Archive for the ‘SF Publishers’ Category

The decline of print around these parts

Posted on:

I bought two iPads the day they were released.  Prior to own­ing one, our house­hold bought some­thing in the neigh­bor­hood of 75–100 books a year.  In the early 2000s, I did a lot of read­ing of short fic­tion mag­a­zines on a Sony Clie PDA, but when I upgraded to a crappy Windows-​​based smart phone that crashed con­stantly and lost my place, I gave up on eread­ing for a few years.   Anyway, I’ve bought less than a tenth of that in print books this year, look­ing through my receipts, and it’s clear that once I had an iPad, my pur­chas­ing habits shifted.

The only print books I buy are books I really want but aren’t avail­able in the Kindle store, or tech­ni­cal man­u­als with lots of illus­tra­tions or where care­ful line for­mat­ting really mat­ters to under­stand­ing code exam­ples.  And that’s only if I can’t get a PDF of those. As far as fic­tion goes, I have con­verted 100% over to Kindle, and my pur­chases are on track to match or exceed what I was buy­ing in print.

My wife is slightly slower to make the change, but the avail­abil­ity of clas­sic fic­tion for free in the iBook­store has changed her read­ing habits as well.  I see from look­ing at iTunes that she’s down­loaded a cou­ple dozen books that are in the pub­lic domain.  She hasn’t been big on the Kindle yet, but I sus­pect this is more related to her being in grad­u­ate school than because she’s not mak­ing the jump to e-​​books.

All it took to finally push me to com­plete eBook pur­chas­ing was a store where most every­thing I wanted was avail­able and a large color screen capa­ble of doing more than just e-​​books.  Its so con­ve­nient to be able to pop into Amazon any time I hear about a book I want, find out if it’s avail­able, and buy it with one-​​click shop­ping.  I’ve always got a few books on deck.  Something about the iPad means I read more and more quickly lately as well, but I can’t place exactly what about it does that.  Sheer nov­elty, maybe. 

Also, I’m really tired of the huge boxes of books every time we move.

I don’t think I could have done it with the Kindle device itself, or any e-​​paper device really.  I under­stand why most of the e-​​paper afi­ciona­dos go that route, but it’s slow­ness of refresh was the deal breaker for me.

There’s this def­i­nite feel­ing in the air that things are chang­ing rapidly, tip­ping past the tip­ping point.  More and more of the work I do as a web designer involves set­ting up places to help mar­ket or sell e-​​books.  It’s really great to see this new elec­tronic renais­sance hap­pen­ing in pub­lish­ing.  The web brought one big wave of change, and lower-​​cost e-​​readers is bring­ing yet another.

How do you feel about this shift?  Are you mak­ing the change as well, or are you stick­ing to paper?

5 Lies Writers Believe About Editors

Posted on:

At least in the sci­ence fic­tion com­mu­nity, there’s a lot of false com­mu­nity wis­dom float­ing around about the edi­to­r­ial process.  Some of them may have been true once.  Some were prob­a­bly invented to mess with the heads of noobs.   Some of them are care­fully nutured lies, like Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.   Well, no longer.  I’m here to tell you the truth, no mat­ter how ugly it may be.

LIE #1:   Editors give every story fair con­sid­er­a­tion. OR:  Editors reject sto­ries with­out read­ing them at all.

The truth is, the slush is deep, and it’s rarely an editor’s favorite part of the job.  Why do you think so many places have slush readers?

Every story doesn’t get fair con­sid­er­a­tion.  Not every story deserves it.  If you can’t be both­ered to read the sub­mis­sion guide­lines and fol­low them, it’s an easy rejec­tion.  If you have five gram­mar and spelling mis­takes in the first two para­graphs, it’s an easy rejec­tion.    If it’s a story about vam­pires, and I hate vam­pire sto­ries, it’s mostly an easy rejection.

Most sto­ries get at least a page out of me. Then I skip to the last 3 para­graphs, if I’m feel­ing gen­er­ous.   Some get less.   Some work is so obvi­ously bad that it’s star­tlingly easy to know it’s not going to work.  But every story gets looked at.  Nothing ever gets rejected with­out being par­tially read.  Honest.

LIE #2:  Editors never reject a good story.

I rejected plenty of really good sto­ries at the Fortean Bureau.   I’ve even rejected a cou­ple at Escape Pod.  The rea­son is pretty sim­ple: edi­to­r­ial vision or scope.   The Fortean Bureau was look­ing for a par­tic­u­lar kind of story.  Your space opera, no mat­ter how good, was never going to appear there.  Likewise, we don’t accept hor­ror or fan­tasy at Escape Pod.   If the story is good, and sucks me in, I will rec­om­mend send­ing it over to the other editors.

