I’m working on outlining a novel to which this issue is central, so I found my friend Paul’s mini essay a very interesting read. I’m not ready to say anything about this issue, but you really should read Paul’s post:
Sure, there are people out there who believe everything should be free on the web… and sure, those people are pretty stupid (or extremely idealistic and ignorant of the most basic tenets of economics). However, the “shitstorm-generators” that Palmer refers to – the ones with any real influence at all, rather than the lip-flapping skriptkiddiez who requote them out of context on their warez blogs – do not believe (or at least do not publicly claim) that “everything should be free on the web”.
And then there’s this brilliant bit as well:
Digital media is a non-rival good; to take it for free is not theft but evasion of cost, and evasion of cost is a fundamental tenet of economic behaviour (with the possible exception of those with more money than sense); economic behaviour is not rational but emotional, and basing your response to a change in the underpinnings of an industry’s economy on the hope that you can stop human beings behaving in the ways they always have done is to doom yourself to failure. Successful businesses work out ways to monetise desire, but business models do not last forever; if they did, there wouldn’t be an internet (or cars, or electricity, or, or, or). QED.
(emphasis Paul’s).
So off you go then. More here tomorrow.
Tags: digital content, piracy


















![bg15_320a[1]](http://www.jeremiahtolbert.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/bg15_320a1-210x300.jpg)
New Post: On Ethics of Content Theft Online (read @futurismic) : http://www.jeremiahtolbert.com/2010/11/o…
@jeremiahtolbert Thanks for the repost, amigo. :)
@PaulGrahamRaven no problem. Your analysis is proving helpful to me as I plot and scheme for TAKEDOWN NOTICE
@jeremiahtolbert If I’m giving people brainfood, I’m doing my job right. :)