Post links to Amazon, Fictionwise, what­ever. Make them promi­nent. If you have work in print for sale, it should be easy for me to buy it. Somebody really has to make this as easy as iTunes. But that’s a topic for another issue. Link, link, and link again.

7. A way to con­tact you.

Boo, spam! Nobody likes spam, but if you don’t have a way for fans or poten­tial pub­lish­ers to con­tact you, you’re miss­ing out on fan mail, hate mail, and pos­si­ble sales. There are javascript tricks you can use, or you can set up a spe­cific email address that you check on a reg­u­lar basis. You really should have this email address be at your domain above, too. Even if it for­wards to your gmail account. It’s a mat­ter of per­cep­tion. If you own a domain, and you should, use it for your email.

8. A Press Kit

I was run­ning out of ideas, so I stole this one from Tobias Buckell’s page. Short story authors prob­a­bly don’t need press kits, but nov­el­ists might. Photos, book cov­ers, and any­thing else that makes a reporter’s job eas­ier when he wants to report on your work is a very good thing.

9. A Goodies Section

I have seri­ous doubts about peo­ple lov­ing books so much that they want desk­top wall­pa­per, icons, and such, but hey, if it doesn’t cost you any­thing to make them or have them made by a designer, why not? Little rewards like this don’t cost much, but they might be just the edge you need to start a buzz about your lat­est work.Think out­side the box here. I’m hes­i­tant to give this idea away, but if your read­er­ship is young and nerdy, con­sider pub­lish­ing D&D gam­ing stats for your char­ac­ters and cre­ations. Make it easy and allow­able for your fans to play in your world. They’re not going to make any money off of it, so don’t worry. It stopped being yours when you pub­lished it.

10. Something nobody else has tried.

See the idea about about D&D stats. Do some­thing like that. Do some­thing wild and new. It’s a tough world out there for writ­ers. There are a lot of us, and I wish I could say that the best writ­ers win. But mar­ket­ing money has a direct effect on sales. If you’re read­ing this and giv­ing it seri­ous con­sid­er­a­tion, then there’s a good chance that your pub­lisher doesn’t have any mar­ket­ing bucks for you. That means you need to take mat­ters into your own hands. A web­site with all the fea­tures I’ve described above costs any­where from $300-$500 from me. It could cost you thou­sands from other, equally qual­i­fied design­ers, but no mat­ter what, if you do it right, and you give it time, you’re going to make your money back. I won’t guar­an­tee it, but it’s bet­ter than noth­ing at all!

5 Things I don’t rec­om­mend doing:

  1. Featuring your photo promi­nently in the design.
  2. Posting your daily word counts and/​or in-​​depth analy­sis of your daily work. This is inter­est­ing to other writ­ers. Probably not so much to fans, unless they want to be a writer too. Keep a sep­a­rate blog for this.
  3. Your rejec­tions. I’ve ranted about this before. Posting about your rejec­tions is some­thing you should stop doing. I can under­stand why you might do it, but keep it pri­vate. You might say some­thing you regret. Editors read web­sites too.
  4. Excerpts of unpub­lished work. Sorry, nobody cares unless you’re super-​​established and semi-​​famous.  That’s not to say you shouldn’t release the whole thing online if you want.
  5. Bad reviews. I’ve not read books because of the bad reviews their own authors have pub­li­cized. If you don’t link them, I won’t hear about them. This is con­tentious, but I just don’t rec­om­mend it personally.

One last thing. I haven’t been fol­low­ing my own advice here, but you can be sure that after this, I will be, both for myself and for any future clients.

10 Writing Rules You Should Break and Why

Posted on:

When you start writ­ing, you cling to rules.  Rules take this great sea of pos­si­bil­i­ties and attempt to turn them into a river that flows in one direc­tion.  They’re not nec­es­sar­ily bad ideas, but you can gain as much from break­ing them as you can by fol­low­ing them.  Here are a few writ­ing “rules” and rules of liv­ing a writ­ing life that I have heard and the rea­sons I have rebelled against them.  Particularly, I come at these as a writer of sci­ence fic­tion and fan­tasy, so your results may dif­fer from the pic­ture on the box.

1.  Write what you know.

This rule should be “draw from your per­sonal expe­ri­ences.” I imag­ine as told orig­i­nally, that’s what it meant, but some begin­ning writ­ers take this to mean that they should only write work set in places they have been, about peo­ple they know, and so on.  As some­one who has set sto­ries in the Himalayas (never been there), East Africa (been there), and the outer orbit of the solar sys­tem (never been there, except that one time, long story), well… some­times, we write about things we want to know, not just the things we already know.  A book is the eas­i­est way to travel with­out going some­where.  There shouldn’t be a rule exclud­ing the writer from trav­el­ing through their writ­ing too.