Stories get rejected for being too long, too short, too sim­il­iar to another story the edi­tor has already bought… there are as many rea­sons for rejec­tion as there are sto­ries.  And not all of them involve you mak­ing mis­takes.  There are aspects of the process that a writer can­not con­trol.  Best to just relax about it.

LIE #3:  Editors don’t fos­ter new writ­ers like they did in the old days, and don’t care about new talent.

John W. Campbell was a med­dle­some bas­tard who sent his writ­ers spe­cific ideas for sto­ries.  He was not what you call a “hands off” kind of edi­tor.  He wrote his fair share of sto­ries, and some of the tales I’ve heard about him make me think that he was often think­ing as a writer as much as he was an edi­tor.  He wasn’t afraid to rewrite some­one else’s story.

For what­ever biz­zare rea­son, some peo­ple wish edi­tors would take that level of inter­est in their work, and  they lament that edi­tors no longer fos­ter new writ­ers, giv­ing them the kind of con­struc­tive crit­i­cism that leads to their per­sonal growth.  Everything for writ­ers was just won­der­ful back then but these edi­tors today are jerks!

Not true.  Campbell may have had time to do this with a larger per­cent­age of his sub­mis­sions, but the field was smaller then.  Today, there are tens of thou­sands of writ­ers all try­ing to break in to the same pub­li­ca­tions.  We sim­ply don’t have time to give per­sonal feed­back to each sub­mis­sion.  These days, some­times the best you get is an encour­ag­ing rejec­tion.  My first came from Stanley Schmidt: “I like your writ­ing, so I hope you will send more in the future.”  Not very spe­cific, but it does the trick.  It tells you that you’re on the right track.

As much as I give Gordon van Gelder a hard time for his oppo­si­tion to online media, the man writes a very suc­cinct and help­ful rejec­tion let­ter.     Even the form let­ters have a sys­tem to them to help you fig­ure out why the story was rejected.  I always simul­ta­ne­ously feared and looked for­ward to his short notes.

Editors do build a sta­ble of writ­ers.  The rea­son most peo­ple don’t see it is because by the time you come along, the edi­tor has already estab­lished a group of authors he or she can count on.  But short story writ­ers in par­tic­u­lar are always going on to write nov­els, so open­ings do occur from time to time.

If you really want feed­back on your work, join a work­shop or cri­tique cir­cle.  It’s not the editor’s job to help you become a bet­ter writer.  Sometimes, we’re help­ful, but we can’t do it for everyone.

LIE #4:  Editors are peo­ple too.

Editors are just like us.”  No, we’re not. You don’t have a nev­erend­ing stream of bad writ­ing com­ing at you day in, day out.    You get to read for plea­sure, select­ing mate­r­ial that has been through at least one fil­ter.  Whereas you turn on the tap and get a stream of nice drink­able water,  we put our mouths to a sewer pipe and hope to get at least one swal­low that won’t give us rag­ing diarrhea.

I know the sen­ti­ment of the phrase is meant to imply that we’re not god­like arbiters of taste, mak­ing and break­ing careers on a whim.    But edi­tors do wield power.  And it changes us.  Generally it makes us ill-​​tempered and eas­ily dis­tracted by shiny objects.    I’ve yet to feel god­like, but I’m not rul­ing out the pos­si­bil­ity.  Maybe when some­thing I’ve pub­lished wins a Hugo, I will ascend to Asgard.

LIE #5:  Editors (and crit­ics) are failed writers.

As a rule, no.  A lot of us are mod­er­ately suc­cess­ful writ­ers.   Some of us have never wanted to write and never will.  There are a few who have started out as writ­ers and given it up for the editing/​publishing game (Gordon, I think), but not all of us have.

We’re not dri­ven to become edi­tors out of bit­ter­ness.  We all come to the posi­tion for dif­fer­ent rea­sons, but I think most of us start out as opti­mistic and hope­ful.  We think that maybe we have a vision for a type of story that nobody else has seen before.  We day dream about find­ing writ­ers that amaze us and pub­lish­ing them before any­one else.

It takes a pecu­liar sort of ego to take up edit­ing.  And thank god.  If it wasn’t for edi­tors, we’d all have to sort through the kind of self-​​published garbage that made it pos­si­ble for Geocities to stay in busi­ness for so long.  I shud­der to think of a world with­out editors.

And finally, a well-​​known truth:

You can bribe an editor.

Most of us are broke and dri­ven to drink copi­ous amounts of alco­hol.  See the sewer pipe anal­ogy above.  That gives us a weak­ness you can exploit.  Next time you’re at a con­ven­tion, go to the bar, and buy a drink for your favorite edi­tor.  Make sure you do it early on, because seven or eight drinks in, we’ll never remem­ber your name.   We’ll be lucky to wake up in the right hotel room, or even the right state.  Who bought the drinks on a night like that will be the least of our con­cerns when we wake up naked atop a desert mesa cov­ered from head to toe in blue paint.

