Archive for the ‘My Writing’ Category

5 Ways Photography Has Improved My Writing

Posted on:

That seems like an unusual idea, doesn’t it?  That wield­ing a cam­era to cap­ture sin­gle moments in time really has any­thing valu­able to add to the process of writ­ing sto­ries?   But it has, I think.  Each time I pick up the cam­era, I think about writ­ing, and each time I write, I think about the cam­era.  The two pas­sions have odd syn­er­gies between them.  There are com­mon­al­i­ties among all cre­ative endeav­ors, per­haps.  Here are a few prin­ci­ples that I feel have worked their way into my work , or become stronger, because of my pur­suit of photography.

  • Economy
    Powerful pho­tographs can be cre­ated with very sim­ple ele­ments.  Isolating your sub­ject, focus­ing on it, and elim­i­nat­ing areas of dis­trac­tion.  The prin­ci­ple comes eas­ily in pho­tog­ra­phy after prac­tic­ing for a while.  Then, when I return to the page, I start see­ing things with the same eye for econ­omy.  This sen­tence isn’t really nec­es­sary.  What’s really impor­tant in this scene?  What can I sim­ply hint at to pro­vide depth, with­out dis­tract­ing from my pri­mary purpose?
  • Balance
    Visual images carry weight, and a well-​​composed image bal­ances this weight to be pleas­ing to the eye.  Plots require care­ful bal­ance too, between the pre­lude, ris­ing action, and denoue­ment.  Too much of one and the bal­ance of the story can be thrown off entirely.
  • Focusing
    You would think that focus­ing these days is a mat­ter of half-​​pressing the focus but­ton and let­ting the cam­era auto­mat­i­cally cap­ture the sub­ject.  For a lot of pho­tos, this is all you have to do.  But some­times, you need to change your focal points.  Sometimes, you delib­er­ately want things out of focus for effect, to con­vey a mood.    It’s easy to rely on the cam­era, but mas­tery comes when you push past the auto­matic set­tings and into the deeper fea­tures of the camera.

    Pushing past the auto­matic set­tings in writ­ing means dis­card­ing early ideas, and dig­ging deeper for more essen­tial truths.  Writing not on autopi­lot, but with care­ful con­sid­er­a­tion, tweak­ing until the men­tal image is just right, with the sub­ject in focus, and dis­tract­ing ele­ments not.

  • Capturing Action
    Capturing action in pho­tog­ra­phy requires a quick trig­ger fin­ger and being in the right place at just the right moment.   You have to plan ahead, choos­ing your angle and hope for the best.   I find that I plan my scenes now like I plan my shots, ahead of time, think­ing about the best angle to approach from, and how I can get that impor­tant moment down on the page
  • Hinting at a Story
    In some of my pho­tog­ra­phy, I actu­ally want the image itself to con­vey a story.  The lit­tle details of an image, back­ground ele­ments, tiny details, the way light hits just right to lighten or darken a mood–everything in your image can add up to tell a story, to hint at events that hap­pen before and after the frame has snapped.  In writ­ing, I think it’s impor­tant to know what came before a story, and to be able to work in those details that cre­ate a piece that feels like a small glimpse of some­thing larger, some­thing con­nected to a greater con­ti­nu­ity.  I often say that your story should be about the sec­ond most impor­tant thing to hap­pen to your char­ac­ter.   If their life starts when you start writ­ing, then they aren’t as inter­est­ing and rounded as they per­haps could be with back story.  Too much back story, how­ever, and your story can become bogged down in what was and not what will be.  Just like how pho­tographs can hint at a story, you take a light touch with this aspect, devel­op­ing your back story and world build­ing just enough to give the impres­sion of some­thing larger, with­out try­ing to force the whole thing onto the reader

Do you find that your inter­ests teaches you unex­pected things about one another?  What inter­sec­tions between dif­fer­ent arts and activ­i­ties have you dis­cov­ered, and what have these dis­cov­er­ies illu­mi­nated for you?

Some day, I’ll write about how writ­ing and fish­ing have many things in com­mon.   For one, both require tremen­dous amounts of patience to get what you what.

Forcing Creativity

Posted on:

Some will tell you that it’s not pos­si­ble to force cre­ativ­ity, or that the results from “forc­ing” cre­ativ­ity are sub-​​par to the work that “just hap­pens.”  I’m here to argue the opposite.

For some cre­ative folks, such as myself, sit­ting around wait­ing for inspi­ra­tion to strike, for the mood to be right, and for the stars to align is a recipe for get­ting jack shit done.  We will write off our lack of pro­duc­tiv­ity by say­ing some­thing like “I just don’t have any­thing to say” or “the muse isn’t with me today.”  I’ve used both of these excuses even recently to myself.

Hogwash.  The truth is, noth­ing moti­vates me more than a dead­line that has some teeth to it.  A good exam­ple was the Federations anthol­ogy.  I knew about it for months, and I had pid­dled around with a cou­ple of ideas.  Nothing really set­tled out, though.  The dead­line was lit­er­ally 48 hours away when, the idea of los­ing a good oppor­tu­nity to sell work to a favorite edi­tor hit me.  I didn’t want to miss out on an oppor­tu­nity like this, and that was before I knew which lumi­nar­ies of the field are in the book.   With that dri­ving me, I wrote “The Culture Archivist” and sent it to first read­ers.  Got it back, revised it again, and sent it to JJA.  It went through some edi­to­r­ial revi­sions, and then it was in the book.

