Posts Tagged ‘design’

Labeling Oneself as an Artist and Why I Have Avoided It

Posted on:

I’ve strongly resisted the label of artist for a long time, because I don’t feel wor­thy of it, on the one hand, and on the other hand, to avoid the neg­a­tive con­no­ta­tions that are entwined with the label in my back­wards, red­neck brain.

Who is an artist? (the ingrained notions)

Here’s what I grew up think­ing of artists–not actively think­ing or delib­er­ately decid­ing to believe, but just absorb­ing in Kansas/​Midwestern culture.

Artists are peo­ple who do not have real jobs.  They are as likely to spend their time drink­ing absinthe, doing drugs, and sleep­ing around as they are to do any­thing hon­est and deserv­ing of com­pen­sa­tion.  Artists do not con­tribute to the growth and wel­fare of soci­ety in mean­ing­ful ways.  They are prob­a­bly not very smart, because if they were smart, they would have gone into a pro­fes­sion like engi­neer­ing or med­i­cine where they could actu­ally do some good and make real money to sup­port their fam­i­lies.  Artists, above all else, are irre­spon­si­ble, child­ish, and poor.  POOR!

Conversely, artists are tal­ented (even if that tal­ent isn’t val­ued very highly).  They can draw any­thing they can imag­ine effort­lessly.  Their imag­i­na­tions are supe­rior to almost any­one elses’s.  They speak a secret lan­guage of color and form, and really, if you want to rearrange your liv­ing room and get some new cur­tains, an artist would not be a bad per­son to ask.  They’ll prob­a­bly help for beer money.

Why I am not an Artist (the rationalizations)

I’m cre­ative, sure.  I do a bit of writ­ing, but writ­ing isn’t art, because art is visual, and writ­ing is lan­guage.   And yes, I know how to oper­ate a cam­era, but art­work should con­vey emo­tions, tell a story, and my pho­tog­ra­phy doesn’t con­vey any such thing.  Anyone can pick up a cam­era and point it at some­thing.  Anyone can take enough shots, throw­ing out the bad, to make them­selves look like a mod­er­ately decent photographer.

I’m a web designer, but design is not art.  Design is com­mu­ni­ca­tion, and it has strict rules (rules that I strug­gle every day to learn and under­stand bet­ter).   And any­way, I pri­mar­ily excel at writ­ing code and solv­ing tech­ni­cal prob­lems, less so than mak­ing things beau­ti­ful and artistic.

Despite my ingrained beliefs about artists as pro­fes­sion­als, I grew up secretly wish­ing I could be some kind of sci­ence artist, but I  wouldn’t ever really because I wanted to con­tribute and make money. And finally, for some rea­son, I can­not ever be an artist because I can­not draw any­thing that I pic­ture in my head.

Why I am an Artist (the realization)

First of all, most of the bull­shit I grew up believ­ing about artists is just that–bullshit.  Artists are as intel­li­gent as any­one else, if not more so,as respon­si­ble, and they are no more likely to drink heav­ily and do drugs than any­one else.  They con­tribute to soci­ety in less quan­tifi­able ways than say, an engi­neer, but they act in a way as society’s con­science, as it’s out­let.  As a means of self-​​reflection.  Artists play a role, and while I don’t quite under­stand that role, I know they have one and it’s deeply impor­tant.  Being an artist is a real job, and has all the bag­gage that jobs have.  It’s also really, really hard to make a liv­ing at.

Being any good does not deter­mine whether one is an artist or not.  And art encom­passes many more skills than just draw­ing.   My pho­tog­ra­phy may be some­thing any­one can do, but every once and a while I make some­thing nobody else  but me could make.  I’m actively try­ing to sell prints of my work actively, so I guess that right there makes me an artist in the same way that actively pur­su­ing pub­li­ca­tion made me a writer.

Design may or may not be art, but I’m a work­ing cre­ative indi­vid­ual.  Sometimes, what I cre­ate is art.  Sometimes, it’s crap.  Well, more often than not.  But I share more in com­mon with work­ing illus­tra­tors and painters now than I do with my friends who spend their days slic­ing DNA in laboratories.

So, yeah.  I am an artist.  Whatever that means–I’m still learn­ing. It’s not all that I am, but I’m done not call­ing myself that just because I can’t draw and I grew up believ­ing some kind of dumb things about who writ­ers are.  My life is cen­tered around cre­ative acts of one form or another, so.  There it is.

Have any of you ever resisted label­ing your­self like that, for sim­i­lar mix­tures of rea­sons?  I’m curi­ous to know if this is dif­fi­cult just for me, or if it is for others.

PS:  I keep try­ing to fix that draw­ing thing.  I’ve been stuck in the first cou­ple of chap­ters of “Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain” for a cou­ple of years.  Maybe this year will be the one that I finally get past the weird trac­ing stuff and start learn­ing how to stop myself from draw­ing on the left side of the brain.

Envelopes? Stationary?

Posted on:

Lazyweb request:  I am look­ing for some really inter­est­ing peri­odesque envelopes that I can mail my Roundbottom Foundation mem­ber­ship kits in.  I received some­thing once in a weird brown paper enve­lope with a red string tie once, and it was really awe­some.  The enve­lope needs man­u­script size, so that prints can be included, along with a sheet of card­board to keep the prints from being bent.

I think I have the sta­tion­ary, seal­ing wax, and the rest sorted out, but cool sources for that stuff would be great.

Anyone have a great source?  Links much appre­ci­ated.  I’m aim­ing for the mem­ber­ship kits to be beau­ti­fully designed down to the paper and envelopes they come in, to make receiv­ing it part of the whole site expe­ri­ence.  Packaging should not be overlooked!

