Archive for the ‘Featured Resource’ Category

To Rewrite or Not to Rewrite? That is the Flowchart.

Posted on:

I recently received a rewrite request for a story I had sub­mit­ted.  Over my time as a writer, I’ve received rewrite requests that I’ve accepted, and rewrite requests I have turned down–for a lot of dif­fer­ent rea­sons.  I real­ized that my think­ing that goes into the deci­sion of whether or not to do so is some­what com­plex, and I got to won­der­ing if it was some­thing that a flow­chart could describe.  After a lit­tle bit of play­ing around this morn­ing, I have cre­ated just such a flowchart.

rewriteflowchart

Click on the thumb­nail image to view the full size chart.  Did I miss any steps that you would have con­sid­ered?  Do you think I am insane for draw­ing up a flow­chart for some­thing like this?  Share your thoughts in the comments.


10 Ways to Have a More “Interesting” Convention Experience

Posted on:

I am not attend­ing WorldCon (AKA Anticipation)  this year.  Last year was great, and I met a lot of really inter­est­ing new peo­ple, and got to meet some peo­ple in the flesh for the first time like John Joseph Adams (whose col­lec­tion The Living Dead was nom­i­nated for a World Fantasy Award this week!  Congratulations are in order).   Why am I not going?  Well, there’s the finan­cial rea­sons of course, but there’s also a lit­tle dis­pute I had with the Canadian Border Control back in 1986 involv­ing the ille­gal impor­ta­tion of furry porn.  I’m not allowed to talk about it, but suf­fice to say, I can only travel to Canada under pseu­do­nyms such as Harrison T. Merriweather.  And now I can’t use that one.  Canada’s agents are everywhere.

It’s rather  too easy for the sea­soned con vet­eran to end up in a bit of a rut when it comes to cons.  “Find a seat in the bar and leave only for your pan­els” seems to be the writer/editor/publisher’s way.  I think they some­times actu­ally take in food in a solid form over the course of the con­ven­tion, but I have no evi­dence of this.

I’ve decided, as a ser­vice to the con­ven­tion goer, to pro­vide this help­ful list of activ­i­ties you can  par­tic­i­pate in to make your convention-​​going expe­ri­ence that much more interesting.

  1. In a very pub­lic space, ask Gord Sellar to imi­tate his Quebec-​​born mother.  (The result­ing mob will give you all the exer­cise you need for the week).
  2. Dress up as a polyp and jump out at Jay Lake every time you see him, yelling “Boo!”
  3. Squeeze Harlan Ellison’s boob.
  4. Walk up to Tempest, and whis­per, in a ner­vous voice.  “I see black people.”
  5. Go to a Gordon van Gelder panel and stand up to ask a ques­tion.  Congratulate him on finally break­ing down and accept­ing elec­tronic sub­mis­sions and start a stand­ing ova­tion.  Then flee. (Also, scratch F&SF off your sub­mis­sions list)
  6. Treat every­one in cos­play as you would treat their actual char­ac­ter.  Run in ter­ror from stormtroop­ers.  Try to res­cue Slave Girl Leia.  Laugh and point at Klingons.
  7. Ask Ted Chiang to tell you about the cover of his col­lec­tion.  (Only do this if you have 4 hours of time you need to kill).
  8. Find Cory Doctorow.  Secretly replace his iPod with a Zune.
  9. Dress up as the ghost of Robert Heinlein and demand roy­al­ties from John Scalzi all weekend.
  10. When they announce the John W. Campbell Award for best new writer, race to the podium, snatch the award, and smug­gle it home to ME.

Anyone else have any ideas to make those lucky folks attend­ing WorldCon have a more “fun” time?

Writing: Your Subconscious and You

Posted on:

I have a very rocky rela­tion­ship with my subconscious.

On the one hand, my sub­con­scious is the font of my best ideas.  Even when I writ­ing some­thing that has come mostly from ego-​​brain think­ing, it inserts cool things, catches ideas that I missed the first time around.  It’s some­times like hav­ing a bet­ter writer sit­ting on your shoul­der catch­ing your missed opportunities.

On the other hand,  my subconscious’s inter­ests are not always mar­ketable inter­ests.  My sub­con­scious feeds me sto­ries about Kansas about once a week.  The state needs to start writ­ing me checks for the PR.  Lord knows they need a pos­i­tive face what with all the wackos that pop­u­late my home state.  So I write a lot of sto­ries about Kansas or set in Kansas. I’ve yet to find a mar­ket for that stuff, and I doubt any­one wants to read about it.  And yet my sub­con­scious per­sists.  I’m wrestling with Potatohead (that’s what I call my sub­con­scious) right now about a story that involves mole men and Kansas.    Excited to read that one? Yeah, didn’t think so. I keep telling him, we need postsin­gu­lar­ity sto­ries that use the entire galaxy as their set­ting.  We need fan­tasy sto­ries that take place in the New York sub­way sys­tem.  What does he feed me?   A story about a woman whose abu­sive dead hus­band comes back made out of pota­toes after being buried int he garden.