The truth I must admit to myself is that I am a cre­atively lazy per­son at times.  I want it to be easy.  And it’s not.  It never gets any eas­ier.  You just get bet­ter at it.  But you still have to over­come the same iner­tia that was there when you first started out.  That takes a com­bi­na­tion of willpower, and if you can man­age it, discipline.

This holds true for every cre­ative endeavor  of mine, whether it be pho­tog­ra­phy, writ­ing, or design.  The hard­est part is just get­ting started.  And you have to force your­self to start.  Because if you don’t even get started, you’re not bloody well likely to fin­ish it, are you?

Force your­self to cre­ate using any means nec­es­sary. Some of these might work:

  • Ask your spouse or sig­nif­i­cant other to with­hold sex until you fin­ish.  Double motivator–you’ll want it done and your spouse will be really encouraging!
  • Go on a bread and water diet until you reach your ini­tial goal. (Do not do really do this, seri­ously.  Eat healthy.)
  • Use an inter­net block­ing pro­gram when you work on the com­puter.  These are usu­ally time based, but I sus­pect that 4 hours or so with­out the inter­net will get some­thing writ­ten and/​or made.
  • Instead of the stick, try the car­rot.  Promise your­self a $50 shop­ping spree if you fin­ish the work, or a night out for dinner.

External forces have always been the best moti­va­tor for me, but with many projects, there’s no exter­nal force.  As a free­lancer, I don’t have a boss beyond the client, and the client isn’t always moti­vated them­selves to fin­ish the project.  So it’s impor­tant for free­lancers to learn to self-​​motivate.

A desire to cre­ate some­thing great is often not enough moti­va­tion.  Sometimes, you have to prod your­self into get­ting started.  But once the ball is rolling, it tends to stay in motion for as long as you can afford the time.  For me, the sin­gle best thing about cre­at­ing things is los­ing myself in the process.  Time becomes mean­ing­less and my left-​​brain takes a nice long nap.  Call it what you will–the zone, in the moment, or some­thing else– it’s one of the great­est rewards of being a cre­ative per­son.  That plea­sur­able expe­ri­ence is almost rea­son enough to make things.  The fin­ished prod­uct is just a bonus sometimes.

What are some meth­ods you use to moti­vate your­self when you have the desire, but not the will?  How do you keep your­self on task?  Share your meth­ods with us.

Tomorrow, I will talk about strate­gies for mak­ing time to make things around a busy life.

Questions about Podcasts, Some Escape Pod News

Posted on:

I need to under­stand more about how peo­ple inter­act with pod­casts, now that I’m edit­ing for one.  I have some ques­tions that I’d like to ask you all.

  • Do you lis­ten to pod­casts? If so, which ones?  (If no, please do say so, and you can ignore the rest of the questions.)
  • How do you lis­ten to them?  At your com­puter, in the car, while jog­ging, etc?
  • Do you just sub­scribe in iTunes or another pod­catcher and for­get, or do you read the web­sites asso­ci­ated with them too?
  • What kinds of prod­ucts adver­tised in a pod­cast via spon­sor­ships would you actu­ally find interesting?
  • What are the traits of a good pod­cast episode in your opinion?

I’m just try­ing to under­stand how peo­ple inte­act with pod­casts a lit­tle more.  I have my own pre-​​formed the­o­ries, but they’re not based on anyone’s real­ity except my own.  Ostensibly, answers to these ques­tions will help me make Escape Pod an even bet­ter pod­cast than it already is.

By they way, let me just say, we’re a pay­ing mar­ket, but we can’t pay with­out the sup­port of our lis­ten­ers.  If you reg­u­larly lis­ten to Escape Pod and enjoy its con­tent, please con­sider mak­ing a dona­tion via PayPal.  Much like NPR, we’re funded by the listeners.

And of course, if you’re a writer, I want to see your sto­ries.  Read our sub­mis­sion guide­lines and send your work along!

This week, I pur­chased sto­ries by:  Kameron Hurley, Merrie Fuller, Ian Creasey, David Rivera, Ian McHugh, Tina Connolly, and more.  As an edi­tor, I don’t have any agenda other than to find sto­ries that I think are good that will also make good audio pro­duc­tions.   I think we have some great sto­ries com­ing up for the lis­ten­ers.  I hope they and you will agree.

The Sofanauts » The Sofanauts No 3 (Listen to me be a fool)

Posted on:

Once again this week, I appear on Sofanauts, Tony Smith’s SF dis­cus­sion pod­cast.  This week, the guests were Gord Sellar, awe­some writer and future John W. Campbell Award win­ner, and Ray Sizemore, a fan­tas­tic nar­ra­tor of podcasts.

I don’t know what it is about being on pod­casts that turns me into a rav­ing lunatic, but this week, I spend time explain­ing why WALL-​​E is darker than the Dark Knight, why I think the Singularity as a futur­is­tic con­cept is laugh­able, and to stick a fork in my career once and for all, I dis­re­spect the sci­ence fic­tion saint Robert Heinlein.

So, if you enjoy lis­ten­ing to me make an utter fool of myself in a rel­a­tively enter­tain­ing fash­ion, go take a listen.

The Sofanauts » The Sofanauts No 3.

5 Books on Writing and Science Fiction That Made Me a Better Writer

Posted on:

In the spirit of other posts this week, I thought I would share with you five books that I keep handy still when I’m try­ing to write fic­tion. Some of these books have imparted their lessons already, and some still have a lot to teach me. Each one of them has been use­ful for dif­fer­ent rea­sons, but I rec­om­mend all of them if you’re seri­ous about fic­tion. Some of them I rec­om­mend even to estab­lished writ­ers. Read on for the details.

