Fighting over Taste

The always-​​interesting Amy Sunderberg seems deter­mined to start flame wars in her com­ments today by point­ing out pop­u­lar geek things she doesn’t like.  Go give her what for.  Defend your turf!

This got me think­ing about the whole “your favorite band sucks” phe­nom­e­non on the inter­net (a quip from Metafilter’s forums).  Which is that I find it much eas­ier to find out what peo­ple are up in arms about and actively dis­like than I am able to find out about what they really love.  In any dis­cus­sion, it seems like the neg­a­tive com­ments weigh more heav­ily, and are more inter­est­ing.  Is this because I’m a pes­simist by nature?  So I’m drawn to crit­i­cism more?  Or is it my time in col­lege where I was taught to be a ‘crit­i­cal thinker’ (which when improp­erly used can turn you into a crit­i­cal jerk)? Hell if I know, really.

If I have to be defined by my tastes, I would rather be asso­ci­ated with the things I love than the things I hate. 

So maybe we should just pre­tend that some­one is attack­ing the things you love, and write from that spir­ited defense per­spec­tive more often.  Pretend I just said your favorite book, movie, or band sucks.  Tell me why it doesn’t.  I dare you!

    Posted on:

    3 Responses

    1. Christie says:

      Erin Anderson has a sim­i­lar post today, in the con­text of genre fic­tion: http://​tinyurl​.com/​3​r​7​9​9r4

      I main­tain that art can­not objec­tively “suck,” we can only like or dis­like it.

      But then I’m not much of a fighter. :)

    2. Christie says:

      Oops, that wasn’t the right link at all! It’s this one.

      http://​the​scream​ing​guppy​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​1​1​/​0​5​/​t​o​-​g​e​n​r​e​-​p​o​o​p​e​r​s​.​h​tml

      Sorry! I caught that the same moment you did and had to go dig up the right one.

    Leave a Reply