Yeah, I actu­ally wrote that one.  The rejec­tion Nick gave it at Clarkesworld was enough to put me off writ­ing for a year.  Not one you’ll prob­a­bly ever read. There are a lot of these.

On rare occa­sions, one of us presents an  idea that the other finds just as fas­ci­nat­ing.  My story “The Yeti Behind Me”  is a good exam­ple.  The idea of ghosts of extinct ani­mals popped up in con­ver­sa­tion.  I felt the indi­ca­tion of Potatohead’s inter­est in the form of an explo­sion just behind my right eye.  Potatohead is not sub­tle.   But if we agree on some­thing straight away, I know it’s got legs.

Problem has been, lately, I have stopped trust­ing Potatohead.  He’s fix­ated on the same things much of the time.  He’s not giv­ing me ideas that I can get excited about.  And vice versa.  I spend all day think­ing of story ideas and ask­ing “Hey, Potatohead, what do you think of this one?”  His response is gen­er­ally a resound­ing “meh.”

I feel like the two parts of my brain are at war lately  Each one knows some­thing use­ful about writ­ing, but they are not agree­ing on things nearly often enough for me to feel like I’m mov­ing for­ward with my “career.”  I can write sto­ries based pri­mar­ily on the input of one half, but those sto­ries are flat, and aren’t going to take me anywhere.

There’s one other, unre­lated thing about Potatohead that ticks me off.  When I’m asleep, peo­ple can talk directly to Potatohead.  I have had long and var­ied con­ver­sa­tions in my sleep that I con­ciously have no rec­ol­lec­tion of.  The thing that gets me into trou­ble is, Potatohead doesn’t know that I/​we are married.

Sarah has come to bed late on sev­eral occa­sions, only to see me shoot upright in bed and demand “Who is that?”

It’s me,” she says.

Me WHO?” Potatohead asks.

Sarah,” she says, begin­ning to be a bit more exasperated.

Sarah WHO?”

And that’s the last straw.  “Your WIFE,” she snaps.  “Go back to sleep.”

Oh.  Okay,” says Potatohead and down he goes back to where he came.  And the only indi­ca­tor I have that this con­ver­sa­tion ever hap­pened is that my wife is pissed at me all morn­ing for no appar­ent reason.

How does one force his or her two minds to sit down and come to some kind of ami­ca­ble agree­ment?  We have crap that needs to get worked out if we are going to con­tinue to make a career of work­ing together.  This part­ner­ship is turn­ing sour, and I need to straighten things out quickly.  I also need to get it through Potatohead’s half-​​brain that ask­ing “Sarah WHO?” is not a good thing for either of us.  If any­one has any sug­ges­tions, I’d love to hear them.

The Madness and Genius of John Brown

Posted on:

I can still remem­ber the first time I ever saw an image of John Brown.

I’m ten years old, and we are tour­ing the Capitol build­ing in Topeka Kansas.  We have been learn­ing Kansas his­tory all year, all about Bloody Kansas and the found­ing of Topeka and the Nebraska-​​Kansas Act.  None of it means any­thing to me. The Capital build­ing smells funny and is full of weird old men who look like grand­fa­thers, wear­ing ugly brown suits.  It’s the mid-​​80s and polit­i­cal fash­ion in Kansas has not left the 1970s.   I want to climb the 296 steps to the top, to look out upon the city of my birth, but we are not allowed because they are reha­bil­i­tat­ing the old dome.  At that very moment, my father’s father is hang­ing from scaf­fold­ing some­where high above us and installing new windows.

Our tour enters the east wing, and there I see for the first time what is to become one of the most iconic paint­ings of my entire life, along­side works by Monet, Dali, and van Gough.  It depicts a giant of a man, with a long and flow­ing beard, mad­ness in his pierc­ing eyes, hold­ing a rifle in one hand and an open book, pre­sum­ably the bible in the other, stand­ing astride two fallen sol­diers.    Behind him Union and Confederacy forces clash.   On the Confederacy and the man’s left, flames fill the sky with dark clouds, and on his right, with the Union, a twister has come down from the sky like God’s own fin­ger.   I remem­ber nearly every detail of this paint­ing from that moment on.  But it is the eyes of John Brown, the man in the paint­ing, that never leave me.  Those mad, mad eyes.

They lec­ture us in school about John Brown, the abo­li­tion­ist.  His his­tory is framed as a fail­ure.  John Brown the abo­li­tion­ist set out to start an upris­ing among the slaves.  His clash here in Osawatomie where I write this is con­sid­ered by some to be the first bat­tle of the Civil War.    But he was tried and hung in Virginia before the war ever began, and in his spe­cific goals, he was indeed a failure.