Creating Short Fiction by Damon Knight

Strong sto­ries are made from things inside you want­ing to get out.

This was one of the very first books on writ­ing sci­ence fic­tion that was rec­om­mended to me. Damon Knight and his wife founded the Clarion Workshop. If any­one knows about cri­tiquing writ­ers sto­ries and teach­ing peo­ple to write, it’s this man.

I love the tone of this book. It’s encour­ag­ing while being real­is­tic. It’s writ­ten in a very relaxed style. One notion from this book that I found par­tic­u­larly valu­able was the con­cept of “Fred.” Fred is where Damon Knight’s ideas come from. What he means is the sub­con­cious. I’ve found that writ­ing for me is very much about the strug­gle and coop­er­a­tion between my con­cious and sub­con­cious minds. Damon puts it in sim­ple terms that made it clear to me that the lit­tle back-​​of-​​the-​​mind feel­ings were impor­tant to the process, and how impor­tant it is to lis­ten to Fred, to feed Fred, and gen­er­ally keep him entertained.

I’ve had prob­lems with my Fred lately, and I think that’s because I let my Fred become pre­oc­cu­pied with other mat­ters. But I’m work­ing on get­ting him fed up again, and lis­ten­ing to his whispers.

Another area that really helped me was the sec­tion on struc­ture. Damon explains some dia­gram­ming tech­niques that can be very help­ful. But there’s some­thing great on nearly every page, and I found it incred­i­bly help­ful early on.

Science Fiction: 101 edited by Robert Silverberg

Mastery of craft is a mat­ter of process, not of a sin­gle blind­ing moment of attain­ment: you go on work­ing toward it all your life.

I am not one to advo­cate that new writ­ers have to read the clas­sics of the genre before they get started. Frankly, I find a lot of the so called “Golden Age” to be bor­ing and very out­dated. However, There is some­thing to be said for read­ing the great sto­ries of the past, and this book does a pretty good job of find­ing gen­er­ally good sto­ries, but also sto­ries that teach a par­tic­u­lar les­son. Through it all you also get to learn about Robert Silverberg’s early career. It doesn’t work like that any­more, but it’s still inter­est­ing if you like sci­ence fiction.

The book’s an anthol­ogy, a how-​​to, and a mem­oir rolled into one tome. And if you think the rejec­tion let­ters you get today are bad, wait until you read the notes that Horace Gold sent Silverberg. Silverberg’s dis­sec­tion of the sto­ries con­tained within are quite fan­tas­tic to me, and that he was able to find a tech­ni­cal flaw in Bester’s “Fondly Fahrenheit” is damned impres­sive. It’s a minor one, but he uses it to illus­trate an impor­tant notion about para­graphs being con­nected to one another.

The Science of Science-​​Fiction Writing by James Gunn

Honore de Balzac dis­cov­ered that a char­ac­ter did not exist in fic­tion until that char­ac­ter had inter­acted with another char­ac­ter, and Gustave Flaubert dis­cov­ered that noth­ing exists in fic­tion until it has been located in time and place with an appeal to at least three senses.

I spoke about James Gunn as a teacher ear­lier this week. He’s not nearly as faux-​​discouraging in this text, and it’s quite nice. There’s a bit of an old-​​fashioned feel to this book, and I even dis­agree with some of the things that Gunn says, such as the notion that main­stream fic­tion dis­counts Darwin entirely. I think this may have been true in the past, but maybe not so much these days. A lot of the notions of SF have been coopted by the main­stream since he wrote the book, I think.

This is a good middle-​​level text, I think. He approaches con­cepts like char­ac­ter and plot in a very sen­si­cal way, and some of the his­tory of sci­ence fic­tion is very inter­est­ing from an enthusiast’s stand­point, even if it won’t tell you how to write a bet­ter story.


Writing the Breakout Novel
by Donald Maas

A great fic­tional world is a sum of details that to most read­ers are unknown.

This is an odd one for me to include because I haven’t fin­ished the book yet, but Even half-​​way through, and it’s already had an impact on the way I am think­ing about my novel projects. I don’t feel that this book will help that much if you’re just start­ing out, because it paints a fairly broad brush. I think Maas assumes a cer­tain level of expe­ri­ence here, even talk­ing about his book in terms of estab­lished nov­el­ists look­ing to take their work up to the next level.

It’s really his dis­cus­sion of rais­ing the stakes that has sunk its teeth into me. He even says that if there’s one thing that will make a story more pow­er­ful, it’s to raise the stakes. Now in sci­ence fic­tion, I think it’s eas­ier to take this too far. You can put the entire planet or uni­verse at stake in the right sit­u­a­tions, and it’s hard t dra­ma­tize those very well in my expe­ri­ence. But through the sim­ple act of con­tem­plat­ing the stakes, I’ve pushed sev­eral recent bits of writ­ing into a much more inter­est­ing place. I’ll report back on more of this one when I’ve man­aged to fin­ish it.

Story by Robert McKee

In life, expe­ri­ences become mean­ing­ful with reflec­tion in time. In art, they are mean­ing­ful now, at the instant they hap­pen.

