Archive for the ‘Tutorial’ Category

Quick Tip: A Unique Solution to the Author Bio Dilemma

Posted on:

When you pub­lish a story, they usu­ally ask you for an author’s bio–just a short some­thing about your­self.   Did you know that a lot of the time, they’ll let you write absolutely ANYTHING in those suck­ers?   Online, espe­cially, they don’t seem to really care that much what’s in it.

This is a loop­hole a pro­lific writer can exploit.  Take a really nice 500 word flash fic­tion story, a fic­tional his­tory of a fic­tional you, per­haps, and chop it up into 50 word incre­ments.  Label each piece (Part 1 of 10) and so on at the start or end of the text.  Let cool for 20 min­utes.  Now you have 10 ready-​​made bios to go out with your next ten short story sales.    At the very least, you’ve saved your­self the time spent ago­niz­ing over whether to write about your­self in first per­son or third per­son, and whether you should men­tion your cats or not.  And you’re being cre­ative, instead of cut­ting and past­ing the last one you used, updat­ing it to remove divorced spouses, dead pets, or jobs you no longer have.

The best part, how­ever, is that you’ve also cre­ated a trea­sure hunt/​puzzle quest in your read­ers.  “Huh,” they will say.  That bio was weird.  Part 3 of 10, you say?  I really need to col­lect the other 9 parts.”  It’s viral mar­ket­ing! Wow, I just threw up a lit­tle in my mouth as I typed the v-​​word.

There is a risk is that your writ­ing career will crap out and you’ll only get 3 or 4 of the 10 pub­lished, but that’s a risk we all run in cre­ative endeav­ors. Keep at it, and I think you’ll get them all out there.

I almost want to get writ­ing a bunch of short fic­tion again just so I can try this idea.  If you do it, let me know how it goes for you. I fig­ure only a cou­ple of us will get to pull this off before they start clos­ing the loophole.

Admittedly, this is a silly idea, so if you think it’s ridicu­lous, know that it was pre­sented thor­oughly tongue-​​in-​​cheek.

How to get Images Back out of Microsoft Word

Posted on:

One thing I run into some­what fre­quently is con­tent being pro­vided to me in a Microsoft Word file with embed­ded images.  I used to strug­gle with get­ting the high­est qual­ity ver­sion of those images back out of Word and into Photoshop.  If you cut and paste into Photoshop, you often get it at the res­o­lu­tion it’s been scaled down to, and often, the col­ors are wrong or even the aspect ratio is messed up.  The solu­tion is sim­ple and hav­ing stum­bled upon it,  it is going to save me  plenty of time.  Maybe it can save you some time too.

The Solution

File->Save as->HTML

(I know, *shud­der* at the thought of Word’s HTML.  But we don’t need that!)

Word gen­er­ates an images folder and cre­ates a gif and a jpeg of each image at the max­i­mum res­o­lu­tion. I was able to pull full 300 dpi pho­tos from word files with this tech­nique with none of the image screw-​​ups that you get when you try copy­ing and pasting.

It’s just that easy.  Do you know of a bet­ter way to get those embed­ded images out of Microsoft Word?  Let me know in the comments!

Five Things I Have Learned About Wildlife Photography

Posted on:

For a lit­tle over a month, I have spent every week­end morn­ing and some after­noons after work out pur­su­ing local wildlife to pho­to­graph.  I’m not inex­pe­ri­enced when it comes to spot­ting and observ­ing wildlife, but throw­ing pho­tog­ra­phy into the mix has forced me to relearn a lot of old skills and add new ones to my toolkit.

1. You will never have enough reach.

I thought that buy­ing my 70-​​300mm lens (equiv­a­lent to a 600mm on a stan­dard  crop cam­era) would finally give me that power that I had always wanted.  I day­dreamed about sit­ting com­fort­ably in a lawn chair on a hill and tak­ing por­traits of ani­mals hun­dreds of yards away.  Without hav­ing looked through a lens and seen just how much mag­ni­fi­ca­tion I could get, i had no idea what to expect until I put the lens on the cam­era.  At first, I was dis­ap­pointed.  To take the kinds of ani­mal shots I wanted, I still had to get much closer than I imag­ined.  But slowly, I real­ized, I still had to get close, but not as close. I had more dis­tance between me and my sub­ject, which meant I had an even bet­ter chance of get­ting my shots before my sub­ject became uncom­fort­able and fled.

I could buy a tele­con­verter and dou­ble that at the cost of a full f-​​stop, and I might, some day.  But if you’re like me and can’t afford the ten thou­sand dol­lar fast zoom lenses, then you will prob­a­bly never be sat­is­fied with your reach.  There will always be a per­fect shot you just can’t get close enough to get.  You learn to make do, and how to get the shots you <em>can</em> get.