2. Don’t try to force devel­op­ing your voice.

You don’t have time to let your voice develop nat­u­rally.  The world is full of writ­ers, maybe more than ever before.  Everyone you know is work­ing on a book.  If they say they aren’t, they’re lying.  Writing is a hell of a lot bet­ter of a job than dig­ging ditches or flip­ping burg­ers, so of course every­one wants to be a writer, and every­one thinks they have some­thing to say.  Having some­thing to say is impor­tant, but if you’re going to stand out these days, you need to find a unique way to say it.  Get a voice, and get it quick.  It doesn’t mat­ter how.  You need to find a way to remove your­self from the horde of 20/​30-​​something white nerds who want to write sci­ence fic­tion.  Or what­ever your group is, if you’re not me.  I don’t want peo­ple to say, “Jeremiah Tolbert? He’s like, Cory Doctorow, only dumber, right?”   Don’t be like some­one else.  Be you, but if you is bor­ing, and you really want to make it, change who you are.  We are not all orig­i­nal snowflakes, but we can pre­tend to be.  Self-​​trepanation is not rec­om­mended, but it might not hurt.

3.  Omit need­less words.

Yes, fine, some words can be removed to strengthen a sen­tence, but some writ­ers will take this too far, to the point of turn­ing every nar­ra­tor into the same per­son.  Word choice plays a large part in the voice of a char­ac­ter.  If you take this rule to the extreme, you neuter your writ­ing.  Verbal tics are okay.  Bloated prose is not.  Unless your nar­ra­tor likes bloated prose.  But that’s hard to pull off and look like you meant to do it.

4. Don’t take rejec­tions per­son­ally.

This is like telling peo­ple to stop breath­ing or to stop lov­ing their par­ents.  I sup­pose if you’re the kind of per­son who just can’t let some­thing go, then maybe you should find another career, but every writer takes rejec­tions per­son­ally.  Don’t believe them if they say they don’t.  The trick is get­ting over it quickly. And for God’s sake, stop post­ing on your blog about every rejec­tion you get.  Nobody cares.  Hardly any­body cares when you get an accep­tance either.  They will con­grat­u­late you, but that’s only because they want you to con­grat­u­late them when they sell to Hentai Slash Fic Online for half a cent a word and a bagel.    Editors aren’t just reject­ing your story.  They’re reject­ing you and your work. If you’re going to keep writ­ing like that, yeah, they don’t want to see any­thing else you willl write either.   It hurts.  Nothing can be done about it except for you to stop suck­ing so much.  So get to work.

5. Don’t blog so much. Write more.

Blog as much as you want.  Just don’t expect any­one to read it.  If you had to be doing some­thing besides blog­ging, I don’t think it should be writ­ing more fic­tion. You should be read­ing more.  Read the instruc­tion man­ual to your blender.  Read cereal boxes.  Read trashy romance nov­els, and read the clas­sics.  Read 400 blogs and news web­sites.  Write when you have some­thing to say, and a new way to say it.  Writing more is going to help you espe­cially when you are start­ing out, but after a cer­tain point, you’re bor­der­ing on hyper­graphia, and that’s a men­tal ill­ness, sorry, not a career.  In gen­eral, stop beat­ing your­self up about how much you do or don’t write.  Live your god damn life, and the writ­ing will come.  Or it won’t.  Nobody will care but you.

6. Kill your darlings.

Some peo­ple take this as an imper­a­tive to be harsh in your edit­ing.  Other peo­ple take it as a com­mand to mur­der your char­ac­ters.   If it’s a dar­ling to you, it might actu­ally, you know, be good writ­ing.  Find a way to kill the bor­ing dri­vel and keep the dar­lings.  But yes, I  agree that you should mur­der your char­ac­ters. Murder every sin­gle one of them, so long as it’s inter­est­ing to do so.

7. Get rid of your TV.

Do you know why it’s so hard to moti­vate your­self to write?  It’s not because your life is full of dis­trac­tions like TV and video games.  It’s a lack of con­crete rewards.  Most peo­ple roll out of bed and go straight to work, and they don’t have to get rid of their tele­vi­sion or inter­net access to be able to do it.  That’s because they know there’s a pay­check com­ing at the end of the period.  Writing, unless you’re already suc­cess­ful, is on spec.   You do the work and then you hope some­one wants to buy it.  The solu­tion isn’t to get rid of your tele­vi­sion.  Even the most pro­lific writ­ers need to rest and relax some­times.  The solu­tion is to make writ­ing the reward itself. Challenge your­self with each piece.  You have to find it ful­fill­ing on the page before any­one else sees it. Selling the piece and see­ing it pub­lished should be a bonus.