For under­stand­ing sto­rycraft, and the struc­ture of sto­ries and plot, there’s no bet­ter book than this. I return to this book time and tmie again. It is so rich with under­stand­ing of the nature of story that my mind can­not con­tain its full impli­ca­tions in a sin­gle read. I pick this up from time to time and flip to ran­dom pages, always learn­ing some new les­son. Robert McKee uses a lot of screen­writ­ing exam­ples here, and osten­si­bly it’s ori­ented towards that, but don’t let that dis­uade you from pur­chas­ing this one. It’s beyond fan­tas­tic. I don’t use this term often, but if you are just start­ing out with writ­ing, this is a must-​​read.

Buy The Books

So those are the books that I have sit­ting next to me as we speak. I have to buy a copy of the If any of these sound inter­est­ing to you, and you’re not boy­cotting Amazon, please con­sider buy­ing the books through the links I’ve pro­vided here. It will help sup­port me writ­ing more posts like this one (although less obvi­ously com­mer­cially crass). I’ve applied for an Indie Books affil­i­ate but haven’t been approved yet, and will use that affil­i­ate in the future for this kind of thing in addi­tion to Amazon.

How to Build a Good Critique Group

Posted on:

So, to con­tinue the theme of writ­ing advice, we move on to another ques­tion from Monday’s thread, this time from the LJ mir­ror by alaneer:

Here’s a prob­lem: how does one go about find­ing a small crit group whose mem­ber have to give crits in less than 2–3 weeks? Or form­ing a crit group like that.

This is a good ques­tion.  I  have no idea how any­one man­aged to learn sto­rycraft  in the age before the inter­net.  SF writ­ers were prob­a­bly spread over as much geog­ra­phy as they are today, so how did they cri­tique each other?  Postal mail?  In-​​person work­shops?    They’d have to meet some­how in the first place.  Ah, so they went to cons?  Those cost time and money.  Luckily,  we were born at a time where we could take advan­tage of nearly free, instan­ta­neous global com­mu­ni­ca­tions, and that means find­ing peo­ple will­ing to be in a cri­tique group is the least of your prob­lems.  Finding the right peo­ple is much more dif­fi­cult.    Here are some tech­niques that have helped me.

Join one of the larger estab­lished work­shop groups such as the Online Writer’s Workshop or Critters.    Personally, I’m an alum­nus of the OWW.  So is Sarah Prineas, Elizabeth Bear, Charles Coleman Finlay, and many oth­ers.  There’s lit­tle doubt in my mind that the expe­ri­ence of putting your work tho­rugh the OWW will improve it.    Will it get you a book deal or a pro sale?  Maybe.  You’re doing most of the work, but if you lis­ten to what peo­ple have to say, I think you will come closer sooner than you would have on your own.

When you first join these work­shops, you’re just throw­ing stuff at the wall and see­ing what sticks.  You have no idea who is going to read your story and pro­vide a cri­tique, at least in the case of the OWW.  While you’re wait­ing, you should go find work that you think is at least at your level of skill, if not sev­eral lev­els higher.  Provide a thought­ful cri­tique.  They won’t always return it, but some­times they will see some­thing they like in your work as well, and this is how you start build­ing ind­vid­i­ual relationships.

I no longer use the OWW, but I have kept in touch with many of the writ­ers from that work­shop for the pur­poses of cri­tiquing and of course due to the fact that they’re my friends.   In any large group work­shop, I think tal­ent has a way of find­ing like tal­ent.  Groups are formed within, and they can be exported eas­ily from the larger work­shop.  You will out­grow together the lower-​​level issues that work­shops address par­tic­u­larly well.

Another option is to just ask authors who you admire if you could trade cri­tiques with them.    This is how Jay Lake and I ended up trad­ing com­ments on each other’s stories.

Jay taught me a very valu­able notion, which was par­tic­u­larly help­ful when I was writ­ing a story a week or more and still look­ing for feed­back.  That was to build a list of first readers/​critiquers, but make sure they know you don’t expect them to read every­thing you send out.  And vice versa.  Sometimes peo­ple have time, some­times they don’t.  In an ideal sit­u­a­tion, you’ll have enough peo­ple on your list that each piece of writ­ing you send out will get you sev­eral solid cri­tiques that will help you revise or deter­mine whether to send the story out at all.

I don’t really believe in form­ing groups per­say anymore–although I have been part of them from time to time, and I sus­pect groups like Blue Heaven are really great for what they do.  For the way I write, I just pre­fer to build indi­vid­ual, one-​​on-​​one rela­tion­ships.  Any time you get more than four writ­ers in a group, you will have pol­i­tics, and I have lit­tle tol­er­ance for that myself.  Maybe you like it? If so, form a group, set up a list-​​serve for email and go to town.

Any of the meth­ods above will help you with your ulti­mate goal, which is find­ing peo­ple with which to col­lab­o­ra­tively improve your work.   Also, you’ll prob­a­bly make good friends.  But I should point out, a good cri­ti­quer is not nec­es­sar­ily a good friend, and the oppo­site is often even less pos­si­ble.  Depending on how you react to the crit­i­cism, you end up hat­ing your best cri­ti­quers, but in a broc­coli kind of way.

Good luck.  Anyone who is inter­ested in trad­ing cri­tiques with me need only drop me a line.  I can’t agree to do so with every­one who asks, but I try to do so. I have a lot less time to cri­tique now that I am edit­ing Escape Pod.

A Serious Question for My Blog Readers

Posted on:

It’s a sim­ple ques­tion.  I’m look­ing for an angle on my blog­ging, and it’s often been sug­gested that I find prob­lems and solve them. So I ask those of you who already read me:

What are the prob­lems you’re strug­gling with, whether it be with writ­ing, or web design, or pho­tog­ra­phy, or any other subject?