I grew up think­ing of the man as an tragic com­i­cal fig­ure, a fool with a sad end.  A man who dreamed of doing some­thing amaz­ing and fail­ing at it.  A man who was mad as a hat­ter, because that is what my teach­ers said.  Madness was the thing I always asso­ci­ated with him.  He fright­ened me, with those eyes, and with his actions of the Pottawatomie Massacre.

But today, I vis­ited the John Brown Museum and I learned things that put John Brown in an entirely dif­fer­ent per­spec­tive for me.  He was many things, but I am not so sure he was a fool.

Most every­one famil­iar with Civil War his­tory is famil­iar with the inci­dent at Harper’s Ferry, in which John Brown unsuc­cess­fully  led an attack and failed to ini­ti­ate a slave revolt.  He was cap­tured and even­tu­ally hung by the state of Virginia.    The way the story of Harper’s Ferry was por­trayed to me in my school­ing at least was that it was a ter­ri­bly mis­guided attack, a fool­ish one, and that only an ego­ma­ni­a­cal mad­man would think such an attack could suc­ceed.  Another black eye was that the first casu­alty of the bat­tle was a freed black man (not among Brown’s men).    Brown’s life, like many of the men from the time, was full of a mix­ture of busi­ness suc­cess and fail­ures.  He tried many paths in mak­ing a career for him­self.  But when his sons were threat­ened by pro-​​slavery forces here in Osawatomie, he set out from back east to come and help pro­tect his fam­ily and help fight to make Kansas a free state.

At the time, “Border Ruffians” had gath­ered in the area, all pro-​​slavery men, mostly from Missouri, around Osawatomie.  They intended to attack and wipe out the abo­li­tion­ist set­tle­ment.   Brown and his fam­ily, act­ing in I guess what might be a pre­emp­tive retal­i­a­tion, attacked and mur­dered 5 men, hack­ing them to death with broadswords, not miles away from the place where I sit and type this entry.  This became known as the Pottawatomie Massacre, and it was used to vil­lify Brown in later years.  Certainly, it is hard to jus­tify these actions, but they must be under­stood in the con­text of the time.  Lawrence, my home town, was sacked by pro-​​slavery forces, and then burned to the ground dur­ing the Civil War by Quantrill and his men.  It was the com­mon belief among Kansans (and mostly true) that the pro-​​slavery forces would use vio­lence and any other means to ensure that Kansas became a slav­ery state (and I am happy to report that they failed).

Brown was not a great mil­i­tary leader, that much I know now.  His most suc­cess­ful bat­tle, here in Osawatomie, involved shoot­ing at raiders from the trees, out­num­bered 7 to 1, but his defense ulti­mately failed, he retreated, and Osawatomie was sacked and burned.    So his great­est suc­cess was a failure.

In America, we like a win­ner, and when it comes to mil­tiary action, Brown was not a win­ner.  But I learned today that as an intel­lec­tual, he was a man who was will­ing to take action when few oth­ers would.  John Brown not only believed and espoused the abo­li­tion­ist phi­los­o­phy.  He was deter­mined to take action.

Reading a famous bit of Brown’s writ­ing made me real­ize that he was no mad­man, but an ide­al­ist will­ing to take any action nec­es­sary to sup­port his ideals.  He was no blood thirsty killer either.  In this news­pa­per col­umn that was widely reprinted, he com­pares the pub­lic response to the round­ing up and sum­mary execution-​​style shoot­ing of then men from the Lawerence area for being Free State sup­port­ers to his free­ing of 11 slaves and the death of one slave owner.    Read  John Brown’s “Parallels” and tell me that those actions speak of an unhinged per­son.  The slan­der against his name and his cause existed even then, and have only con­tin­ued to this day.

It was a quote from Fredrick Douglass, a black leader from the time, that finally, irrev­o­ca­bly changed my opin­ion of the man who many claim started the Civil War:

Did John Brown fail? John Brown began the war that ended American slav­ery and made this a free Republic. His zeal in the cause of free­dom was infi­nitely supe­rior to mine. Mine was as the taper light; his was as the burn­ing sun. I could live for the slave; John Brown could die for him.”

Ordinarily we have the upmost respect in the U.S. for those will­ing to die for free­dom.  And yet some­how, I learned from the edu­ca­tional sys­tem that John Brown was a men­tally unbal­anced fool who failed at every­thing he did.  Because, I think, more than we like some­one who is com­mit­ted to pure ideals, we hate a loser.