Putting a name to a face, along with a men­tal data­base note of “bought me a beer” doesn’t hurt.  One of the things that makes edit­ing eas­ier is pre­tend­ing that the sto­ries aren’t all writ­ten by human beings with heart.  Sometimes, we have to put that out of our minds.  And if you find a way to politely shat­ter that illu­sion, well, it can be good for you.  But only if you are likely to start sell­ing sto­ries anyway.

There are no great secrets to being pub­lished.  Read lots.   Write sto­ries.  Lots and lots of sto­ries.  Submit the work until the sto­ries are either accepted or rejected by every mar­ket you could bear to see your name asso­ci­ated with.  That’s pretty much all there is to it.  Everything else is basi­cally unimportant.

How Can Your Computer Help You Write More, and Better?

Posted on:

The title is the ques­tion I’d like you to think about, my writer friends, estab­lished pros, aspir­ing authors, and any­one who car­ries a torch for the writ­ten word.    What could com­put­ers and tech­nol­ogy do to make the writ­ing life eas­ier for you?

Here are some ideas to get you started:

1.  I’d like (and am think­ing about build­ing) an online sub­mis­sion tracker soft­ware that’s as easy to use as Gmail and that can actu­ally rec­om­mend mar­kets to me for pieces.  I’d like it to track key­words asso­ci­ated with my work.  And after I sell a piece, I’d like to keep track of what rights I’ve sold, where to, and have it sug­gest reprint oppor­tu­ni­ties to con­sider.   In addi­tion, the site would pro­vide detailed sta­tis­tics on mar­kets, with graphs, culled anony­mously from user data.

2. I’d like this same soft­ware to track my head­count progress and help me set goals.  I’d like it to graph my pro­duc­tiv­ity, and com­pare it against the aver­age user of the site.   I’d like a sim­ple script to add to my site that will act as a word progress bar that updates itself auto­mat­i­cally based on what I enter in my software.

3. I’d like to be able to actu­ally load my sub­mis­sions into these pro­grams.  Then I’d like to tell it where I am sub­mit­ting next, and have it auto­mat­i­cally for­mat my cover let­ter and story in the pre­ferred for­mat and present it to me for printing.

4.  I’d like to be able to set a queue for each story, so that when a story is rejected, and I enter it into the soft­ware, it read­ies it for the next loca­tion auto­mat­i­cally.  Basically, automat­ing my workflow.

What else could your com­puter do for your writ­ing?  And yes, be fore­warned that I may bor­row your idea as a fea­ture for an appli­ca­tion I’m con­sid­er­ing building.

So what are some prob­lems you’d like to see solved?

Diamonds in the Sky: Free Hard SF Anthology

Posted on:

The anthol­ogy of astron­omy sto­ries I’ve been work­ing on for the last year or two, off and on, is finally com­pleted and avail­able: Diamonds in the Sky.

The anthol­ogy is free and you can go there now and read the sto­ries, most of which are orig­i­nal but a few of which are reprints from Analog or Asimov’s. Contributors include Hugo and Nebula award win­ning authors. Each story focuses on one or two key ideas from astron­omy and should have some edu­ca­tional value, but are hope­fully first and fore­most sim­ply enter­tain­ing and good qual­ity sto­ries. The project was funded by the National Science Foundation as a pub­lic edu­ca­tion and out­reach effort, and I’d like to reach as many read­ers as pos­si­ble so please spread the word!

via Mike Brotherton: SF Writer.

I did the web­site for Diamonds over a year ago.  This one has been a long time in the works, but it’s now finally live!

Roundbottom Research Publication

Posted on:

Harkening back to my post about crazy uncon­ven­tial zine ideas, and all this talk and thought about relaunch­ing the Fortean Bureau, has led me to give some seri­ous thought to try­ing some­thing very very different.

Roundbottom is my core project right now, but I have a strong desire to launch a new ‘zine. At the very least, I am going to pub­lish a few sto­ries in the Fortean Bureau for­mat, but what if… what if I cre­ated a meta pub­li­ca­tion like the Surreal Guide to Botany or the Disease Guide from a year or so back–but as a kind of naturalist’s research pub­li­ca­tion.  Nothing stuffy and dry like real sci­en­tific mag­a­zines, but basi­cally pay­ing other peo­ple to write posts like Dr. Roundbottom.  I’d accept sub­mis­sions from both artists and writ­ers. I’ll pro­vide a forum for artists and writ­ers to team up, if they want to make a joint pro­duc­tion of an article/​piece.

Art would be allowed in any for­mat.  Not every­one has to do the pho­tog­ra­phy thing that I’m doing.  But the basic idea behind all of this is that each arti­cle is writ­ten by another nat­u­ral­ist in their own world, sim­i­lar or dif­fer­ent to Dr. Roundbottom, but at least pass­ably steampunk.