I want my blog­ging work to be worth­while, and I want it to help peo­ple.  I really do like shar­ing what I know, what I’ve learned.   I may not have answers to your prob­lems, but I’ll try to find them, or point you to peo­ple who do.

I’ll pick one of the most insight­ful com­menters on this post between here and LiveJournal and send them a copy of the new anthol­ogy, Federations, edited by John Joseph Adams, and con­tain­ing sto­ries by Lois McMaster Bujold, George R.R. Martin, Anee McCaffrey, Alastair Reynolds, Robert Silverberg, and uh, me.

So, spill?

New Story Online: The Kansas Jayhawk vs. The Midwest Monster Squad (With Exciting Poster Illustration Action)

Posted on:

Who doesn’t love giant mon­sters ter­ror­iz­ing the land?  Who doesn’t love geeks who love giant mon­sters and crack­ing wise?  If you don’t, then you can skip this story.  If you do… read on.

This is prob­a­bly one of my most pop­u­lar sci­ence fic­tion sto­ries, and for what­ever rea­son, I’ve never got around to get­ting it put online.  With the spare time I have lately to work on my skillset, I decided to do a fun poster illus­tra­tion for the story and a hope­fully easy-​​to-​​read layout.

The story orig­i­nally appeared in the May 2005 issue of Interzone, edited by Andy Cox.   It’s my first print mag­a­zine sale.

So with­out fur­ther blath­er­ing, here’s the story and the illustration:

The Kansas Jayhawk vs. The Midwest Monster Squad by Jeremiah Tolbert.

The Hidden Spring and the Abandoned Hog Farm

Posted on:

My step­fa­ther Mike dri­ves me out into the coun­try  to show off some dis­cov­er­ies he made while walk­ing through the woods look­ing for cast-​​off deer antlers.    He and an older man by the name of Chester often go look­ing for such things.

We drive nearly up to the Missouri bor­der and park in an area under con­trol for the Corps of Engineers.   Hills sur­round  a low field that has yet to be plowed under.  Corn stalks still stand here and there like sol­diers on the bat­tle­field at the end of the war, while oth­ers blow across the ground in the breeze.  Purple clover car­pets the soil beneath the stalks, good nitro­gen for when the farmer even­tu­ally does plow and plant for another season.

The sky is strung with low-​​hanging gray cot­ton clouds, thor­oughly obscur­ing the sun. It’s a wel­come change from the sunny bright weather of Colorado, actu­ally.  Overcast days are rare where I live now.  A sharp, cold wind blows, mak­ing me pull my coat around me tighter.  We walk down a muddy road.  Water is every­where, but it hasn’t been rain­ing much, so it seems to come out of nowhere, and I won­der aloud about it. Mike nods and leads me up the side of a hill.  Water trick­les slowly down the slope  through the grass which has become mat­ted down in places with the wet.  We fol­low the water up into a tree­line, step­ping among fallen logs until we come to a stone ridge at the top of the hill.  We move around along the ridge until we spot the source;  an old spring.

A half-​​circle of lime­stone pieces, fit together with no mor­tar, pre­ci­sion work that I become very famil­iar with through the rest of our explo­ration, has been set into the hill­side three feet deep.  the water half-​​fills the hole.  Someone, per­haps as much as a hun­dred years ago, found this tiny upwelling of fresh water, dug it out and rein­forced the walls with stone from the hill­side.  No one lives around here for miles, but that wasn’t always the case.  (More below the photo)

I take pho­tos, trim­ming away brush and debris, clean­ing up the scene as best I can.  The water is green with thick algae, and lichens and moss coat every­thing.  The grass and weeds have yet to grow back, although sky-​​blue wild­flow­ers have sprung up here and there beneath the trees.

Mike gives me a grin as if to say “you haven’t seen any­thing yet” and we set off back down the hill and along the muddy road, around a pond fed by yet another spring.  We walk below the earthen dam that holds back the water, and along­side a  field, fol­low­ing muddy tracks of a doe white-​​tailed deer that passed not more than a cou­ple of hours before us.  We find an old horse-​​drawn plow, rust-​​red in tall grass, the plow­share still bit­ing into the soil. The gears and levers still func­tion.  I pull them and mar­vel at how a 50+ year old plow can be still rel­a­tively intact.  All that it misses is the seat and chains to har­ness to the work horse.

From the plow, we fol­low the base of the large hill until Mike points out a dis­used wagon trail whichs cuts back and angles against the slope, climb­ing to the sum­mit a hun­dred feet or so above the pond and field.  The trail is steep on either side as if heavy wagon loads were carted up and down here until .  When we reach the top, it’s not hard to imag­ine what loads were brought up.

Among the thicket of young trees, maybe 30, 40 years old in places, some older, Mike has found a com­plex of 3 foot high lime­stone walls that fences in more than a football-field’s worth of space.  The walls show the same details and crafts­man­ship of the walls of the hid­den spring.  The stones are not cut of quar­ried.  They are field stones that have been gath­ered and care­fully fit together, tens of thou­sands of them.

First we exam­ine  a cut into the hill­side, a cel­lar almost, walled off with lime­stone as well, with some pale stones show­ing signs of hav­ing been exposed to intense heat.  Here, Mike thinks, was the smoke­house where the pork was hung and cured.   This was a hog farm once.  The walls seem­ingly hap­haz­ard were added to over time as the steadily wealth­ier owner added pens.  I dig around in the rub­ble around the smoke­house and find bits and pieces of old bot­tles and some porcelin.  Mike leans down to me and exclaims “Will you look at that!”  I look up and he’s found an old horse­hoe, rusted bent nails and all.