John Brown was no fail­ure.  He did not live to see the impact of his actions take hold on the coun­try, but take hold they did.   Perhaps we can attribute his actions as the cause of the War, at least, one of many.  A hor­ri­ble war, but nec­es­sary, I believe, to begin the long and ongo­ing process of secur­ing the words and spirit of our Constitution and Bill of Rights.    John Brown saw that, and he gave his life for it.  He has noth­ing but my pro­found respect.

Now when I look at the pho­tographs and at the famous paint­ing by John Steuart Curry, and I look into those eyes, I do not see the mad­ness that was once sug­gested.  I look into those eyes and a see a fierce deter­mi­na­tion to truth and equal­ity.  It should only look like mad­ness to those who oppose such things.  It is a stare that should strike fear straight into the hearts of big­ots and racists every­where to this day.

Driving Kansas

Posted on:

Prepare your­self.  I am about to make a bold state­ment that will most likely cause many of you to ques­tion my sanity.

I like–no, even love– dri­ving across Kansas.

It’s a hard drive, eleven or so hours in length, depend­ing on traf­fic in places and how much I stop along the way for gas and food.   Weather at this time of the year can be a seri­ous haz­ard.  It began to snow in Fort Collins not long after I left yes­ter­day, and by this morn­ing, 8 inches had accu­mu­lated. The storms con­tin­ued march­ing from the west to the east and arrived here tonight in the form of dis­tant thun­der­storms to the north.  I’ve been sit­ting on the couch lis­ten­ing to the thun­der and watch­ing the light­ning light up the sid­ing of the house next door through the high win­dows in my par­ents 1920s Arts & Crafts Bungalow-​​style home.  Everything here is hard­wood, rich and brown, stone tiled fire­places, antique fur­ni­ture.   It’s a nice and wel­come change from twelve hours in the plas­tic and vinyl womb-​​like space of a mod­ern car.

But the drive itself is peace­ful if noth­ing else, but also full of his­tory and the kind of beauty only some­one who grew up on the plains can appre­ci­ate, per­haps.   I hit the free­way south to Denver at 8 AM and made good time around the metrop­o­lis and onto the Long Shot east.  The first hour of the drive is typ­i­cal Colorado dri­ving.  On my left, farm­lands and fields stretch­ing to the hori­zon.  On my right, the foothills give rise quickly to the Rocky Mountains, wreathed in heavy clouds that her­alded the snow.

Past Denver, the moun­tains recede into the rearview mir­ror as quickly as the traf­fic.   If I were to drop you on a ran­dom spot between Denver and the Kansas bor­der along I-​​70, you would not be able to tell whether you were in  Kansas or Colorado.  You’d prob­a­bly say Kansas.  I wouldn’t blame you.

Eastern Colorado is eas­ily my least favorite leg of the trip.  The towns and the farms are few and far between.  The range here is just empty and flat, the kind of flat every­one asso­ciates with Kansas even if they’ve never been there.  Nebraska-​​flat.  It always takes me longer to reach the Kansas bor­der than I expect.

Seeing the small “Welcome to Kansas” sign next to the weigh sta­tion at the bor­der never fails to make me smile.  It’s not osten­ta­tious  like the much larger and browner “Goodbye from Colorado” sign that her­alds it.  It’s small, just big enough for the words, and easy to miss (although I never miss it).  The sight never fails to relax some hid­den tensed mus­cles inside me, per­haps imag­ined mus­cles.   I almost feel like I have been hold­ing my breath since Denver, and can only take my first deep inhala­tion once I have passed Kanorado, Kansas.

The first third of the drive through Western Kansas is not so very dif­fer­ent than Eastern Colorado, as far as the grand vis­tas.  The dif­fer­ence I feel is purely psy­cho­log­i­cal.  Few trees, many fields, and towns announc­ing their pres­ence on the hori­zon with either the steeple of a church or a grain silo (or both).  At this time of the year, I see my first green fields near Goodland.  Winter wheat, I sus­pect, planted many months ear­lier, already turn­ing into a ver­dant car­pet over the slightly rolling landscape.

It is on this part of the road that you had have an audio­book or a music album that you can lose track of your­self within.  The dri­ving is not chal­leng­ing.  The land­scape is inter­est­ing only to the most Kansan of Kansans and the afi­cionado of grain silos and early 20th cen­tury church archi­tec­ture.   But as you progress east, things begin to get more inter­est­ing to the dis­cern­ing eye–such as mine, trained by the drive I’ve been mak­ing in some form since I was 7 years old.