2. Good things hap­pen when you have patience.

It’s been a strug­gle for me, because I have that hunter’s instinct.  I don’t feel like I’m work­ing if I’m not mov­ing around, try­ing to come into con­tact with birds and ani­mals.  But when I can calm myself down and set­tle into one spot, be in the moment and take in the sights, the scene around you comes to life.  A mov­ing human is much more threat­en­ing and vis­i­ble than one who is rel­a­tively motion­less.  So far, my best shots have been taken while I was relax­ing in the grass on the banks of ponds, just soak­ing in the sun­light.  Its almost like the ani­mals can sense your des­per­a­tion and they taunt you by run­ning away.  When you relax, they do too.  I know that’s a bit of an anthro­po­mor­phiza­tion, but there’s some truth to it too.

3. You are not a silent ninja.

I am fairly good at keep­ing quiet in the wild.  I’ve spent good chunks of my life track­ing game for fun and work­ing on my skills at mov­ing qui­etly in under­brush.  I may be quiet by aver­age human stan­dards (and when I go out with oth­ers, I am con­stantly reminded of how much qui­eter I am by the stomp­ing and tromp­ing oth­ers do).  However, I am not a silent ninja that can sneak up on, well, any­thing but the most pre-​​occupied ani­mals.  In the wild, most ani­mals are on the look out for preda­tors.  They’re con­stantly in dan­ger, and their atten­tion is focused because of that.  You may think you can slowly, slowly sneak up on that beaver, but he knows you’re there already.  He knew you were there before you were aware of him.  He sim­ply hasn’t decided if you are a threat or not.  Nine times out of ten,  threat dis­tance is the same as how close you need to be to get your shot.  Funny how that works.

4. Get up early.  Really early. No, ear­lier than that.

Most ani­mals are active at dawn and dusk.  I think it’s a mat­ter of safety.  A lot of ani­mals are active at night, but there isn’t an ISO high enough to take those pic­tures, so we’re stuck using at least some form of sun­light most of the time.   I find that I have very lit­tle luck at dusk, and that’s because the areas I fre­quent are fre­quented by other humans as well.  By the end of the day, count­less peo­ple with dogs have been through the area, trau­ma­tiz­ing my sub­jects.  They flee the area to much more inac­ces­si­ble locales.

But at dawn, or just before it, things are qui­eter.  Sane peo­ple stay in bed.  I find it’s a good idea to get up well before sun­rise, get to your loca­tion, set­tle into a good spot, and then wait.  The area will come alive and sur­prise you.  And plus, the light will look much cooler at a low angle, improv­ing your shots con­sid­er­ably.  When the sun is high and bright over­head, you get much deeper, less inter­est­ing shadows.

5. Know your cam­era and lens.

All of the above will be for naught if you do not know your lens and camera’s capa­bil­i­ties and lim­i­ta­tions.  At full exten­sion, my lens is only capa­ble of f5.6.  This is not a very fast lens.  Dialed to this, you’re not get­ting a whole hell of a lot of light.  And remem­ber the rule of thumb that your shut­ter speed should at least be equal to that of your mm, and take your crop fac­tor into con­sid­er­a­tion.  So when I am shoot­ing at 300mm, my shut­ter speed needs to be 1/​600th of a sec­ond to min­i­mize cam­era shake when not using a tri­pod.  I didn’t believe this rule of thumb until I took a cou­ple of days worth of slightly blurry pho­tos.  I carry a tri­pod with me, but you don’t always have a chance to set it up, so you should know how to take an in-​​focus, prop­erly exposed shot with your lens with­out one.

Now, at the time of day we’ve dis­cussed, get­ting a 1/​600th or faster shut­ter speed isn’t easy if want a prop­erly exposed shot.  This means you have to change your sensor’s light sen­si­tiv­ity, the ISO.  The higher the ISO, the more noise, but also, the less light you need to get an exposed shot.

I have learned that with my lens and cam­era, I have to shoot at ISO 400 to get the shut­ter speeds I need to shoot fully zoomed in in the light I am usu­ally deal­ing with.  If it’s over­cast, I am basi­cally screwed, because the noise above ISO 400 on my Olympus is unac­cept­able, and I really, really hate shoot­ing with tripods when your sub­ject can run or fly away any second.

I’ve learned to be much more aware of my camera’s set­tings. I don’t always shoot in man­ual, but I do more so now than I ever have before.  I gen­er­ally shoot in aper­ture pri­or­ity mode, bring­ing my aper­ture down until I get the shut­ter speed I need.  Most of the time, I want the bokeh that comes with hav­ing a nar­row aper­ture any­way, unless I am shoot­ing macro work.  But that’s the sub­ject for another post.

