Michael Brotherton and I had a bit of a conversation on the phone the other day—I don’t remember the exact subject, but we talked a bit about optimism for the economic and climatic future. I expressed the usual dour pessimism (“Paolo Bacigalupi is too upbeat for you,” I seem to recall him saying.) Mike has an interesting post up recently about this whole issue of optimism as it relates to writing science fiction and dystopias in particular.
Mike calls bullshit on Paolo’s statement that teenagers prefer dystopias because they sense the lie in optimism and “…our children will inherit a world significantly depleted and damaged in comparison to the one our parents handed down to us. And they know it…” He makes some statements which I don’t find entirely convincing regarding his own life—just because your life has improved doesn’t mean everyone has, necessarily. The lives of my family have declined considerably in the last decade due to the economy in particular, and I think there are a few people out there whose lives are starting to see serious effects from global warming. I can understand why some look at the future and they feel like we’re on a roller coaster about to make the big drop. But then there’s a fascinating link to a video in his comments that paints a very optimistic picture about the quality of life globally over time. So maybe ultimately things are consistently getting better for people, when taken as a whole (even if it does seem to suck pretty badly to be in Africa).
Personally, I think dystopias are popular with teens because they fit that world view that EVERYTHING SUCKS that seems to come with the brain chemistry of puberty. And today, with all the news about dire economic and environmental predictions, maybe they buy into it even more heavily. But I think teens just have a natural pessimism that comes along with being squeezed out of childhood and into adulthood, possibly not very willingly. I know becoming a teenager pissed me off anyway. I spent 4 years angry or depressed all the time for no good reason.
But to the matter of adult optimism for our real futures…
The reason I have a hard time being optimistic about the environment in particular is that I’ve watched our planet lose habitat after habitat and species after species for 20 years. The Amazon will likely be a fairy tale today’s conservation biologists tell their grand kids. Habitat destruction in search of resources so our species can grow and build and extend is something I can’t be optimistic about. There’s little evidence to me that this trend will reverse any time soon, if ever. Until developing nations climb up out of poverty entirely, they’re going to slash and burn their resources to do it. The planet becomes poorer for it in terms of biodiversity which is something I can’t explain the value of in the same way I can explain the value of a barrel of oil or hardwood lumber. So I won’t go into it here. Another post, perhaps.
Ultimately, it all comes down to the finiteness of resources in my mind. Constant growth as demanded by capitalism is a physical impossibility, as far as I can tell. The world will run out of any number of resources. Shit, helium may run out any day now. Any number of precious metals are becoming difficult to find, metals crucial in the manufacturing of high tech devices. Why is now any less likely than some time in the distant future for resource depletion? We hear news about peak oil, how we may have even already passed peak oil and begun our decline.
And if you’re a member of the middle or lower middle class in the United States? You have little to be optimistic about economically. I defy anyone to give me evidence that my generation will enjoy the same level of comfort and stability that our parents did (or grandparents in the case of my young parents who are hit very hard by this economy as well). Employer stability, this notion that you would have one excellent job for 35 years and then retire comfortably? Not for us. Look at unemployment rates among gen Y as well. There’s an entire generation growing up to reach for the American dream only to find it missing. Can you fault them for wondering if it were ever really there?
And yet, times have never been better for the megarich! I suppose for them, the future has never looked brighter. You’ll excuse me if I don’t share their optimism. I wasn’t born with a platinum spoon in my mouth.
Our entire political system seems rigged in favor of the wealthy and their corporations. Do you think I as a small business can get away with paying no or minimal taxes like many megacorporations? Of course not. Did the wealthy really need a tax cut that increased our deficit by something like 25%? Of course they didn’t; but they got it anyway. And it just makes the future for us lower in the economic strata look even bleaker. Our wages go down or stagnate in real terms, and their net wealth continues to skyrocket into the stratosphere. I loathe the Tea Party and what they stand for, but I know where those people are coming from. They see a world that increasingly is leaving them behind. For both good and bad reasons.
For a good chunk of the people I know back home, their only hope of not struggling their entire lives for just enough income to get by is to win the lottery. Or go on a game show run by the mega-rich which taunts them with the possibility of winning money and then records their anguish when they lose it, and then they sell that fucking anguish to you and I on network televisions.
Seriously, is there anything more fucking evil on television today than shows like “Money Drop”?
Hell, I used to believe in the power of science to make the world better. And I’ve spent my entire life watching people in power reduce the public’s opinion of science to the point where more people in the U.S. question evolution than believe in it, which to me is basically on par with disbelieving gravity. The wealthy have attacked the public’s faith in science because it would have cost them money for us to believe that the planet’s climate is being changed by their industries. An entire political arm of this country distrusts the notion of experts. The only science they care about is that which allows them to wring more money from the world.
And don’t fucking get me started on the travesty that is our health care system in the U.S.. We are ALL one serious illness away from complete financial obliteration. Anyone who doesn’t believe that is a deluded fool or wealthy enough that nothing I have said here applies to them anyway.