To start, I’d offer $50 a post (not longer than 2000 words) for the writ­ing and $50 for the art.  You’d be free to sell both any­where, and we will pro­vide a link to sell prints at your print store for artists.   We’d have an option to pay more at the end of the year to pub­lish a print edi­tion of the research notes.

Finally, and I’d be doing the same, you have to allow–and I’m not sure how to legally for­mal­ize this–references to be made to your work and char­ac­ters in other submissions/​posts.  For instance, Dr. Roundbottom him­self might ref­er­ence your paper and link to it while talk­ing about some­thing sim­i­lar in his world.  And you’ll be able to do the same with Roundbottom.  This kind of shar­ing isn’t cov­ered under any kind of Creative Commons license that I know of, so per­haps I would need some odd con­tract legal­ize.  I should talk to the Creative Commons peo­ple and see if they have suggestions.

Would any­one sub­mit to some­thing like this?  I’m basi­cally think­ing about the com­ments that hap­pen already on Roundbottom and for­mal­iz­ing a way for writ­ers and artists to par­tic­i­pate in this fash­ion and get paid for it. I under­stand that it would be dif­fi­cult to sell any writ­ing writ­ten directly for htis project to any­thing else, so that’s one flaw that i have to con­sider.  Please pro­vide your thoughts and com­ments!  Would you sub­mit some­thing to this kind of pub­li­ca­tion?  What rules do you think would need to be made?

Print or Electronic Short Fiction Magazines?

Posted on:

There’s some great con­ver­sa­tion going on over at the Tor site about mag­a­zine mod­els again.  John Klima is tack­ling the whole print vs. elec­tronic delimma.

Personally, I think if you can do print, do it.  But elec­tronic edi­tions should be a given. It costs maybe an hour of your time to take your files and con­vert them into the pop­u­lar for­mats.  There are web­sites that do it for you. If any­one wants to know about those, I’ll dig up the links.

Cory Doctorow has talked about this in the past, and I agree with him.  Sell a nor­mal sub­scrip­tion for print, but those peo­ple get a free elec­tronic ver­sion as well.  The elec­tronic ver­sion sup­ports the print ver­sion.  It’s eas­ier to search, and, hon­estly, eas­ier to share, which at the size we’re talk­ing about?  People pirat­ing your sto­ries around is a good thing.  Anything that makes it eas­ier for peo­ple to spread the word about your pub­li­ca­tion is a plus.

Also, sell a cheaper straight elec­tronic ver­sion.  If some­one really wants to just get a PRC file every month, then let them.  But I think you’ll find that the elec­tronic ver­sion is a sell­ing point of the print ver­sion.  I can’t guar­an­tee it will increase sales, but I think it’s the best of both worlds.  It’s your choco­late in my peanut but­ter, my peanut but­ter in your choco­late.  Mmmm!

I’d be ecsta­tic if every book I bought came with an elec­tronic ver­sion so that I can search it after­wards, or even bet­ter, while I’m wait­ing for the book to arrive via Amazon.  In fact, yes­ter­day, I ordered some web appli­ca­tion design texts and after I placed my order, Amazon tried to sell me a $15 e-​​book copy of one of the books so I could start read­ing right away.  That’s great–only I sure as hell ain’t going to pay another $15 for a $50 book for that promise (and prob­a­bly find that it is full of DRM that pre­vents me from really using it).

There are things I can do so much bet­ter on a com­puter or e-​​reader than I can do with a book.  But paper is still eas­ier to read until we see e-​​ink really take off (the Kindle is appar­ently cool, but I’ve never seen one in the wild).    The two for­mats are com­pli­men­tary, and I’d really like to see some­one try out the model I’ve out­lined above.  I’d sub­scribe, any­way, and I cur­rently sub­scribe to no mag­a­zines (although that’s a fac­tor more of my recent unem­ploy­ment than it is any prob­lem with the magazines).

Are you pub­lish­ing a print zine and giv­ing away e-​​copies to your sub­scribers for archiv­ing and easy index­ing?  Let me know in the comments.

The Strange Horizons fund drive, with member card art by me

Posted on:

Strange Horizons, one of the internet’s longest run­ning pro­fes­sional online spec­u­la­tive fic­tion mag­a­zines, is com­pletely funded by dona­tions from read­ers like you and me.  They con­sis­tently pub­lish award-​​winning, inter­est­ing work.  Without our help, they would not be able to do so.

Donors receive prizes and gifts in addi­tion to a nifty mem­ber­ship card with art­work by a dif­fer­ent artist each year.  This year,  the editor-​​in-​​chief approached me about doing a pho­to­graph for the mem­ber­ship card.  I have given them a Roundbottom–style image called “The Dissection.”  It looks exactly like it sounds.  The only way you can See that image in all its glory is to donate to Strange Horizons!  If you’re a Roundbottom com­pletest, send money now.

