Posts Tagged ‘animation’

That Banksy-​​designed Simpsons Couch Gag

Posted on:

Here’s who Banksy is.

Here’s the intro in ques­tion and a good overview about the talk sur­round­ing it.

I was thrilled to watch it when it aired, and I found it very provoca­tive, which I imag­ine was part of the point.  But do you think it did any­thing to shock the aver­age Simpsons viewer?  It’s not a real­is­tic por­trayal of the pro­duc­tion of the show (at least, I doubt they use sad uni­corns to punch holes in their DVDs) and as I under­stand it, the con­di­tions their Korean ani­ma­tors work under are noth­ing like that.  There are prob­a­bly ani­ma­tion stu­dios that are run like forced labor camps, I suspect.

Is it sub­ver­sion for subversion’s sake, or is there a polit­i­cal mes­sage the audi­ence was sup­posed to take away?  Was it sup­posed to make me think or encour­age me to act?  What do you think?

5 Writing Lessons I Learned from Pixar

Posted on:

It’s my per­sonal opin­ion that some of the absolute best sto­ry­tellers on the planet today work for Pixar. Brad Bird’s The Iron Giant is eas­ily my favorite tra­di­tion­ally ani­mated film. And now, I think Up, the lat­est Pixar mas­ter­piece, has man­aged to top all the films that came before it.

I’m rarely as touched and thrilled by an expe­ri­ence as I am by watch­ing their movies.

  1. Writing doesn’t have to be YA, or for Adults. It can be both.

    The book world may have sto­ries divided down lines based on age and level of matu­rity, but the line between enter­tain­ment for adults and enter­tain­ment for younger chil­dren has never been as blurred as it has been by Pixar’s films. It’s indis­putable that their films are pop­u­lar with chil­dren. The sheer vol­ume of Nemo mer­chan­dise I see to this day backs up that asser­tion. At the aquar­ium, no kid could see the fish from that film with­out shout­ing out their names. “Look mommy, Dory!” I lis­tend to vari­a­tions of this for two hours.

    I think Pixar is the very model of fam­ily entertainment–films that can be enjoyed by every­one. And the more I think about it, the more I real­ize that much of chil­dren or YA lit­er­a­ture is the same way. There’s a kind of sub­con­cious stigma for adults read­ing YA fic­tion in my expe­ri­ence. I saw this often when Harry Potter was pop­u­lar. Some could not get past the idea that “Harry Potter is for kids.” It’s not. It’s for peo­ple who enjoy sto­ries. Just like Pixar’s films. I have a lot of respect for some­one who can tell a story so broadly appeal­ing, and per­son­ally, I want to learn how to do it too.

  2. Don’t Be Afraid to Put Heavy Stuff in a Light-​​Hearted Story

    This les­son has never been dri­ven home so well as by Up. The pro­tag­o­nist is a wid­ower, and we spend the first 20 min­utes get­ting to know his free-​​spirited wife. We see their lives pass before our eyes, and when she passes, we feel it deeply. I had a hard time keep­ing my eyes dry, I admit it.

    Funny with­out bite is like a fluffy cake. It lacks sub­stance and grav­ity. The under­tones cre­ated by the loss of a loved one, absen­tee fathers, and lifes not lived, those are the things that take an enjoy­able story from being fun but for­get­table to being great and unfor­get­table. Make us laugh. Make us cry. Make us laugh and cry in the same breath. If Pixar can do it, we can do it in our sto­ries and nov­els too.

  3. A character’s first inter­ac­tions can often tell you every­thing you need to know about them.

    In Wall-​​E, the first inter­ac­tions with another crea­ture we see are between the robot and a cock­roach. Does Wall-​​E smash the bug, dis­gusted? Of course not. He befriends it. The essence of his char­ac­ter is revealed in that sim­ple scene, and we fall for him.

