In Search of My Optimism for the Future

Michael Brotherton and I had a bit of a con­ver­sa­tion on the phone the other day—I don’t remem­ber the exact sub­ject, but we talked a bit about opti­mism for the eco­nomic and cli­matic future.  I expressed the usual dour pes­simism (“Paolo Bacigalupi is too upbeat for you,” I seem to recall him say­ing.)  Mike has an inter­est­ing post up recently about this whole issue of opti­mism as it relates to writ­ing sci­ence fic­tion and dystopias in par­tic­u­lar.

Mike calls bull­shit on Paolo’s state­ment that teenagers pre­fer dystopias because they sense the lie in opti­mism and “…our chil­dren will inherit a world sig­nif­i­cantly depleted and dam­aged in com­par­i­son to the one our par­ents handed down to us. And they know it…”  He makes some state­ments which I don’t find entirely con­vinc­ing regard­ing his own life—just because your life has improved doesn’t mean every­one has, nec­es­sar­ily.  The lives of my fam­ily have declined con­sid­er­ably in the last decade due to the econ­omy in par­tic­u­lar, and I think there are a few peo­ple out there whose lives are start­ing to see seri­ous effects from global warm­ing.  I can under­stand why some look at the future and they feel like we’re on a roller coaster about to make the big drop.  But then there’s a fas­ci­nat­ing link to a video in his com­ments that paints a very opti­mistic pic­ture about the qual­ity of life glob­ally over time.   So maybe ulti­mately things are con­sis­tently get­ting bet­ter for peo­ple, when taken as a whole (even if it does seem to suck pretty badly to be in Africa).

Personally, I think dystopias are pop­u­lar with teens because they fit that world view that EVERYTHING SUCKS that seems to come with the brain chem­istry of puberty.  And today, with all the news about dire eco­nomic and envi­ron­men­tal pre­dic­tions, maybe they buy into it even more heav­ily.   But I think teens just have a nat­ural pes­simism that comes along with being squeezed out of child­hood and into adult­hood, pos­si­bly not very will­ingly.  I know becom­ing a teenager pissed me off any­way.  I spent 4 years angry or depressed all the time for no good reason.

But to the mat­ter of adult opti­mism for our real futures…

The rea­son I have a hard time being opti­mistic about the envi­ron­ment in par­tic­u­lar is that I’ve watched our planet lose habi­tat after habi­tat and species after species for 20 years.  The Amazon will likely be a fairy tale today’s con­ser­va­tion biol­o­gists tell their grand kids.   Habitat destruc­tion in search of resources so our species can grow and build and extend is some­thing I can’t be opti­mistic about.  There’s lit­tle evi­dence to me that this trend will reverse any time soon, if ever.  Until devel­op­ing nations climb up out of poverty entirely, they’re going to slash and burn their resources to do it.   The planet becomes poorer for it in terms of bio­di­ver­sity which is some­thing I can’t explain the value of in the same way I can explain the value of a bar­rel of oil or hard­wood lum­ber.    So I won’t go into it here.  Another post, perhaps. 

Ultimately, it all comes down to the finite­ness of resources in my mind. Constant growth as demanded by cap­i­tal­ism is a phys­i­cal impos­si­bil­ity, as far as I can tell.  The world will run out of any num­ber of resources. Shit, helium may run out any day now.  Any num­ber of pre­cious met­als are becom­ing dif­fi­cult to find, met­als cru­cial in the man­u­fac­tur­ing of high tech devices.  Why is now any less likely than some time in the dis­tant future for resource deple­tion?   We hear news about peak oil, how we may have even already passed peak oil and begun our decline. 

And if you’re a mem­ber of the mid­dle or lower mid­dle class in the United States?  You have lit­tle to be opti­mistic about eco­nom­i­cally.  I defy any­one to give me evi­dence that my gen­er­a­tion will enjoy the same level of com­fort and sta­bil­ity that our par­ents did (or grand­par­ents in the case of my young par­ents who are hit very hard by this econ­omy as well).  Employer sta­bil­ity, this notion that you would have one excel­lent job for 35 years and then retire com­fort­ably?  Not for us.   Look at unem­ploy­ment rates among gen Y as well.    There’s an entire gen­er­a­tion grow­ing up to reach for the American dream only to find it miss­ing.  Can you fault them for won­der­ing if it were ever really there?