This is, by the way, the “secret” image and pho­to­shoot that I was refer­ring to a while back.  I’m very happy with the way it turned out.  In case you’re won­der­ing, the beau­ti­ful model is my wife.  The woman hold­ing the scalpel is just some per­son I dragged in off the street for the shoot. I kid!    You can catch a glimpse of the image over on the 2008 fund drive page.  Go check it out and let me know what you think.  I’ve had it on my desk­top as wall­pa­per for weeks, and I really dig it.

Speaking of Desktop Wallpaper…

Is that some­thing any of you would be inter­ested in me mak­ing from some of my pho­tog­ra­phy?  If you want wall­pa­per, just let me know what image and what res­o­lu­tion, and I will make it for you and post it on the site.  I’ll prob­a­bly include my name and site URL in the lower right hand cor­ner, just as  a lit­tle bit of adver­tis­ing for me, but leave it oth­er­wise unadorned.   Post your thoughts in the com­ments, or email me directly.

Five Unconventional Zine Model Ideas

Posted on:

The Dream Zine?

I hear what you’re think­ing, “You mean your dream mag­a­zine wasn’t the Fortean Bureau?” At the time, it was every­thing I could make it be with the con­straints (finan­cial, con­tent, for­mat) I worked under. And even though the mag­a­zine is on semi-​​permanent hia­tus, I still fol­low the pub­lish­ing side of ‘zines, and I’m still com­ing up with ideas for what I would do dif­fer­ently the next time. Here are a few of the ideas that I can’t stop think­ing about and wanted to share with you and see what you think. Many of them shake up the way things work now in a fun­da­men­tal way. Don’t take these ideas as to be an assault on the old ways, your favorite mag­a­zines, or your favorite writ­ers. These are thought exper­i­ments and can’t do you any harm.

Play With the Creative Commons: The Story Factory

Many writ­ers have released con­tent under the Creative Commons license, giv­ing explicit per­mis­sion for the kind of shar­ing that can­not be stopped thanks to the real­i­ties of the web. I think we’ve gen­er­ally reached a point where most non-​​Luddites accept the web for what it is. Many of us are hop­ing there will still yet be a way to give away con­tent online and still make some money with­out being famous in the first place. But that’s another topic for another time. I want to talk about the other types of Creative Commons licenses as a foun­da­tion for a dif­fer­ent kind of magazine.

The idea here is to pub­lish work, and pay very well for it, under the stip­u­la­tion that it must be released under a cre­ative com­mons license that allows for com­mer­cial deriv­a­tives. Essentially– pay authors to open source a story entirely. That’s step one.

And in an acknowl­edg­ment that the line between writ­ers and fans has blurred, in step two, you solicit sub­mis­sions that are built with the open source tools pro­vided by your core writer. Each pub­lish­ing cycle, you have one new open-​​source piece, and the pre­vi­ous month’s deriv­a­tive works. If you want, use the orig­i­nal author to help select the issue’s sec­ondary wave content.

Step three, once a year, you accept sub­mis­sions that are deriv­a­tive from every­thing from the pre­vi­ous year, which includes all second-​​wave works too (which were required to be released under share-​​a-​​like licenses as well). So, you end up with the orig­i­nal, the first wave of deriv­a­tive works, and then a third wave of deriv­a­tive works that can draw from all of the above. Essentially, a CC-​​licensed enforced shared world process, paid for by the mag­a­zine. Creating a form of legal fan fic­tion, but with the gate­way of an edi­tor to ensure qual­ity. Authors can always play in the worlds they cre­ated, but they open those worlds up from the start for oth­ers too.

Underlying all of this is link­ing tech­nol­ogy that threads the sto­ries together on the site, mak­ing it easy to find related con­tent. Wind this sucker up, and watch it go. Sell adver­tis­ing as your rev­enue model, maybe. Or pos­si­bly use the fund drive model.

User-​​Selected Content: The Mob

Digg is a social web­site that selects its con­tent by user con­sen­sus. Each mem­ber of the site can dig or bury a story, and these cause con­tent to rise to the front page, where it is seen by hun­dreds of thou­sands of read­ers. Take this model and apply it to the pub­lish­ing of a zine, with some modifications.

First of all, you have an edi­to­r­ial board that applies loose stan­dards, weed­ing out the truly awful stuff. The work above a very basic level of com­pe­tency is paid a small fee, say $10, and held for fur­ther con­sid­er­a­tion, with a max­i­mum limit set.