    Pixar’s char­ac­ters appear­ances often reflect their per­son­al­ity, some­thing that can­not so eas­ily be done in fic­tion itself. But it’s not just their appear­ance. Watch each one of the films. In a few brief moments, we learn that Marlin will do any­thing for Nemo, that Woody is a leader and likes help­ing other toys, that Mr. Incredible is a bit full of him­self and dis­mis­sive of oth­ers, but loves his wife, and then, his fam­ily, very much, and that Remy loves food. Often, the cen­tral con­flict of the story arises from this char­ac­ter­i­za­tion as well. Wall-​​E needs to love some­one, and fol­lows EVE into space itself. Woody butts heads with Buzz. Mr. Incredible makes his own arch-​​nemesis because of his rude­ness. And so on.

  4. The work is found in the process of rewrit­ing. Also, write for yourself.

    In this inter­view with some of Pixar’s writ­ers, a cou­ple of com­ments really struck home with me, align­ing with things I had noticed from watch­ing the Behind-​​the-​​Scenes extras on their DVDs. Pixar doesn’t do focus groups. They write what they love. And they rewrite and rewrite until they get it the way they want. The story often changes dra­mat­i­cally in the course of revi­sions. Sometimes, we get obsessed with our first drafts, and our hopes rise or sink with the rel­a­tive suc­cess of it. I am par­tic­u­larly guilty of giv­ing up on sto­ries when the first draft doesn’t turn out as well as I imag­ined it.

  5. Amazing char­ac­ters can be born from the sim­plest of ideas.

    The gen­e­sis of the pro­tag­o­nist Walter in Up was a sim­ple sketch of a grumpy old man hold­ing a bal­loon. “Grumpy old man” is a hoary stereo­type, but stereo­types in and of them­selves aren’t wrong. It’s stop­ping with a stereo­type is a mis­take. From that sim­ple sketch, Pixar build a fully real­ized and appeal­ing char­ac­ter. They took some­one and made him both unpleas­ant and lov­able at the same time.

    Russell, seen right, is designed as a char­ac­ter to coun­ter­point every­thing about Walter. He’s round where Walter is angles. He’s kind and inno­cent and youth­ful. The con­tra­dic­tion of the essence of these two char­ac­ters gen­er­ates much of the humor and the con­flict to drive the story.

jQuery Experiment: Looping Clouds Header

Posted on:

I’m work­ing on a new design for this website–one that shows off my skills as a designer a bit bet­ter, and so on, to help secure the job.  In doing so, I’ve been build­ing lit­tle exper­i­ments to teach myself new tricks.  I thought I’d share this lit­tle trick with you today.

Experiment: Clouds

The idea started out pretty sim­ple– I just wanted to loop some mov­ing clouds.  But as I thought about it more, I wanted it to be more and more arti­fi­cial look­ing, like an old stage set.   I’ve got a lot of fea­tures I need to add, but the basic the­ory is there.  You can view source and see exactly what javascript I’m using to move things around.

Don’t bother look­ing at this with IE6.  The trans­paren­cies won’t work.  And yes, the pngs make file sizes kinda big, but I real­lly wanted the trans­parency effects. It’s an exper­i­ment, like  I said.

More later!

Recommended: WALL-​​E

Posted on:

Do you remem­ber that Disney CG film Dinosaurs? It’s orig­i­nal con­cept involved a fea­ture length movie with ani­mals that only emoted, and never spoke.  Having always been a big fan of com­puter ani­ma­tion, I was excited at the early rumors of the film.  Unfortunately, Disney execs got involved and the result was the talky-​​travesty that we even­tu­ally saw.  Okay, so maybe “trav­esty” is a strong word.  It wasn’t a bad film– It just failed to live up to it’s poten­tial as a work that stretched the bound­aries of its format.

WALL-​​E suc­ceeds in many, many ways, but the most fas­ci­nat­ing aspect for me was the extent to which Pixar relied on non­ver­bal com­mu­ni­ca­tion to con­vey the story.  I have a strong feel­ing that in prepa­ra­tion for this film, the ani­ma­tors watched reels and reels of silent com­edy films; Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplin espe­cially.  Watch the move­ments of WALL-​​E, and I think you will see some of the exag­ger­ated man­ner­isms of those silent film stars.  Wall-​​E is all angles, but angles that can change their com­po­si­tion to one another, so he meets the basic prin­ci­ples of com­puter char­ac­ter ani­ma­ton estab­lished by John Lasseter so many years ago with Luxo.  He can squash and stretch.

(This review con­tains spoilers.)

Continue read­ing ›