Once you pass a series of farm com­mu­ni­ties, it’s open land until Hays, a small col­lege town in Postrock coun­try.  When this area was first set­tled, wood was in very short sup­ply, but yel­low lime­stone was free to quarry from any hill­side.  As you grow closer to Hays, Kansas, you begin to notice these weath­ered, warped, and worn stone posts, non­func­tional relics that define prop­erty lines but are backed up by the more tra­di­tional barbed wire fences.  It is here in this part of the state that the grass seems to grow more wild, and you begin to see the aban­doned farm­steads.   Every fifty miles or so, you can catch a close-​​up look at the rel­a­tively unchanged remains of a lime­stone farm­house, or a rot­ted and dilap­i­dated barn.   Old-​​fashioned wind­mills turn on the wind beneath the tow­er­ing alabaster blades of their power-​​generating descen­dants.    traf­fic on the road is light,  and the road is so straight that even alone, you can soak in the sight of desolation.

They told us sto­ries in grade school about the fron­tier­swomen who set­tled out here with their fam­i­lies and were dri­ven mad by the soli­tude and the wind.   From the aban­doned struc­tures,  I won­der if ulti­mately, the wind and soli­tude drove them all away.

The other object of inter­est to keep your eyes from slip­ping closed are the hand-​​painted signs.   Some help­fully remind you that “abor­tion stops a beat­ing heart” with a crude red heart painted next to the words.   Others adver­tise an upcom­ing road­side attrac­tion that includes the world’s largest prairie dog and a five-​​legged steer among var­i­ous other ani­mals, no doubt kept in tiny pens  and half-​​starved.  Billboards have been errected here and there adver­tis­ing the ser­vices and restau­rants of towns some­times as much as two hun­dred miles ahead. Somehow, prob­a­bly per­haps due to the lack of stim­u­lus, you still remem­ber those signs when the adver­tise­ments arrive in your path.

You pass through Hays quickly enough, per­haps catch­ing sight of the statue of a ptero­dactyl, or see­ing the 100,000 dome of the Sternberg Museum, one of the best col­lec­tions of kansas ocean fos­sils on the planet.  You see, the real­iza­tion that livens my drive every time as I cross the nearly bar­ren expanse is that all of this, from hori­zon to hori­zon, was once a giant inland ocean, and home to some of the dead­liest aquatic preda­tors that ever lived on earth–the mosasaurs.  One of the great ironies of Kansas is that so many of its res­i­dents flatly deny evo­lu­tion and beleive in a 2,000 year old Earth while, directly beneath their feet through­out most of the state, are 30 mil­lion year old ocean fos­sils that can only be explained in their belief sys­tem by accus­ing the stones of being planted by Satan him­self to make the hard-​​working folks ques­tion their faith.

Kansas here, in this mid­dle part, is one giant fos­sil to me.  I can­not help but pic­ture behe­moth forms sail­ing through the air above me, of mas­sive hub-​​cap-​​sized clams open­ing and clos­ing in invis­i­ble cur­rents along­side the road. I am dri­ving along the bot­tom of a ghostly ocean here.

Hays passes almost too quickly, and here is where the land­scape begins to grow more rough.  Once Salina is fad­ing behind you, small hills begin to rise from the land­scape.  Rivers weave between them, dressed in the fringes of trees only just now begin­ning to have a haze of green upon their branches.  If you were to swing south to Witchita, you would drive through a series of hills impres­sive to even a Colorado res­i­dent.  The Flint Hills were what I thought moun­tains looked like when I was younger. they’re not really that far off in some ways, up close.

I do not swing south, but con­tinue to the east.  The trees grow denser.  The hills rise and fall, form­ing ridges along­side the road.  I pass Fort Riley and its Army-​​green heli­copters with blades echo­ing the giant wind tur­bines from hun­dreds of miles back.  then Manhattan, the “lit­tle apple”  as adver­tised in bill­boards, and home of Kansas State University.  Purple-​​colored Wildcat ter­ri­tory.  And then, not so long after that, some­times more quickly than I expect, the urban blight of Topeka stretches out before me.  I say blight, because I know the city’s heart, and it is rot­ten to the core, a dirty, filthy place with few redeem­ing val­ues.  As I pass through, even from the inter­state I can see boarded up houses on the fringes of the emptied-​​out down­town.   It’s not so bad as decay­ing metrop­o­lises like Detroit, but it smells like death just the same.

Then the turn­pike, a toll-​​road to Kansas City, which I only take as far as Lawrence.  From there, I cut around the edges of town, past Clinton Lake (not named after the pres­i­dent), where I spent dozens of early Saturdays as a teen wish­ing with my father and my brother and sis­ter in my father’s boat.

Somewhere just out­side of Topeka, the mem­o­ries begin to take effect, and I see not only things as they are, but how they were when I was younger.  The growth and expan­sion shines brightly in my minds eye,  bright that hurts and makes me ache with an emo­tion I can only call nos­tal­gia.   Lawrence is where the mem­o­ries begin to crowd out the real­ity of things, and the way things were seem more sub­sta­nial than the way things are.

