Here’s the intro in question and a good overview about the talk surrounding it.
I was thrilled to watch it when it aired, and I found it very provocative, which I imagine was part of the point. But do you think it did anything to shock the average Simpsons viewer? It’s not a realistic portrayal of the production of the show (at least, I doubt they use sad unicorns to punch holes in their DVDs) and as I understand it, the conditions their Korean animators work under are nothing like that. There are probably animation studios that are run like forced labor camps, I suspect.
Is it subversion for subversion’s sake, or is there a political message the audience was supposed to take away? Was it supposed to make me think or encourage me to act? What do you think?
The book world may have stories divided down lines based on age and level of maturity, but the line between entertainment for adults and entertainment for younger children has never been as blurred as it has been by Pixar’s films. It’s indisputable that their films are popular with children. The sheer volume of Nemo merchandise I see to this day backs up that assertion. At the aquarium, no kid could see the fish from that film without shouting out their names. “Look mommy, Dory!” I listend to variations of this for two hours.
This lesson has never been driven home so well as by Up. The protagonist is a widower, and we spend the first 20 minutes getting to know his free-spirited wife. We see their lives pass before our eyes, and when she passes, we feel it deeply. I had a hard time keeping my eyes dry, I admit it.
In Wall-E, the first interactions with another creature we see are between the robot and a cockroach. Does Wall-E smash the bug, disgusted? Of course not. He befriends it. The essence of his character is revealed in that simple scene, and we fall for him.

![bg15_320a[1]](http://www.jeremiahtolbert.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/bg15_320a1-210x300.jpg)