It’s a lucky horse­shoe,” I say.

Well, it is now,” Mike says.

Mike points out a small alcove of walls with a nar­row entry­way, not more than four feet by six feet, and explains that this is where they would have kept the boar away from the sows, let­ting him out only a few times a year to sire young.  It seems like a frus­trat­ing life for an ani­mal, to hear and smell beau­ti­ful women just on the other side of a wall, but only able to get to them so very rarely. We move on.

Peeking out from just behind the bare trees, I can see a soli­tary brick chim­ney stand­ing twenty feet into the air.  We explore the con­crete foun­da­tion which has heavy iron bolts set in to fas­ten the walls joists which have long since rot­ted away.  I kick away at the fallen leaves and find old roof shin­gles, cor­ru­gated alu­minum sid­ing, and rot­ting wooden floor­boards.    It’s impos­si­ble to look at all of this and not start ot pic­ture the peo­ple who lived here, to imag­ine their ani­mals.  I begin to won­der if they had a barn.  They clearly had a wagon drawn by horses.  I wan­der the grounds and sure enough, I find the buried foun­da­tions of another build­ing, small, but not far from the open­ing in the walls where the wagon trail led into the ruins.  This, I believe was the barn, where the horses were kept, and the walled area around it their yard.

How old is this place?  When did they leave?  How much money must they have had to have raised hun­dreds of hogs here?  The ques­tions the stones illicit are end­less.  We wan­der, trac­ing the out­lines of the farm, and I try to pic­ture it, try to travel back in time with my mind’s eye.  I imag­ine that the farm was first built in the late 1800s, per­haps by a civil war sol­dier home from the war, weary from the killing.   Weary of peo­ple, he buys a par­cel of land far away from the embry­onic towns of Northeast kansas.  It’s not ideal, but some instinct left over from the war instructs him to build his home and farm atop a large rise where he can see for miles around, see the river cut­ting through the hills and carv­ing steep banks below.  there’s not much hard­wood for build­ing, so he begins to fence in his prop­erty with piece of yel­low­stone that lit­ter the ground.  Perhaps he hires a cou­ple of hands to help errect his home, and he takes a young wife from one of the nearby rail­road towns, maybe even Osawatomie.   He pur­chases his first hogs and begins to raise ani­mals.  He plows a field below the hill and plants corn and wheat.  It’s hard work, but not as hard as killing men, there’s that much.

His wife gives birth to three sons and a daugh­ter, and it’s not long before they are put to work expand­ing the fences, build­ing more pens for the hogs.   They strip the hill bare of stones to make their fences, but they don’t sim­ply pile the rocks together loosely.  The hogs could push over poorly built walls–no, they fit the pieces together care­fully.  Sometimes they take a sledge to a piece to break it into smaller pieces, but mostly they use the pieces exactly as they are when they find them, sim­ply fit­ting them together with thought and patience.

The years go by in hard, ful­fill­ing work.  The farm pros­pers.  His daugh­ter and two sons move away to the nearby towns, marry, and raise fam­i­lies.  He is made a wid­ower when his wife suc­cumbs to a fever in the sum­mer, some tick­borne dis­ease.  The sec­ond son, the one for whom farm­ing had always seemed to be his fate, takes over on the farm after his father dies from pneu­mo­nia after a hard win­ter.  The son buries his father in a grave on the hill­side and sets a lime­stone into the ground to mark the spot. He is illiterate–his old man had never placed much stock in edu­ca­tion and did just fine with­out it–and so no words are etched into the marker.  The grave over­looks the acres that the old man has bought up with the growth of his farm and the lucra­tive sale of hogs and pork.

The son spends some of his inher­i­tance and builds a new house, this time with a con­crete foun­da­tion.   It’s small, enough room for a cou­ple of peo­ple to live com­fort­ably.  He mar­ries a woman, but they never have chil­dren.  The depres­sion comes, and things get harder.  Few can afford to buy his pork and hogs.  Eventually, they sell the land to a nearby rancher and move to the city to try their for­tunes there.

And my crys­tal ball goes hazy.  I won­der if there are descen­dants some­where who were raised on sto­ries of life on the old hog farm, but who have never seen what I have seen, never vis­ited their ancestor’s lands.    My fam­ily were farm­ers, not so many gen­er­a­tions ago, but I don’t know the lands they worked.  Arkansas some­where, I am told.

With the ruins explored, Mike and I walk back to the truck in the driz­zling rain.   I feel today as if I have some­how reached back into time and touched the life of some face­less stranger.  History is a funny thing, and I feel closer to it here than I do any­where else.  I don’t know why.

Driving Kansas

Posted on:

Prepare your­self.  I am about to make a bold state­ment that will most likely cause many of you to ques­tion my sanity.

I like–no, even love– dri­ving across Kansas.

It’s a hard drive, eleven or so hours in length, depend­ing on traf­fic in places and how much I stop along the way for gas and food.   Weather at this time of the year can be a seri­ous haz­ard.  It began to snow in Fort Collins not long after I left yes­ter­day, and by this morn­ing, 8 inches had accu­mu­lated. The storms con­tin­ued march­ing from the west to the east and arrived here tonight in the form of dis­tant thun­der­storms to the north.  I’ve been sit­ting on the couch lis­ten­ing to the thun­der and watch­ing the light­ning light up the sid­ing of the house next door through the high win­dows in my par­ents 1920s Arts & Crafts Bungalow-​​style home.  Everything here is hard­wood, rich and brown, stone tiled fire­places, antique fur­ni­ture.   It’s a nice and wel­come change from twelve hours in the plas­tic and vinyl womb-​​like space of a mod­ern car.