Lawrence whizzes by, the hill where Kansas University tow­ers above every­thing else in the area shrinks until it is no big­ger than you thumb, and I swing south on Highway 59.  Here, I think about my friend Niles and how I would take this road to his house nearly every week­end when I wasn’t work­ing in high school.  He was the first friend I ever had that could see through the bull­shit we tell our­selves and tell me what I really wanted or thought.  Such a skill is valu­able as a friend.  Last I had heard, he’d fled to Canada to escape jail in NYC.   I pass his home and wince to see that what was once a house on five acres is now crowded by a dozen more houses.  Even here your neigh­bors are closer than they were twenty years ago.

I’ve never taken this road before beyond Niles’ house, I real­ize, and soon I’m dri­ving a glacially slow 30 mph through Ottawa.  A county seat, it fea­tures an aston­ish­ingly beau­ti­ful cour­t­house from the Victorian period, dot­ted with stat­ues of lady Justice and spires and weird tower struc­tures.  I’ll try to take pic­tures when I pass back through again later.

Just past Ottawa, I turn east again, now on the mythically-​​named John brown Highway, push­ing towards the Missouri bor­der.  Here, I see even more aban­doned build­ings crum­bling and decay­ing.  I see old school houses with their bell tow­ers col­lapsed, burned out homes, and barns lean­ing so far that you would think a horse stomp­ing its foot would turn it into a pile of rub­ble.  I roll down the win­dow to smell the sharp tang of grass­fire as farm­ers clear away the growth on fal­low land to allow the green to come through with the rain.

I see all this in the golden light of a low sun behind me.  The land­scape now  has turned bril­liant green.  It reminds me of noth­ing so much as the English coun­try­side.  My mother first made this obser­va­tion on the road to Bath from London a few sum­mers ago while think­ing about how her father, a desert-​​raised boy from Arizona, sta­tioned in England in the mil­i­tary, had come to set­tle down and raise his fam­ily in Topeka.  Our Kansas is not so dif­fer­ent from that place in appear­ance, as strange as it sounds.

Soon, John Brown Highway deposits me in the slowly dying town of Osawatomie, sur­rounded by rivers prone to flood­ing, once a thriv­ing town home to the state men­tal hos­pi­tal.  Now, many of its store­fronts are closed or boarded up, and the homes up for auc­tion, or for the lucky ones, just for sale.  Osawatomie wears the state of the econ­omy on its face like a domino mask.  I have arrived.

A good sound­track makes it all go by faster, and good con­ver­sa­tion even faster.  I don’t like mak­ing the drive alone very often, and I dread it up until after the sec­ond or third hour, and then I remem­ber.  I’m going home.  These road­ways might as well be the veins in my arm, I know them so well.

It feels good to come back.  Most peo­ple could never under­stand why I would ever want to come here at all.  Its beauty is not loud.  It is under­stated, like that sign at the bor­der.  All along the way, it whis­pers “wel­come home,” in a voice as soft as the wind blow­ing through the corn. I can’t really blame you if you can’t hear it like we can.

The Latest Photo Shoot: After The End of the World

Posted on:

Tor​.com /​ Science fic­tion and fan­tasy /​ Blog posts /​ Tor​.com It’s the End of the World as We Know It Caption Contest.

Click on over to Tor if you’d like to see my lat­est sci­ence fic­tion pho­tog­ra­phy project–a postapoc­a­lyp­tic night­mare land­scape and a badass sur­vivor.  They’re giv­ing away a copy of the print along with some other awe­some swag as part of the cap­tion con­test.  Go enter!

Postmortem: What the hell was #futureJer?

Posted on:

My 3 month long exper­i­ment in 140 char­ac­ter fic­tion posts ended on Sunday.  You can read my ser­ial fic­tion #future­Jer on the Thaumatrope web­site here.  The premise was  pretty sim­ple: I attempted to imag­ine my life 2 years into the future if our econ­omy doesn’t get any bet­ter.  It’s fairly grim, but has a touch of hope to it too.  The cast were barely fic­tional ver­sions of my fam­ily and friends, and it takes place in rural Kansas.

The Genesis of a Twitter Serial

Back before I was actu­ally laid off, but knew the threat was loom­ing, I was expe­ri­enc­ing a lot of anx­i­ety.  On a whim, I decided to imag­ine how bad things could get to exter­nal­ize my fears, and I started twit­ter­ing this in the form of #future­Jer.  Within a cou­ple of days, Nathan Lilly, the edi­tor of Thaumatrope, direct mes­saged me and offered to pay me to do what I was already doing, at pro rates no less.  It was an easy deci­sion to make.

