A response to “a radi­cial pessimist’s guide to the next 10 years”

The Globe and Mail recently ran an inter­est­ing arti­cle of pre­dic­tions by Douglas Coupland.  I both agree and dis­agree with what he has to say.  Here are my thoughts on a selected num­ber of his predictions.

1) It’s going to get worse

Well, okay.  If you’re call­ing your arti­cle a pessimist’s guide, then you pretty much have to lead off with some­thing like this, eh?   I’m not con­vinced there’s any evi­dence that this eco­nomic cycle is any more likely to go down­ward than it is to trend upward.  And I’m pretty pes­simistic.  It’s a broad state­ment, and thus dif­fi­cult to really react to pos­i­tively or negatively.

2) The future isn’t going to feel futuristic

The future never feels futur­is­tic because it’s the present when you’re expe­ri­enc­ing it.  It takes dis­con­nect­ing your­self from the daily grind and con­ciously think­ing about the dif­fer­ence between today and yes­ter­day to really evoke the sense of futur­is­tic.  If you mean it’s not a Gernsback future, well, we all fig­ured that out some time around 1999.  Your fly­ing car is never going to hap­pen. Time to accept that.

6) The mid­dle class is over. It’s not com­ing back

This, I agree with, as things stand now.  The mid­dle class as we knew it was built on an indus­trial econ­omy, one where sta­bil­ity was derived from repet­i­tive, lightly skilled jobs pro­duc­ing prod­ucts with a con­stant or ris­ing demand.  It’s a pre-​​globalist phe­nom­e­non, and as far as I can tell, one of the pri­mary effects of glob­al­ism has been a return to global poverty.  It seems through most of his­tory, wealth has been con­sol­i­dated in the hands of the few.  Sometimes it seems like the mid­dle class was just a blip that came along with the ride of var­i­ous forms of democ­racy, and as democ­racy begins to fal­ter as a result of trans­form­ing into de facto oli­garchies, we’ll head back to the pre-​​Enlightenment sys­tems of peas­ants, peons, an wealthy aris­to­crats.  As soon as money==speech, the mid­dle class was doomed. 

Of course, none of that means we have to like it.  When the for­mer mid­dle class finally catches on, things are going to get bloody, and I wouldn’t ven­ture a guess.  The Tea Party move­ment at that point will look like the voice of rea­son.  Might be a cou­ple of gen­er­a­tions of declin­ing stan­dards of liv­ing before they’re finally shocked out of complacency.

Or one win­ter of food shortages—that would do the trick.

9) The sub­urbs are doomed, espe­cially those E.T. , California-​​style suburbs

They’re not doomed.  They’ll just adapt and trans­form.  I expect that all those idi­otic rules against sub­ur­ban farm­ing will get struck down out of neces­sity.  The sub­urbs are the future small towns and rural areas.  You may end up with whole­sale aban­don­ment in some places, but I have a feel­ing that they’re going to trans­form them­selves into vil­lages, not become pseudo-​​ghost towns.

17) You may well burn out on the effort of being an individual

I agree that we’re headed back to com­mu­ni­ties that are more inter­con­nected.  But my gen­er­a­tion isn’t going to burn out on indi­vid­u­al­ity.  For much of us, “being our indi­vid­ual selves” is a fun­da­men­tal cor­ner­stone of our self-​​identity.  maybe we’ll raise our kids to be more community-​​minded though.  But in 10 years? Not remotely likely to me.

20) North America can eas­ily frag­ment quickly as did the Eastern Bloc in 1989

I go back and forth on this notion.  I think it will very much depend, at least in the United States, on the exec­u­tive branch at the time.  We’ve kinda been through this already, and we fought the most bloody war in our nation’s his­tory to keep frag­men­ta­tion from hap­pen­ing.    I’m going to have to say “no way” on this hap­pen­ing in 10 years in the U.S.  In Mexico, though, that’s another story.

22) Your sense of time will con­tinue to shred. Years will feel like hours

I’m just mak­ing a wild guess here, but is Douglas Copland going through a midlife crisis?

28) It will become harder to view your life as “a story”

Narrative struc­ture didn’t invent itself, you know.  We’ve been struc­tur­ing our expe­ri­ences as story since we could paint on cave walls, or even before.  The idea that our life will instead be how­ever many friends we have online, I just don’t buy it.  It sounds like some­thing Facebook would pitch to ven­ture cap­i­tal­ists, not a real futur­ist pre­dic­tion.  Yes, your social net­work will be impor­tant.  But we’ll define our sense of self by it?  Is there going to be a fun­da­men­tal alter­ation of our brain chem­istry at the same time?

32) Musical appre­ci­a­tion will shed all age barriers

This may be the most inter­est­ing pre­dic­tion I’ve read.  I think it says some­thing about the gen­er­a­tion of new modes of music—what is the next rock n’ roll?  Is it rap?  Okay, then what’s com­ing after that?  The death of a musi­cal main­stream cul­ture caused by a frag­men­ta­tion of taste means gen­er­a­tions to come will have a harder time self-​​identifying with a spe­cific genre.  They’ll like bands com­posed of indi­vid­u­als their own age, but as far as age being linked to types of music?  I can buy this totally.

34) You’re going to miss the 1990s more than you ever thought

I don’t know, I already miss them pretty badly.  Then again, I was in high school and col­lege, and who doesn’t miss those years of their lives to some extent? A time of less respon­si­bil­ity always looks good from real adulthood.