But the drive itself is peace­ful if noth­ing else, but also full of his­tory and the kind of beauty only some­one who grew up on the plains can appre­ci­ate, per­haps.   I hit the free­way south to Denver at 8 AM and made good time around the metrop­o­lis and onto the Long Shot east.  The first hour of the drive is typ­i­cal Colorado dri­ving.  On my left, farm­lands and fields stretch­ing to the hori­zon.  On my right, the foothills give rise quickly to the Rocky Mountains, wreathed in heavy clouds that her­alded the snow.

Past Denver, the moun­tains recede into the rearview mir­ror as quickly as the traf­fic.   If I were to drop you on a ran­dom spot between Denver and the Kansas bor­der along I-​​70, you would not be able to tell whether you were in  Kansas or Colorado.  You’d prob­a­bly say Kansas.  I wouldn’t blame you.

Eastern Colorado is eas­ily my least favorite leg of the trip.  The towns and the farms are few and far between.  The range here is just empty and flat, the kind of flat every­one asso­ciates with Kansas even if they’ve never been there.  Nebraska-​​flat.  It always takes me longer to reach the Kansas bor­der than I expect.

Seeing the small “Welcome to Kansas” sign next to the weigh sta­tion at the bor­der never fails to make me smile.  It’s not osten­ta­tious  like the much larger and browner “Goodbye from Colorado” sign that her­alds it.  It’s small, just big enough for the words, and easy to miss (although I never miss it).  The sight never fails to relax some hid­den tensed mus­cles inside me, per­haps imag­ined mus­cles.   I almost feel like I have been hold­ing my breath since Denver, and can only take my first deep inhala­tion once I have passed Kanorado, Kansas.

The first third of the drive through Western Kansas is not so very dif­fer­ent than Eastern Colorado, as far as the grand vis­tas.  The dif­fer­ence I feel is purely psy­cho­log­i­cal.  Few trees, many fields, and towns announc­ing their pres­ence on the hori­zon with either the steeple of a church or a grain silo (or both).  At this time of the year, I see my first green fields near Goodland.  Winter wheat, I sus­pect, planted many months ear­lier, already turn­ing into a ver­dant car­pet over the slightly rolling landscape.

It is on this part of the road that you had have an audio­book or a music album that you can lose track of your­self within.  The dri­ving is not chal­leng­ing.  The land­scape is inter­est­ing only to the most Kansan of Kansans and the afi­cionado of grain silos and early 20th cen­tury church archi­tec­ture.   But as you progress east, things begin to get more inter­est­ing to the dis­cern­ing eye–such as mine, trained by the drive I’ve been mak­ing in some form since I was 7 years old.

Once you pass a series of farm com­mu­ni­ties, it’s open land until Hays, a small col­lege town in Postrock coun­try.  When this area was first set­tled, wood was in very short sup­ply, but yel­low lime­stone was free to quarry from any hill­side.  As you grow closer to Hays, Kansas, you begin to notice these weath­ered, warped, and worn stone posts, non­func­tional relics that define prop­erty lines but are backed up by the more tra­di­tional barbed wire fences.  It is here in this part of the state that the grass seems to grow more wild, and you begin to see the aban­doned farm­steads.   Every fifty miles or so, you can catch a close-​​up look at the rel­a­tively unchanged remains of a lime­stone farm­house, or a rot­ted and dilap­i­dated barn.   Old-​​fashioned wind­mills turn on the wind beneath the tow­er­ing alabaster blades of their power-​​generating descen­dants.    traf­fic on the road is light,  and the road is so straight that even alone, you can soak in the sight of desolation.

They told us sto­ries in grade school about the fron­tier­swomen who set­tled out here with their fam­i­lies and were dri­ven mad by the soli­tude and the wind.   From the aban­doned struc­tures,  I won­der if ulti­mately, the wind and soli­tude drove them all away.

The other object of inter­est to keep your eyes from slip­ping closed are the hand-​​painted signs.   Some help­fully remind you that “abor­tion stops a beat­ing heart” with a crude red heart painted next to the words.   Others adver­tise an upcom­ing road­side attrac­tion that includes the world’s largest prairie dog and a five-​​legged steer among var­i­ous other ani­mals, no doubt kept in tiny pens  and half-​​starved.  Billboards have been errected here and there adver­tis­ing the ser­vices and restau­rants of towns some­times as much as two hun­dred miles ahead. Somehow, prob­a­bly per­haps due to the lack of stim­u­lus, you still remem­ber those signs when the adver­tise­ments arrive in your path.

You pass through Hays quickly enough, per­haps catch­ing sight of the statue of a ptero­dactyl, or see­ing the 100,000 dome of the Sternberg Museum, one of the best col­lec­tions of kansas ocean fos­sils on the planet.  You see, the real­iza­tion that livens my drive every time as I cross the nearly bar­ren expanse is that all of this, from hori­zon to hori­zon, was once a giant inland ocean, and home to some of the dead­liest aquatic preda­tors that ever lived on earth–the mosasaurs.  One of the great ironies of Kansas is that so many of its res­i­dents flatly deny evo­lu­tion and beleive in a 2,000 year old Earth while, directly beneath their feet through­out most of the state, are 30 mil­lion year old ocean fos­sils that can only be explained in their belief sys­tem by accus­ing the stones of being planted by Satan him­self to make the hard-​​working folks ques­tion their faith.