Postmortem

I never had any inten­tion of telling a story when I started out doing this, but once I was offered money, I had to give it an arc.  I intro­duced the ele­ments of the preg­nancy and the grow­ing vio­lence to develop the drama.  I was hap­pi­est about the project when I was sim­ply imag­in­ing our lives as essen­tially sub­sis­tence farmer/​hunters.  I find some­thing deeply com­pelling about a life with­out work, where you sim­ply grow your own food, main­tain your own home, and enjoy life.  I think we’re hard­wired more for the hunter/​gatherer or farmer life more than we are for work­ing in offices.

The tone prob­a­bly got even darker when I was actu­ally laid off at the end of January.  I sat down a few days later and wrote the entire month of February in an after­noon, plot­ting out the remain­der.  I sus­pect the final bit felt slightly more cohe­sive than the bits that led up to it.

Overall, it was an inter­est­ing exper­i­ment in writ­ing on the fly, and hope­fully I didn’t screw it up too much.  Also, I hope it doesn’t turn from fic­tion to real­ity, because I don’t actu­ally know how to build or repair wind tur­bines or cas­trate bulls, although I’m will­ing to learn if some­one wants to teach me!

Digital Photography Tips: David Pogue’s, and Lifehacker’s, and now mine

Posted on:

Lifehacker has a col­lec­tion of starter pho­tog­ra­phy tips today that you might find use­ful.  They use David Pogue’s tricks as a jump­ing off point.  I’m going to assume you go off and look at these and either find them use­ful or you find them too basic.  Now here are some pho­tog­ra­phy tips of my own to try and get you shoot­ing like a semi-​​pro.

Shoot in Aperture Priority Mode

Your cam­era prob­a­bly has a mil­lion modes that you may or may not have played with.  Some might be icons, and some are prob­a­bly just let­ters like “A”, “P” and the dreaded “M.”  Your cam­era may not have any of those set­tings.  If that’s the case, I sug­gest you find one that does.  They’re get­ting cheaper and cheaper.  So what is aper­ture pri­or­ity mode?  It’s prob­a­bly “A” on your mode dial, to start.

I’m not going to bore you with the sci­ence of lenses and light and irises.  Aperture mode is 50% of what you need to make your pho­tos look more pro­fes­sional.  You know how nice pro­fes­sional pic­tures iso­late the sub­ject, and how every­thing in the back­ground is blurry?  But you know how your snap­shots are tack sharp all the way through? The dif­fer­ence is basi­cally aper­ture.  Select aper­ture mode and dial it down as far as you can (aper­ture is mea­sured in some­thing called f-​​stops).  The lower the num­ber, the more blur you will have and the nar­rower your focal range is.  Really low set­tings and you could take a pic­ture of someone’s face where their eyes are in focus and their ears are not.   I am almost always shoot­ing at the small­est aper­ture set­ting on my cam­era.  Sometimes I dial it up if I want to increase the depth of field.

To get even more blur, zoom in.  Now I mean opti­cal zoom.  Turn off dig­i­tal zoom if your cam­era has it. It sucks.  Anyway, this decreases the depth of field even more.  So, you want to iso­late your sub­ject and get nice blur, zoom in, turn on aper­ture mode, and dial aper­ture to the small­est num­ber you can get.  Instant qual­ity boost.

Another good rea­son to shoot in aper­ture mode?  You need less light to expose a photo.  Less light means faster shut­ter speed which means there’s much less chance your pic­ture will turn out blurry because it’s impos­si­ble to truly hold a cam­era still.  The greater your focal range (the far­ther you can zoom in) the faster your shut­ter speed needs to be to avoid the dreaded cam­era shake.  For instance, I shoot with a 300mm lens often, and even with my camera’s image sta­bi­liza­tion, I try to shoot at no less than 1/​600th of a sec­ond, and even then, I get blurry shots sometimes.

Find your ISO set­ting and turn it up when indoors

Have you ever tried to take pic­tures in your house and found that the pic­tures turned out either under­ex­posed or blurry, or worst of all, you used the on-​​camera flash and every­one looks dazed?  We gen­er­ally light our homes pretty dimly as far as pho­tog­ra­phy goes.  There’s some num­bers I could throw at you that explain the aver­age light­ing as it relates to cam­eras, but who cares.  Here’s how you get bet­ter indoor pic­tures quickly, but at a sacrifice:

Your cam­era most likely has a set­ting for some­thing called ISO.  Remember how film had speeds?  Well, ISO on cam­era is about the same thing, only the rea­sons for it are dif­fer­ent.  The higher your ISO, the more sen­si­tive your camera’s sen­sor is to the light.  Try boost­ing to ISO 400 or even ISO 800 when shoot­ing in your house.