And yet, times have never been bet­ter for the megarich!  I sup­pose for them, the future has never looked brighter.  You’ll excuse me if I don’t share their opti­mism.  I wasn’t born with a plat­inum spoon in my mouth.

Our entire polit­i­cal sys­tem seems rigged in favor of the wealthy and their cor­po­ra­tions.  Do you think I as a small busi­ness can get away with pay­ing no or min­i­mal taxes like many mega­cor­po­ra­tions?  Of course not.   Did the wealthy really need a tax cut that increased our deficit by some­thing like 25%?  Of course they didn’t;  but they got it any­way.    And it just makes the future for us lower in the eco­nomic strata look even bleaker.  Our wages go down or stag­nate in real terms, and their net wealth con­tin­ues to sky­rocket into the stratos­phere.   I loathe the Tea Party and what they stand for, but I know where those peo­ple are com­ing from.  They see a world that increas­ingly is leav­ing them behind.  For both good and bad reasons.

For a good chunk of the peo­ple I know back home, their only hope of not strug­gling their entire lives for just enough income to get by is to win the lot­tery.   Or go on a game show run by the mega-​​rich which taunts them with the pos­si­bil­ity of win­ning money and then records their anguish when they lose it, and then they sell that fuck­ing anguish to you and I on net­work televisions. 

Seriously, is there any­thing more fuck­ing evil on tele­vi­sion today than shows like “Money Drop”?

Hell, I used to believe in the power of sci­ence to make the world bet­ter.  And I’ve spent my entire life watch­ing peo­ple in power reduce the public’s opin­ion of sci­ence to the point where more peo­ple in the U.S. ques­tion evo­lu­tion than believe in it, which to me is basi­cally on par with dis­be­liev­ing grav­ity.  The wealthy have attacked the public’s faith in sci­ence because it would have cost them money for us to believe that the planet’s cli­mate is being changed by their indus­tries.  An entire polit­i­cal arm of this coun­try dis­trusts the notion of experts.  The only sci­ence they care about is that which allows them to wring more money from the world.

And don’t fuck­ing get me started on the trav­esty that is our health care sys­tem in the U.S..  We are ALL one seri­ous ill­ness away from com­plete finan­cial oblit­er­a­tion.  Anyone who doesn’t believe that is a deluded fool or wealthy enough that noth­ing I have said here applies to them anyway.

Where’s my opti­mism?  Where’s my abil­ity to write sci­ence fic­tion like “The Kansas Jayhawk vs. The Midwest Monster Squad?”  Where did I leave it?  And would it be delu­sional of me to even try and adopt it again?  That’s the thing, isn’t it? If you’re a pes­simist and your pes­simism doesn’t come true, you get to be happy along with the opti­mists.  But if you’re an opti­mist whose pre­dic­tions prove false, then there’s lit­tle to be happy about.  The pes­simist at least gets the grim sat­is­fac­tion of being right. Even if they’re no hap­pier about the out­come than the optimist. 

Now, by being a pes­simist, did they some­how help ensure that the opti­mistic vision would never come true? Possibly.  But as far as pre­serv­ing one’s own sense of ego, the pes­simistic belief sys­tem is a bet­ter bet.   At least I can rec­og­nize that in addi­tion to every­thing else.

I feel like Mulder on this sub­ject.  I want to believe that the world will only get bet­ter.  But some part of my intel­lect rebels at the notion.   Maybe when I’m not send­ing money back to Kansas to help my fam­ily out reg­u­larly, maybe then I will start to believe that things can improve.  But right now, I feel like we’ve begun an unprece­dented decline, and I’m not sure for my fam­ily this decline will reverse.   And maybe we were spoiled in the first place, and it shouldn’t mat­ter so much? People in Africa are starv­ing, right? 

Yes, most every­thing I say here is self-​​interested.  No need to point that out.  Life may be improv­ing leaps and bounds for the Chinese, but when it comes down to it, I don’t really care except in a very gen­eral sense. And if their life’s improve­ments have to come at the cost of our qual­ity of life, all that’s going to do is make folks even more angry and dis­il­lu­sioned with the future

I’m going to keep  look­ing for my opti­mism.  Things like that video give me a broader per­spec­tive and make me feel bet­ter about where we’ve come from.  It’s hard to see the bat­tle­field when you’re in the trenches.  Maybe we really are win­ning the war.  I’ll be as happy as any opti­mistic soul if it turns out to be the case.