Create a mem­bers only, password-​​protected area for your core fan­dom. They pay a small yearly fee to have priv­i­leged access to con­tent. Then you dump the incom­ing slush pile into the hop­per and your core fans go to town, rank­ing and rat­ing the sto­ries, ulti­mately, giv­ing it a thumbs up or a thumbs down. At the end of a pub­lish­ing cycle, you take the best-​​rated sto­ries, and you pay them a larger fee, and then you reject the rest.

Some pub­lish­ers will argue that being taken to the sec­ond level of con­sid­er­a­tion will con­sti­tute being pub­lished. An adopter of this model should remain neu­tral on the issue, say­ing that this assess­ment is up to the indi­vid­ual mag­a­zines. Your rec­om­men­da­tion would be–send your work as a last resort, if this is a con­cern you have. The details will fall out over time, and other edi­tors will decide how they feel about work that’s been through your system.

Go Really Multimedia: The Soup

Let’s face it. You auto­mat­i­cally limit your audi­ence by focus­ing on genre lit­er­a­ture. The web allows you to pub­lish any infor­ma­tion at all. Take advan­tage of that. Publish comics, videos, ani­ma­tions, Flash games, illus­tra­tions, audio plays. Publish all of it, and most impor­tantly, don’t sec­tion every­thing off into lit­tle ghet­tos. The illus­tra­tions are not sec­ondary to the sto­ries. Everything is pre­sented on an equal foot­ing. It’s all spec­u­la­tive art.

Accept reprints here. You prob­a­bly can’t afford to demand exclu­sive rights in per­pe­tu­ity from the video mak­ers or illus­tra­tors, and your best work is going to be stuff that’s been out on the web already. The value of your zine is not its exclu­siv­ity but in the way it aggre­gates the best con­tent together. A one-​​stop shop for all the SF things you like. There’s a wealth of artists work­ing in a vari­ety of medi­ums, and the peo­ple that are fans of each one of these medi­ums could poten­tially be brought together under one roof, and then you could see more cross-​​pollination. Video watch­ers occa­sion­ally read­ing a story, maybe? A lot of genre fans don’t even know genre mag­a­zines exist. Bring those peo­ple in with the other con­tent and expose them to great con­tent. It’s a win for everybody.

Publish and Fund Alternate Reality Games: The Metaverse

I’ve nat­tered on about ARGs in the past. Some of the genre’s best writ­ers are mak­ing a par­tial liv­ing writ­ing for really big bud­get ARG games for com­pa­nies like Microsoft or the Beijing Olympics. There’s no rea­son we can’t take the gen­eral model here and build a mag­a­zine around it, except that they are gen­er­ally mas­sive undertakings.

So limit their scope. Think of the pre-​​existing ARGs as nov­els in scope. Take the con­cept and bring the expe­ri­ence down to one that can be played out in a few hours, or a month, here and there. As a pub­lisher, you would pro­vide tools to facil­i­tate the cre­ation, as well as edi­to­r­ial guid­ance. Perhaps a social net­work­ing tool to encour­age ARG mak­ers with dif­fer­ent skillsets to col­lab­o­rate and cre­ate the projects. Once projects are com­pleted, they are then sub­mit­ted for review. You can choose to pay for the project and run it as your con­tent, or not. If not, the team can take their game and pub­li­cize it themselves.

I leave the fund­ing model as an exer­cise for the reader, because I don’t have a clue.

Help the Fans Put their Money Where their Mouth is: The Rocket-​​shaped Piggy Bank

A com­mon com­plaint among fans is that they can’t find the work that they want to read. So build a mag­a­zine that uses basic eco­nom­ics to deter­mine which authors you pub­lish. Underlying it is a social net­work­ing tool that allows fans to find other fans with com­mon autho­r­ial inter­ests. Coalitions can be formed, and a data­base of work­ing SF authors is pro­vided. Authors can take con­trol of their pro­files and pro­vide infor­ma­tion to the fans–but the main idea here is to say “here’s what I need to do what you want.”

Inspired by the site Fundable, you take the basic idea of group fundrais­ing that doesn’t take any money until the goal is met, and you make it pos­si­ble for fans to pool resources and directly con­tract with authors to write sto­ries. At least at first, the fundrais­ers prob­a­bly shouldn’t be able to require any­thing spe­cific about the work other than its author, but it’s pos­si­ble that you could open up the model so that a group could offer boun­ties on sto­ries with ele­ments they like. For instance, The Coalition For More Robots raises $500 in pledged dona­tions for a story fea­tur­ing the kind of robots Asimov used to write about. The Coalition must elect edi­to­r­ial lead­ers. These lead­ers then receive offers from authors and choose whether or not to accept them as meet­ing their fund require­ments. The sys­tem would han­dle all the money side of things in addi­ton to the social net­work­ing aspects.