How to get Images Back out of Microsoft Word

Posted on:

One thing I run into some­what fre­quently is con­tent being pro­vided to me in a Microsoft Word file with embed­ded images.  I used to strug­gle with get­ting the high­est qual­ity ver­sion of those images back out of Word and into Photoshop.  If you cut and paste into Photoshop, you often get it at the res­o­lu­tion it’s been scaled down to, and often, the col­ors are wrong or even the aspect ratio is messed up.  The solu­tion is sim­ple and hav­ing stum­bled upon it,  it is going to save me  plenty of time.  Maybe it can save you some time too.

The Solution

File->Save as->HTML

(I know, *shud­der* at the thought of Word’s HTML.  But we don’t need that!)

Word gen­er­ates an images folder and cre­ates a gif and a jpeg of each image at the max­i­mum res­o­lu­tion. I was able to pull full 300 dpi pho­tos from word files with this tech­nique with none of the image screw-​​ups that you get when you try copy­ing and pasting.

It’s just that easy.  Do you know of a bet­ter way to get those embed­ded images out of Microsoft Word?  Let me know in the comments!

An (Incomplete) Survey of Current Genre Magazine Covers

Posted on:

Paul Raven made a com­ment today on his blog com­par­ing the art­work on a cou­ple of dif­fer­ent mag­a­zine cov­ers. Warren Ellis has recently been on about cover design as well. So I thought today, I’d look at the lat­est batch of cov­ers for every mag­a­zine I could remem­ber, and write some gen­er­al­ized thoughts on the design. I’m a self-​​taught designer, so take my com­ments and crit­i­cisms with a grain of salt.

Continue read­ing ›

On The Popularity of Steampunk

Posted on:
New generation iPodsImage via Wikipedia

Does the New York Times arti­cle on Steampunk mean the genre/​fashion craze has made the high water mark and will begin to recede from here? What is the shelf-​​life of an aes­thetic move­ment, and for that mat­ter, what is the soci­o­log­i­cal force behind this par­tic­u­lar movement?

It’s a Stylistic Rebellion

Particularly as an aes­thetic move­ment, steam­punk is pop­u­lar pri­mar­ily with an under 30 set. This is a gen­er­a­tion that has rarely owned hand-​​crafted objects. Our con­sumer goods have been mass man­u­fac­tured, extruded plas­tic blocks. Aesthetic appeal was rarely a con­sid­er­a­tion, and even if it was, each prod­uct was exactly iden­ti­cal to the other. You could try and stand out through your par­tic­u­lar fash­ion sense and con­sumer good choices, but more often than not, you ended up look­ing like a thou­sand others.

Steampunk is a mid­dle fin­ger to the iPod, but it’s also a blown kiss. This move­ment says, “yes” to tech­nol­ogy and sci­ence, but also “does it have to look so anti­sep­tic?” The design aes­thetic of Apple appeals to many, as evi­denced by their stock prices, but it’s some­what repul­sive to oth­ers. And for a gen­er­a­tion who has rarely owned hand-​​crafted objects, the attrac­tion of tak­ing some­thing and mod­i­fy­ing it, craft­ing it, until it is yours and unique–is very strong. The Victorian period was not the last time things were made by hand, but it’s an aes­thetic dis­tantly enough removed from the mod­ern that it feels dif­fer­ent, more so than the 40s, 50s, 60s, etc. Steampunk is brown and brass, in con­trast to the whites and blacks of mod­ern design. It’s metal and wood, not plas­tic. It’s lace, not lycra.

It is also a call­back to a period when objects looked exactly as if they were capa­ble of what they could do. A square block of plas­tic does not con­vey its abil­ity to com­mu­ni­cate over vast dis­tances. There’s noth­ing inher­ently com­mu­nica­tive about it’s shape. A steam­punk ray gun, on the other hand, can­not be con­fused for much of any­thing else. Technology then was cruder, but you could tell what some­thing did by look­ing at it. You could see the inner work­ings, and those inner work­ings were much eas­ier to under­stand. I think most peo­ple feel they could learn to put watch pieces together. Not very many believe they could learn to man­u­fac­ture cir­cuit boards.

Has it peaked?

Unless you’re invested semi-​​professionally in the pop­u­lar­ity of the genre as I am, then this ques­tion doesn’t prob­a­bly mat­ter to you. Having spent most of my spring prepar­ing a series of images and sto­ry­lines that draw heav­ily from this aes­thetic, I am a lit­tle con­cerned that the pop­u­lar­ity of steam­punk is about to peak, if it hasn’t already. If the activ­ity on the steam­fash­ion group on Livejournal is any indi­ca­tion, pop­u­lar­ity has already begun to wane. I recently rejoined this group, and I have found that posts to it are increas­ingly infre­quent. Now it may just be that every­one is too busy mak­ing things, but I sus­pect some have already moved on to other fix­a­tions. After all, you could make a strong case that the fashion-​​aspect of steam­punk evolved out of Goth cul­ture, and so it’s not unrea­son­able to believe that it will con­tinue to evolve and frac­ture off into other sub-​​cultures. We already have terms like clock­punk and dieselpunk, even if these terms don’t have the same trac­tion in the zeit­geist that steam­punk has right now.

The nice thing about a genre and an aes­thetic that is based heav­ily on a his­tor­i­cal period is, it prob­a­bly never really goes out of fash­ion. There will always be some small sub­set of fans inter­ested in the time period. Let’s face it: steam­punk is freak­ing cool, and it’s going to take some­thing pretty dras­tic to change that. Even if that does change, it’s not like being uncool has ever stopped fans from lik­ing something.