Kansas here, in this mid­dle part, is one giant fos­sil to me.  I can­not help but pic­ture behe­moth forms sail­ing through the air above me, of mas­sive hub-​​cap-​​sized clams open­ing and clos­ing in invis­i­ble cur­rents along­side the road. I am dri­ving along the bot­tom of a ghostly ocean here.

Hays passes almost too quickly, and here is where the land­scape begins to grow more rough.  Once Salina is fad­ing behind you, small hills begin to rise from the land­scape.  Rivers weave between them, dressed in the fringes of trees only just now begin­ning to have a haze of green upon their branches.  If you were to swing south to Witchita, you would drive through a series of hills impres­sive to even a Colorado res­i­dent.  The Flint Hills were what I thought moun­tains looked like when I was younger. they’re not really that far off in some ways, up close.

I do not swing south, but con­tinue to the east.  The trees grow denser.  The hills rise and fall, form­ing ridges along­side the road.  I pass Fort Riley and its Army-​​green heli­copters with blades echo­ing the giant wind tur­bines from hun­dreds of miles back.  then Manhattan, the “lit­tle apple”  as adver­tised in bill­boards, and home of Kansas State University.  Purple-​​colored Wildcat ter­ri­tory.  And then, not so long after that, some­times more quickly than I expect, the urban blight of Topeka stretches out before me.  I say blight, because I know the city’s heart, and it is rot­ten to the core, a dirty, filthy place with few redeem­ing val­ues.  As I pass through, even from the inter­state I can see boarded up houses on the fringes of the emptied-​​out down­town.   It’s not so bad as decay­ing metrop­o­lises like Detroit, but it smells like death just the same.

Then the turn­pike, a toll-​​road to Kansas City, which I only take as far as Lawrence.  From there, I cut around the edges of town, past Clinton Lake (not named after the pres­i­dent), where I spent dozens of early Saturdays as a teen wish­ing with my father and my brother and sis­ter in my father’s boat.

Somewhere just out­side of Topeka, the mem­o­ries begin to take effect, and I see not only things as they are, but how they were when I was younger.  The growth and expan­sion shines brightly in my minds eye,  bright that hurts and makes me ache with an emo­tion I can only call nos­tal­gia.   Lawrence is where the mem­o­ries begin to crowd out the real­ity of things, and the way things were seem more sub­sta­nial than the way things are.

Lawrence whizzes by, the hill where Kansas University tow­ers above every­thing else in the area shrinks until it is no big­ger than you thumb, and I swing south on Highway 59.  Here, I think about my friend Niles and how I would take this road to his house nearly every week­end when I wasn’t work­ing in high school.  He was the first friend I ever had that could see through the bull­shit we tell our­selves and tell me what I really wanted or thought.  Such a skill is valu­able as a friend.  Last I had heard, he’d fled to Canada to escape jail in NYC.   I pass his home and wince to see that what was once a house on five acres is now crowded by a dozen more houses.  Even here your neigh­bors are closer than they were twenty years ago.

I’ve never taken this road before beyond Niles’ house, I real­ize, and soon I’m dri­ving a glacially slow 30 mph through Ottawa.  A county seat, it fea­tures an aston­ish­ingly beau­ti­ful cour­t­house from the Victorian period, dot­ted with stat­ues of lady Justice and spires and weird tower struc­tures.  I’ll try to take pic­tures when I pass back through again later.

Just past Ottawa, I turn east again, now on the mythically-​​named John brown Highway, push­ing towards the Missouri bor­der.  Here, I see even more aban­doned build­ings crum­bling and decay­ing.  I see old school houses with their bell tow­ers col­lapsed, burned out homes, and barns lean­ing so far that you would think a horse stomp­ing its foot would turn it into a pile of rub­ble.  I roll down the win­dow to smell the sharp tang of grass­fire as farm­ers clear away the growth on fal­low land to allow the green to come through with the rain.

I see all this in the golden light of a low sun behind me.  The land­scape now  has turned bril­liant green.  It reminds me of noth­ing so much as the English coun­try­side.  My mother first made this obser­va­tion on the road to Bath from London a few sum­mers ago while think­ing about how her father, a desert-​​raised boy from Arizona, sta­tioned in England in the mil­i­tary, had come to set­tle down and raise his fam­ily in Topeka.  Our Kansas is not so dif­fer­ent from that place in appear­ance, as strange as it sounds.

Soon, John Brown Highway deposits me in the slowly dying town of Osawatomie, sur­rounded by rivers prone to flood­ing, once a thriv­ing town home to the state men­tal hos­pi­tal.  Now, many of its store­fronts are closed or boarded up, and the homes up for auc­tion, or for the lucky ones, just for sale.  Osawatomie wears the state of the econ­omy on its face like a domino mask.  I have arrived.

A good sound­track makes it all go by faster, and good con­ver­sa­tion even faster.  I don’t like mak­ing the drive alone very often, and I dread it up until after the sec­ond or third hour, and then I remem­ber.  I’m going home.  These road­ways might as well be the veins in my arm, I know them so well.

It feels good to come back.  Most peo­ple could never under­stand why I would ever want to come here at all.  Its beauty is not loud.  It is under­stated, like that sign at the bor­der.  All along the way, it whis­pers “wel­come home,” in a voice as soft as the wind blow­ing through the corn. I can’t really blame you if you can’t hear it like we can.