Part of your job as an edi­tor would partly be con­tact­ing the authors who have funds raised request­ing work from them and let­ting them know your site exists. Most SF writ­ers have some access to the web, so this would be easy with at least a cer­tain tier of writer. I have a feel­ing that the kinds of funds we would see would be directed at much big­ger name authors, like Martin, King, etc. Those may present dif­fi­cul­ties. You would have to develop a black­list of authors who would not take com­mis­sion work from the site for any amount of money, maybe, but even with­out it, nobody is under any oblig­a­tion to accept the com­mis­sions that the site helps organize.

In Conclusion

Some of the above, per­haps all of them, would fail. There are cer­tainly prob­lems with each one that I haven’t gone into here. I may pos­si­bly expand on each of these ideas in future posts, exam­in­ing how they might suc­ceed, or not, and pay­ing atten­tion to what kinds of fund­ing mod­els could keep them run­ning. And hey, if you want to launch a busi­ness based on any of these, just give me an oppor­tu­nity to invest early on, that’s all I ask.

What do you think? Do any of them spark your imag­i­na­tion? What is your dream zine?

The Coming Online SF/​F Renaissance

Posted on:

Tor Will Make a Big Splash

A few years ago, we were all upset when SCIFICTION was dropped by the SciFi Channel. The genre lost its best pay­ing mar­ket, and arguably the high­est qual­ity pub­li­ca­tion, online or in print. Its depar­ture from the scene left a hole that many have tried to fill, to vary­ing degrees of suc­cess. But the world has changed sig­nif­i­cantly since then.

Today, nearly every pub­lisher, large or small, has some sort of online com­po­nent. No longer is dig­i­tal con­tent being largely ignored, as it was when I first came onto the scene in 2001. Baen, Prime Books, Small Beer Press, Tor, just to name a few that have recently or reg­u­larly released con­tent online for free. Tor’s com­ing social networking/​publishing site might be the final piece of the puz­zle that ties the SF/​F com­mu­nity together under one roof (depend­ing on the extent of their social net­work­ing tools). I eagerly await the chance to beta test their site.

SCIFICTION and Strange Horizons stood mostly unop­posed for a very long time. Smaller, respectable mar­kets flour­ished, but none of us had the audi­ences of these two pub­li­ca­tions. Baen came onto the scene, and shook things up, but I don’t know much about them because their model of the sub­scriber wall keeps me out. Tor is going to bring in the exist­ing online audi­ence, and I think they have the clout and sta­ble of authors to bring even more read­ers to online short fiction.

Tor’s entrance onto this stage is going to ele­vate everyone’s game. With a new giant player on the scene, the smaller pub­lish­ers are going to be work­ing harder to inno­vate, harder to stand out. We’ll see even more exper­i­men­ta­tion. We started out with the online fic­tion itself as the exper­i­ment. Tor’s entrance proves that experiment’s cen­tral the­sis. People will and do read fic­tion online, and in great num­bers. What’re more, I believe it val­i­dates the model of the short fic­tion as adver­tise­ment for long form pub­lish­ers. Prime Books, Clarkesworld, and Subterranean have pio­neered this.

I can’t help but think that we have Cory Doctorow to thank for much of this. I’m sure many peo­ple released books online for free before him, but did many who had tra­di­tional pub­lish­ing con­tracts release their books online in con­junc­tion with the print release? It’s almost cer­tainly his influ­ence that has led Tor to devel­op­ing their com­ing site–I’m sure oth­ers, such as Patrick Nielsen Hayden and semi-​​anonymous Tor employ­ees at who I do not know are ulti­mately respon­si­ble for the project, and I don’t want to min­i­mize what they are doing. But Cory blazed the path. That path is turn­ing into a paved road. Soon, it may be a highway.

Who Falls Behind?

I like the fic­tion in Asimov’s and F&SF very much, but they are begin­ning to look a bit like large warm-​​blooded bird ances­tors prone to mas­sive extinc­tion by meteor impact. F&SF has made some strides in the online world, with it’s free fic­tion and blog, but the fic­tion is mostly pretty old, prac­ti­cally ancient in online terms, and their pre­sen­ta­tion leaves much to be desired.

Asimov’s web pres­ence has not changed sig­nif­i­cantly since I first vis­ited their web­site. It’s a mess, frankly. It’s great that you can buy it for the near-​​mythic Kindle, and they’ve been avail­able in var­i­ous e-​​formats for a long time via Fictionwise. But they have utterly failed to take advan­tage of the web as a medium. And no, I do not count their sep­tic forums. I haven’t paid much atten­tion to Analog, but I sus­pect they’re in a sim­i­lar place, being owned by the same publisher.

What Next?