I almost wrote “icing on the cake” here but to hell with cake with­out icing.  That’s just a spongy bread. Screw that.

8.  Never sub­mit a first draft.

Sometimes you nail it.  I’ve sold first drafts.  You will too.  The mis­take here is think­ing that all the work in writ­ing hap­pens on the page.  At my guess, it’s about 20% of it.  The rest goes on before you even sit down.

9.  Always sub­mit your first draft.

I for­get who said this.  Heinlein?  Screw that guy.  Nobody always nails it.  When your name car­ries a cer­tain amount of pres­tige in your field, you might be able to sell every first draft, but do you really want to do that?  Do you really want work out there, cir­cu­lat­ing, that you know isn’t the best you could have done?  Do you have that lit­tle pas­sion for what you do that you just can’t be both­ered?  Then read on to rule 10.

10. Don’t Give Up.

There should be a lot more giv­ing up in the world of writ­ing.  If you can be encour­aged to quit writ­ing and find a more lucra­tive pro­fes­sion, like, say, clean­ing toi­lets, then do so.  You’ll save your­self a lot of heart­break and rejec­tion.  And you make room for the rest of us who are psy­chot­i­cally obses­sive about “break­ing in” to mar­kets that pay the same thing they paid in 1952.

I mean all of the above with the upmost love and respect, of course.

SF Magazines: Financial Models

Posted on:

For my own ben­e­fit as much as any­thing else, I’d like to run through the mod­els that I am aware of that can be used to finan­cially sup­port a magazine–whether it is a print or an elec­tronic mag­a­zine. Here’s what I got. If I miss any, please let me know and I will con­tinue to update this. These are not mutu­ally exclu­sive. Many mag­a­zines use a com­bi­na­tion of these.

Subscription/​Pay Model

Giving the con­tent in return for a sub­scrip­tion fee or a cover price. Generally sell­ing a bun­dle of stories/​content. Example: tra­di­tional print magazines.

Advertising Model

Selling access to your read­ers to adver­tis­ers, and plac­ing their adver­tis­ing among your con­tent. Example: most tra­di­tional print mag­a­zines sell adver­tis­ing as well.

Patron Model

Supported by a sin­gle per­son or small pri­vate group of peo­ple from pri­vate funds. Example: The Fortean Bureau was pri­mar­ily our pri­vate money. (If you ever donated? You are my hero).

Donation/​Fund Drive model

The NPR model, as I’ve heard it referred to. Regular requests for funds from read­ers, with no set amount. Example: Strange Horizons is the most suc­cess­ful exam­ple of this. I believe Escape Pod does this as well, but I haven’t seen any fund dri­ves from them.

Full Site Sponsorship

A sin­gle cor­po­rate entity, for what­ever rea­son, sub­si­dizes the mag­a­zine. Example: SCIFICTION. I seem to think Chizine as well?

Premium Content

Special access to spe­cial con­tent. A kind of sub­scrip­tion model. I’m not sure about this one, what do you guys think? Is it dif­fer­ent enough? Example: Salon used to do this, but I am not sure if they do anymore.These mod­els are irrel­e­vant as to whether a mag­a­zine is non­profit, hobby, or for-​​profit. Many of these mod­els are con­sid­ered fail­ures. Which ones do you think work or don’t? Perhaps the best solu­tion for a sus­tain­able mag­a­zine (online or off) would be a com­bi­na­tion of 3 or more?

I am not sure that the sub­scrip­tion model is work­ing very well any­more. As Chance pointed out in the com­ments of the Triad post yes­ter­day, com­par­ing Escape Pod to the Triad isn’t a good com­par­i­son because Escape Pod doesn’t have a cost to sub­scribe. I argued that just because the one has a dif­fer­ent model for sup­port than the other doesn’t mean that they can’t be com­pared as “mag­a­zines” with readerships.

Steve, I know you some­times read this– could you tell me or pro­vide me a link to where you might talk more about the fund­ing model behind Escape Pod? Chance argues that Escape Pod is your hobby, as another rea­son that the sub­scriber num­bers can’t be com­pared. I’d like to know more about how Escape Pod affords to func­tion, if you’re com­fort­able talk­ing about it.