The down­side of boost­ing ISO is that you get noise.  Noise looks good in black and white.  It sucks in dig­i­tal pic­tures and often is “chroma” noise which means it’s all kinds of dif­fer­ent col­ors.  It’s up to you to decide how much noise you can stand in your pic­tures.  Try tak­ing some shots at dif­fer­ent ISOs and look at them to get a feel.  Figure out your hard limit and never go above it.  I never shoot about ISO 400 if I can avoid it.  My par­tic­u­lar cam­era does not han­dle low light con­di­tions very well.  But some­times, noise is much bet­ter than under­ex­posed.  And if you can afford the bazil­lion dol­lars for some spe­cial soft­ware, you can strip out a lot of that noise (although even those really expen­sive pro­grams have their limits).

Forget Everything I Just Said and Use a Tripod

Cheap tripods cost $30 or so.  Buy one if you want to take pic­tures indoors often and don’t want to have to shell out for a hot-​​shoe flash (you can snap off the on-​​camera flash for all that piece of crap is worth).  Put your cam­era on the tri­pod and let your shut­ter speed be what­ever it needs to be.  Now, if peo­ple are mov­ing, expect the back­ground to be in focus and them to be blurry.  This can be a neat effect some­times.  I like shoot­ing peo­ple danc­ing this way. But basi­cally, the goal is to get the cam­era sta­ble when in low light because you’re going to have longer shut­ter times which means the pic­ture is more prone to pick­ing up your palsy.  Not that you have any, but every cam­era thinks you do.

Don’t want to carry a tri­pod around?  There are other options, like the poor man’s tri­pod and goril­lapods that I can go into in the future.  You could just sit the cam­era down on a shelf or some­thing, that works too.  Just don’t hold it in your hands unless you can get that shut­ter speed up!

Read your manual

The only man­ual I ever read is my cam­era man­ual (yes, I am a typ­i­cal guy in that way).  Especially when you have a $1700 pro cam­era like mine, you have to read it just to fig­ure out where they’ve hid­den all the damned set­tings. But even if you have a cheap point and shoot, you should read your man­ual.  Learn what those weird sym­bols stand for, because each one of them has a time and a place. You may never need them, but if you don’t read the man­ual, you’ll never know, will you?

Sometimes you have to get off the inter­net and shoot

Nobody taught me how to take pic­tures except myself.  I had a class in junior high and I grew up around pho­tog­ra­phers int he fam­ily, but they never put a cam­era in my hand and explained how they worked, and if they did, it was with equip­ment so archaic that cave men could have fig­ured it out.

I learned just like you’re learn­ing now.  Reading stuff on the inter­net, read­ing my man­ual, and exper­i­ment­ing. Each time I learn a new tech­nique I do a bunch of shots around it until I burn it into my middle-​​term mem­ory.  Not every­thing I read about turns out to be some­thing I care much about, but some­times, I learn some­thing that takes my work up a notch.

I’ve made around $400 this year on pho­tog­ra­phy.  I prob­a­bly spent ten times that at least.  Maybe in the long run, it will pay for itself, as I get bet­ter.  But don’t worry about that.  Buy what you can afford.  If you want to get seri­ous, then you should be read­ing some­thing other than my post.  But if you just have a casual inter­est in pho­tog­ra­phy, these tips and the tips in the arti­cles linked above should help you get bet­ter pic­tures most of the time.

And hey, chances are you’ve been laid off recently so you prob­a­bly have a lot of spare time on your hands between all those job inter­views and appli­ca­tions, so more time to prac­tice! Once you have your cam­era, dig­i­tal pho­tog­ra­phy is basi­cally free.  Just don’t get any ideas about try­ing to make money off of pho­tog­ra­phy unless you really really like wed­dings and have the calm of a zen mas­ter when being berated by Bridezilla.

Anatomy of a Steampunk Photoshoot

Posted on:

This was my first seri­ous shoot with logis­tics involv­ing a model, cos­tum­ing, and a shoot loca­tion. To spend an hour and a half behind the cam­era, I spent prob­a­bly 4 hours doing the var­i­ous admin­is­tra­tive tasks to set up. Here’s an overview of the process we went through to get the pic­tures I wanted.

The Model

A cou­ple of weeks ago, I posted a gen­eral cast­ing call on a site that con­nects pho­tog­ra­phers, make-​​up artists, and mod­els called Model Mayhem. I received quite a few responses, but most of them were from mod­els in the Denver area, which pre­sented logis­ti­cal prob­lems. I offered $15 an hour as my rate. I received prob­a­bly a dozen or so inter­ested responses, and I con­tinue to receive responses over time. Michelle was the stand-​​out of the group, and also, was local, a huge plus.

The prob­lem with a site like Model Mayhem is that there tends to be a bit of homogeny in the look and age ranges of the mod­els. Many, if not most, of the mod­els are young women in their 20s. This is fine for some of my needs, but I also need older mod­els, and male mod­els.
Continue read­ing ›