Concluding Thoughts

The more you’re out there shoot­ing, the more you learn about your sub­jects.  I shoot wildlife pho­tog­ra­phy because I find nature the most beau­ti­ful thing there is, and I want to share the beauty I see out there with oth­ers. My cam­era is a kind of Noah’s ark.  I want to get two of every­thing inside it.   With this tips, hope­fully, you can come closer to nature too.

CSS Tutorial: Cleaning Up Footer Code

Posted on:

For my first web design/​css tuto­r­ial, I wanted to talk about a prob­lem that I had, and how I solved it. This is pretty sim­ple stuff, but it took me a while to grasp the idea, so I thought I’d share it with the half-​​dozen of you who do this sort of work.

Below is a screen cap­ture of a footer of a blog I’m design­ing for a client. Typically, I like to include the nav­i­ga­tion redun­dantly at the bot­tom of a page so that, rather than scrolling back to the header, a user can jump to wher­ever they want to go next. You’ll see this kind of basic redun­dant nav­i­ga­tion in a lot of places.

The Footer of a Client\'s Website

The lit­tle line between links is called a pipe, and as a sep­a­ra­tor, it is pretty com­mon. It’s just a sim­ple lit­tle visual ele­ment to help delin­eate between the nav items. The trou­ble comes in when you want to use these in com­bi­na­tion with dynam­i­cally gen­er­ated code from WordPress.

The List Code

First off, nav­i­ga­tions should pretty much always be a list in html. That’s what lists are for, and styling them is great and easy. And, coin­ci­den­tally, WordPress returns a call for pages with list code. So the HTML for this list of links looks like this:

<ul>
<li><a href="#" title="Home">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="#" title="Blog">Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="#" title="Fiction">Fiction</a></li>
<li><a href="#" title="Other Writing">Other Writing</a></li>
<li><a href="#" title="About Rudi">About Rudi</a></li
</ul>

I stripped out some classes that WordPress adds auto­mat­i­cally, as I don’t need them here. All of the above is con­tained in a div with an id of #footer. So, note that nowhere in that code is the pipe ite­self. That’s because I am adding the pipe with CSS. You can add char­ac­ters with CSS, you ask? Yep!

The CSS

#footer ul {list-style-type:none; position:absolute;
            left:300px; top:27px; font-size:16px;}
#footer ul li {display:inline; color:#e3bd8e;}
#footer ul li:after {content:" |";}

So what’s going on here? First of all, I am using Eric Meyer’s CSS Reset above this, so all of that default padding and styling on a list has been stripped. This means the only styling that hap­pens is the styling you want, and it cre­ates a base­line between browsers. It really makes my job easier.

So we’re styling the list itself to have no bul­lets, and we’re posi­tion­ing it absolutely within the con­tainer. You don’t have to do that, but I just found it eas­ier for my needs in this par­tic­u­lar footer. Next, I wanted the list all on one line, so I added display:inline. Finally, I’m using the pseudo class :after and the prop­erty con­tent to insert a space and the pipe after each item on the list. Say my client wants these items sep­a­rated instead by an aster­isk? Easy enough to change across the entire site with that one line.

Pseudo classes aren’t some­thing I often use, so the next thing I wanted to do tripped me up. The code above will add a pipe after each li tag, but I don’t want one on the last one. There’s no rea­son for it. How in the world do I do that? I know how to use the :last-​​child pseudo class, but it alone wouldn’t let me remove the pipe. Turns out, you can and should chain together pesudo classes

#footer ul li:last-child:after {content:" ";}

I prob­a­bly could have set that to content:none as well, now that I think about it. But a plain space in my case works just fine.

So there you have it. The moral of the story? Chain pseudo classes together to get what you want. Any questions?

Related Links:

Anatomy of a Steampunk Photoshoot

Posted on:

This was my first seri­ous shoot with logis­tics involv­ing a model, cos­tum­ing, and a shoot loca­tion. To spend an hour and a half behind the cam­era, I spent prob­a­bly 4 hours doing the var­i­ous admin­is­tra­tive tasks to set up. Here’s an overview of the process we went through to get the pic­tures I wanted.

The Model

A cou­ple of weeks ago, I posted a gen­eral cast­ing call on a site that con­nects pho­tog­ra­phers, make-​​up artists, and mod­els called Model Mayhem. I received quite a few responses, but most of them were from mod­els in the Denver area, which pre­sented logis­ti­cal prob­lems. I offered $15 an hour as my rate. I received prob­a­bly a dozen or so inter­ested responses, and I con­tinue to receive responses over time. Michelle was the stand-​​out of the group, and also, was local, a huge plus.

The prob­lem with a site like Model Mayhem is that there tends to be a bit of homogeny in the look and age ranges of the mod­els. Many, if not most, of the mod­els are young women in their 20s. This is fine for some of my needs, but I also need older mod­els, and male mod­els.
Continue read­ing ›