Posts Tagged ‘jetse’

Art Is About the Lonliness of Sentience, Especially SF

Posted on:

f you haven’t read it already, I rec­om­mend you go check out Jetse de Vries’ story in Clarkeworld today, “Qubit Conflicts.” I am kind of spoil­ing part of it here in this post, so if you are against that kind of thing, go read the story and then come back here.Interesting, wasn’t it? I like the uncon­ven­tional sto­ries, that take risks with not hav­ing con­ven­tional char­ac­ters and sto­ry­lines. I can’t write them, but I love read­ing them. Anyway, the end­ing of this story, I think, could be read as an inter­est­ing response to some of the ideas of Mundane SF. And it gets to some­thing that I am only just now pick­ing up on, which is maybe what pur­pose art serves and why we cre­ate art at all.

The end of the story has this super intel­li­gent sin­gu­lar­ity AI remark­ing on how maybe it was a mis­take to set a think­ing pace so fast (Planck speed), and ulti­mately how lonely it is, wait­ing for aliens to con­tact it. And it got me think­ing about some­thing I read recently, a quote of the late great Kurt Vonnegut, about how every being needs to be reminded that they are not alone, that there are oth­ers like them out there.

I think there’s some­thing inher­ent about the nature of our sen­tience that brings along a cer­tain lone­li­ness. I can’t quite put my fin­ger on why being able to think and being self-​​aware means that we pine for the minds of oth­ers, to know them, but we do. Maybe it’s a side effect of being the evo­lu­tion­ary end prod­uct of a social species. Maybe a sen­tient soli­tary preda­tor wouldn’t have this prob­lem, and it’s only a pecu­liar side effect of our own sen­tience. But any sen­tient cre­ations of ours will have this prob­lem, as Jetse seems to con­vey. I think I agree with that. Their intel­li­gence, while arti­fi­cial, will be mod­eled after ours. And we def­i­nitely seem to be lonely, every one of us, and I think we cre­ate and con­sume art because it soothes that fear that we’re alone. We get to, through a com­plex invented sys­tem thou­sands of years in the mak­ing, enter the mind of another being. No mat­ter what the nar­ra­tive is, there is that, in the back­ground, that comfort.

And SF takes that them and makes it explicit in tales of the extrater­res­trial. Fantasy does the same thing. Honestly, I don’t find SF/​F that com­pletely rules out the idea of the Other Mind very sat­is­fy­ing. It can be com­pelling and enter­tain­ing, but aliens and elves and all of it, they are a salve that we have invented to soothe a pain of which we’re barely aware.

Oh no. What if our species is the Emo Kid of the Galactic Lunchroom?

Jetse de Vries on What Should be Left Unsaid in Fiction

Posted on:

Jetse de Vries on What Should be Left Unsaid in Fiction

Jetse of Interzone has made a post talk­ing about the bal­ance of answered vs. unan­swered ques­tions in fiction.

This is an attempt to pin­point one of the things that makes a story res­onate: that is, one of those qual­i­ties that makes a story stay with the reader long after she/​he has fin­ished read­ing it. I’m aim­ing at what should be left unsaid in a story.

Different read­ers are going to want dif­fer­ent things out of a story. One thing I used to get burned on in crits was that every­one wanted more, but the “more” that they wanted, background-​​wise, was dif­fer­ent. I think as a writer, I end up try­ing to focus on only what is imme­di­ately impor­tant to the story, and then let­ting the reader fill in the rest. On my Kansas Jayhawk vs. The Midwest Monster Squad story pub­lished in Interzone, one of the fun things some of my reader friends did was come up with the daikaiju mon­ster mas­cots for other states. That’s the kind of reader par­tic­i­pa­tion I whole-​​heartedly endorse.