Where’s my optimism? Where’s my ability to write science fiction like “The Kansas Jayhawk vs. The Midwest Monster Squad?” Where did I leave it? And would it be delusional of me to even try and adopt it again? That’s the thing, isn’t it? If you’re a pessimist and your pessimism doesn’t come true, you get to be happy along with the optimists. But if you’re an optimist whose predictions prove false, then there’s little to be happy about. The pessimist at least gets the grim satisfaction of being right. Even if they’re no happier about the outcome than the optimist.
Now, by being a pessimist, did they somehow help ensure that the optimistic vision would never come true? Possibly. But as far as preserving one’s own sense of ego, the pessimistic belief system is a better bet. At least I can recognize that in addition to everything else.
I feel like Mulder on this subject. I want to believe that the world will only get better. But some part of my intellect rebels at the notion. Maybe when I’m not sending money back to Kansas to help my family out regularly, maybe then I will start to believe that things can improve. But right now, I feel like we’ve begun an unprecedented decline, and I’m not sure for my family this decline will reverse. And maybe we were spoiled in the first place, and it shouldn’t matter so much? People in Africa are starving, right?
Yes, most everything I say here is self-interested. No need to point that out. Life may be improving leaps and bounds for the Chinese, but when it comes down to it, I don’t really care except in a very general sense. And if their life’s improvements have to come at the cost of our quality of life, all that’s going to do is make folks even more angry and disillusioned with the future
I’m going to keep looking for my optimism. Things like that video give me a broader perspective and make me feel better about where we’ve come from. It’s hard to see the battlefield when you’re in the trenches. Maybe we really are winning the war. I’ll be as happy as any optimistic soul if it turns out to be the case.
Maybe even happier.
Tags: economy, futurism, optimism, Science fiction


















![bg15_320a[1]](http://www.jeremiahtolbert.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/bg15_320a1-210x300.jpg)
Jeremiah,
I’m not discounting what you say, but when I began my corporate career (early 80s) we were already being told by the pundits that “my generation will not be as well off as the previous one”.
I had one of those jobs that was supposed to last a lifetime and end with a pension and a gold watch. The company I worked for was broken up by the Feds. Shortly thereafter, the pundits began talking about workers having to take charge of their own careers and forget about working at the same place for the rest of your life.
I read Silent Spring back in the late 60s and participated in some local clean-ups when the ‘Crying Indian’ was a popular PSA on broadcast TV (which was the only kind there was) and, not to belabor the point, I read Gerard O’Neils articles that demonstrated the (at that time) economic near impossibility of getting out into space in a sustainable fashion.
I guess what I’m saying is that the issues that are being talked about right now are now new ones. They’ve been festering and have been ignored for decades.
Ultimately, the solution to our problem(s) is addressing what Alan Dean Foster called the ‘elephant in the room’ that’s being ignored — population.
That issue is so tied up with emotion-laden traps that I don’t think it ever will be addressed.
On that happy note: I personally enjoy dystopian, post-apocalyptic stories for two primary reasons: first — I’m only reading about them, not living it and second, they often makes me feel good because I can glimpse not only where we are heading, but how much better off I am right now.
(Kinda) LOL.
I agree with most of what you’ve said. I see generally two problems with the way things are right now. One Americans are used to getting more than average world population and they exported and mitigated this idea of getting more to others through media and propaganda such as Hollywood. So now everybody demands more. That’s good for the big corporations because when everybody wants more they make more money. The problem is supply is limited. So there has to be wars both open and behind the doors to control the resources and to create new markets.
Two people are herded by media. Literally! And we know who controls the media. There comes your criticism about science. Scientific method teaches people to think and to ask questions. When people start to think they question. When they question they make their own decisions. The problem decisions made by these people are not always consistent with what corporations and politicians want. So when people see science as an enemy (such as in the case of evolution) or generally don’t learn it much they are easier to control.
I think to a great extent this is an issue of personal philosophy, not not realism. Projecting current trends to the future isn’t totally unreasonable, but isn’t logical either given how that has failed over and over and over and over and over again.
Are there real problems to worry about? YES. So let’s worry about them and support efforts to fix them.
If we scream “Everything sucks” we fail. Maybe that will turn out to be true, but it hasn’t so far. We are better off than 10 years ago, 20 years ago, 100 years ago, 200 years ago, 1000 years ago…
Anyone sure that the future is worse than the past has failed to make a convincing, quantitative argument. I’ll admit problem areas, but pessimists fail to admit many more success areas.
Personally, I think it’s very confusing about the future, as population changes bring different pros and cons and we must watch. I am sure, however, that the doomsayers don’t have an actual clue and work from a personal perspective rather than a logic-oriented perspective. If we’re going to pretend to be scientific, let’s be serious. More trends than not are positive, and while I’m worried about the negative ones, it sure isn’t clear that they’re inevitable.
Cheers,
Mike
Thanks for the excellent comments, all. A lot to chew on here.