Who will make the next inno­va­tions in pub­lish­ing? I think it will still be the small, fleet-​​footed pub­li­ca­tions like Futurismic, Clarkesworld, Fantasy, and so on. Podcasting, once the sole domain of EscapePod, now has sev­eral other major play­ers on the field, even exclud­ing the var­i­ous EscapePod spin­offs. And remem­ber, their num­ber of lis­ten­ers out­weighs the read­er­ship of any print mag­a­zine out there. I also think that their lis­ten­ers are not the same peo­ple as the sub­scribers of mag­a­zines. It’s a com­pletely dif­fer­ent audi­ence, and ignor­ing the pod­cast audi­ence would be like throw­ing money away at this point. I pre­dict more will offer pod­cast­ing sup­ple­ments to their web pres­ences. Small pub­lish­ers will begin to inves­ti­gate devel­op­ing for the mobile web, and this may call for a dif­fer­ent type of fic­tion, some­thing shorter and leaner. The use of mul­ti­me­dia and art­work is going to grow. A sim­ple site like the Fortean Bureau looks like an Amish buggy com­pared to the hot rods we’ll be see­ing in the next cou­ple of years. I don’t know about you, but I’m very opti­mistic and excited about the things that are to come. We may not get paid much in the short fic­tion world, but there are more and more oppor­tu­ni­ties to con­nect with audi­ences. And for read­ers, there’s never been so many options for your read­ing expe­ri­ence (which presents its own set of prob­lems).

To Save SF Short Fiction, We Had to Destroy It

Posted on:

(Warning, the below is poorly thought out and writ­ten hastily. I will write more later this week.)
Doug Cohen has recently launched a sub­scribe to a SF mag­a­zine drive via his Livejournal.

I have a sus­pi­cion that telling the SF writ­ing blo­gos­phere to sub­scribe to short fic­tion mag­a­zines in an effort to save short fic­tion is like instruct­ing a bunch of buggy whip mak­ers to buy buggy whips to save the buggy whip man­u­fac­tur­ing indus­try.  I know Doug means well, and I don’t mean this as a crit­i­cism of him, but I am very doubt­ful that telling a small group of active online fan­dom to sub­scribe to mag­a­zines will make a bit of dif­fer­ence in the gen­eral decline.   I’ve been just as guilty

The gorilla in the room that we rarely acknowl­edge is that nobody wants to read short fic­tion.  If they did, then there wouldn’t be this mess. I’ve heard and read hand wav­ing about the changes in dis­tri­b­u­tion mod­els, but hon­estly, I don’t buy it.  In this day and age, if you have a burn­ing desire to read sci­ence fic­tion short sto­ries, you can Google up a mag­a­zine in less than a second.

Do I think that the pub­lic could be mar­keted towards to encour­age the read­ing of more short fic­tion? Maybe.  A good mar­ket­ing team can sell just about any­thing.  Do I think any­one has the money to back a large cam­paign like this?  No.  SFWA would be the only orga­ni­za­tion that I could see such an ini­tia­tive com­ing from, and they’re a mas­sive joke; an orga­ni­za­tion ded­i­cated to inter­nal pol­i­tics and rumor­mon­ger­ing more than the decline and col­lapse of the indus­try around it.

There is no solu­tion.  The public’s inter­est has moved on.  If you’re a writer, go write video games, movies, tele­vi­sion, or books, in that order of pop­u­lar­ity.  That is where the public’s inter­est is right now, and if you don’t like it, then I’m afraid that you should prob­a­bly get used to the idea that short fic­tion is a small, niche hobby of lit­tle impor­tance.  I’m fine with that.  I find that I enjoy writ­ing it, and that’s enough for me.  Short fic­tion for me is a way to learn writ­ing, but I won’t regret leav­ing it behind if I were to crack another (more pop­u­lar and bet­ter pay­ing) medium, or find some amal­gam of sev­eral of my own.

I don’t sup­port the record indus­try for its fail­ing busi­ness model. I don’t think the SF print mag­a­zine world deserve spe­cial treat­ment either.  I do, in fact sub­scribe to quite a few mag­a­zines.  But it’s not out of any effort to save them from the dust­bin. There’s plenty to read online, and will be as long as weirdos like me keep writ­ing it.

I’ve been around and around the fund­ing mod­els for online mag­a­zines in my head.  I’ve con­cocted the most ridicu­lous Web 2.0 mod­els for online pub­lish­ing that you can imag­ine.  But none of them will work, because there’s no evi­dence what-​​so-​​ever that there is enough pub­lic inter­est to jus­tify the build­ing of such a thing.  Every model fails, because there just aren’t enough peo­ple inter­ested in read­ing and sup­port­ing a mag­a­zine mon­e­tar­ily for it to even sus­tain itself.   Don’t quote Strange Horizons at me, either.  Their fund drive doesn’t seem to be doing too well this time around.

Science Fiction, meet the long tail.  It’s not the first, and it won’t be the last.