Maybe even happier.

    Tags: , , ,

    Posted on:

    4 Responses

    1. Jeremiah,

      I’m not dis­count­ing what you say, but when I began my cor­po­rate career (early 80s) we were already being told by the pun­dits that “my gen­er­a­tion will not be as well off as the pre­vi­ous one”.

      I had one of those jobs that was sup­posed to last a life­time and end with a pen­sion and a gold watch. The com­pany I worked for was bro­ken up by the Feds. Shortly there­after, the pun­dits began talk­ing about work­ers hav­ing to take charge of their own careers and for­get about work­ing at the same place for the rest of your life.

      I read Silent Spring back in the late 60s and par­tic­i­pated in some local clean-​​ups when the ‘Crying Indian’ was a pop­u­lar PSA on broad­cast TV (which was the only kind there was) and, not to bela­bor the point, I read Gerard O’Neils arti­cles that demon­strated the (at that time) eco­nomic near impos­si­bil­ity of get­ting out into space in a sus­tain­able fashion.

      I guess what I’m say­ing is that the issues that are being talked about right now are now new ones. They’ve been fes­ter­ing and have been ignored for decades.

      Ultimately, the solu­tion to our problem(s) is address­ing what Alan Dean Foster called the ‘ele­phant in the room’ that’s being ignored — population.

      That issue is so tied up with emotion-​​laden traps that I don’t think it ever will be addressed.

      On that happy note: I per­son­ally enjoy dystopian, post-​​apocalyptic sto­ries for two pri­mary rea­sons: first — I’m only read­ing about them, not liv­ing it and sec­ond, they often makes me feel good because I can glimpse not only where we are head­ing, but how much bet­ter off I am right now.

      (Kinda) LOL.

    2. Aranea says:

      I agree with most of what you’ve said. I see gen­er­ally two prob­lems with the way things are right now. One Americans are used to get­ting more than aver­age world pop­u­la­tion and they exported and mit­i­gated this idea of get­ting more to oth­ers through media and pro­pa­ganda such as Hollywood. So now every­body demands more. That’s good for the big cor­po­ra­tions because when every­body wants more they make more money. The prob­lem is sup­ply is lim­ited. So there has to be wars both open and behind the doors to con­trol the resources and to cre­ate new markets.

      Two peo­ple are herded by media. Literally! And we know who con­trols the media. There comes your crit­i­cism about sci­ence. Scientific method teaches peo­ple to think and to ask ques­tions. When peo­ple start to think they ques­tion. When they ques­tion they make their own deci­sions. The prob­lem deci­sions made by these peo­ple are not always con­sis­tent with what cor­po­ra­tions and politi­cians want. So when peo­ple see sci­ence as an enemy (such as in the case of evo­lu­tion) or gen­er­ally don’t learn it much they are eas­ier to control.

    3. I think to a great extent this is an issue of per­sonal phi­los­o­phy, not not real­ism. Projecting cur­rent trends to the future isn’t totally unrea­son­able, but isn’t log­i­cal either given how that has failed over and over and over and over and over again.

      Are there real prob­lems to worry about? YES. So let’s worry about them and sup­port efforts to fix them.

      If we scream “Everything sucks” we fail. Maybe that will turn out to be true, but it hasn’t so far. We are bet­ter off than 10 years ago, 20 years ago, 100 years ago, 200 years ago, 1000 years ago…

      Anyone sure that the future is worse than the past has failed to make a con­vinc­ing, quan­ti­ta­tive argu­ment. I’ll admit prob­lem areas, but pes­simists fail to admit many more suc­cess areas.

      Personally, I think it’s very con­fus­ing about the future, as pop­u­la­tion changes bring dif­fer­ent pros and cons and we must watch. I am sure, how­ever, that the doom­say­ers don’t have an actual clue and work from a per­sonal per­spec­tive rather than a logic-​​oriented per­spec­tive. If we’re going to pre­tend to be sci­en­tific, let’s be seri­ous. More trends than not are pos­i­tive, and while I’m wor­ried about the neg­a­tive ones, it sure isn’t clear that they’re inevitable.

      Cheers,
      Mike

    4. JeremyT says:

      Thanks for the excel­lent com­ments, all. A lot to chew on here.

    Leave a Reply