37) People will stop car­ing how they appear to others

The num­ber of tribal cat­e­gories one can belong to will become infi­nite. To use a high-​​school anal­ogy, 40 years ago you had jocks and nerds. Nowadays, there are Goths, emos, punks, metal-​​heads, geeks and so forth.

Two social group/​tribes 40 years ago?  It’s not quite 40 years ago, but let me quote to you from Ferris Bueller’s Day Off:

Oh, he’s very pop­u­lar Ed. The sportos, the motor­heads, geeks, sluts, bloods, wastoids, dwee­bies, dick­heads — they all adore him. They think he’s a right­eous dude.

Are you telling me in 1970, there weren’t hip­pies or greasers?  Stoners or preps?

The num­ber of tribal cat­e­gories have always neigh-​​infinite.  It seems that we just care more now than we used to. With other forms of iden­tity, we put more weight on this one.

41) The future of pol­i­tics is the care­ful and effec­tive implant­ing into the minds of vot­ers images that can never be removed

Yeah, we all saw Inception  this sum­mer too.

45) We will accept the obvi­ous truth that we brought this upon ourselves

I thought this was sup­posed to be a pessimist’s guide?  That’s the most opti­mistic pre­dic­tion about a fun­da­men­tal change in human nature I’ve read yet!

So what do you think?  Do you agree or dis­agree with any of his 45 predictions? 

    Tags: , , ,

    Posted on:

    9 Responses

    1. amber says:

      I can’t agree with the future not feel­ing like the future. Or not feel­ing futur­is­tic, or even TODAY not feel­ing futur­is­tic. Any day I can tether my phone to my com­puter to get inter­net if stream­ing tele­vi­sion through my game con­sole slows down my inter­net too much FEELS like the future. Because back in the day I was play­ing jump­man on my com­modore 64 and lemon­ade was totally text-​​based and I actu­ally have very vivid moments where I stop and go “THIS FEELS LIKE THE FUTURE”.

      It hap­pens when I go to see big bud­get spe­cial effects movies with my 70+yr old dad and he com­ments on how when he was small movies had news reels in front and he gets SO EXCITED and doesn’t take the whiz bang for granted. In fact, that’s the rea­son he goes to the movies because he thinks it’s so awesome.

      and frankly, any­time I can sched­ule my pvr to record TV from my phone while I’m at the office?

      dude that’s the future.

      also we watch way too much television. :)

      • Jeremiah Tolbert says:

        Excellent points. I def­i­nitely have that same feel­ing form time to time. I used to run a series on this blog called “We Live in the Future” high­light­ing that sort of thing.

        The story about your Dad is great :)

    2. Roy Huggins says:

      I thought the exact same things when I read it, Germ. Loved your quip about midlife crisis. ;)

      And ya, I really do feel like the present feels like “the future” in that we def­i­nitely have those things we thought about when we played Shadowrun and watched sci-​​fi movies. But it still feels like the present for exactly the rea­son you said, dude: it /​is/​ the present. :)

      • Jeremiah Tolbert says:

        I knew there was a rea­son we were friends :)

        I think the whole thing was a bit of a puff piece, but what the hay. Writers gotta earn a liv­ing. I won’t begrudge him that.

    3. I com­pletely agree with you on music, in fact this was hap­pen­ing as soon as Gen-​​Y came around. Not that the notion nec­es­sar­ily started there — but Gen-​​Y is very much a reflec­tive gen­er­a­tion (as opposed to a nar­cis­sis­tic one as the media claims). As such, we started look­ing at what music used to look like and started to iden­tify with it and even pro­mote it on our Facebook pages when we thought highly enough about it.

      This sort of back-​​and-​​forth shar­ing used to only occur in art and poetry, espe­cially since music start­ing around the ‘60s was a very divi­sive and gen­er­a­tional interest.

      I think the only hin­drance to music appre­ci­a­tion will be the record labels who either adapt to or reject the flow of infor­ma­tion. Legitimately licens­ing and mon­e­tiz­ing dis­tri­b­u­tion in a dig­i­tal way will require a lot of open-​​mindedness, and they’re not exactly keen on that.

      In terms of frag­men­ta­tion, I’ve long believed in an esca­lat­ing sense of rad­i­cal­ism that will even­tu­ally lead to a sec­ond American Civil War. It’s appar­ent in almost every­thing — and only harsh blows to our sense of real­ity, com­mu­nity, and the con­cept of an indi­vid­ual liv­ing out the American Dream (ie — 9/​11, Columbine, etc) will re-​​center us enough to slow the pro­gres­sion of that rad­i­cal­ism. Those events should never be wished for, how­ever — if any­thing has the power to bring some objec­tivism to a sys­tem, it’s a crash.

      In terms of eco­nomic dis­par­ity, I’ve always thought that the mid­dle class was going to give way to highly tal­ented pro­fes­sion­als and highly tal­ented politi­cians. When more and more, the politi­cians do less work and the pro­fes­sion­als do more, that sense of rad­i­cal­ism increases and the ral­ly­ing cry won’t be, “Where are our jobs” but “Why aren’t they work­ing as hard for their money as we do?” And it will take some minor or sen­sa­tional dis­play of that dis­par­ity (like Denny Crane shoot­ing a home­less per­son with a paint­ball gun) to spark the insurrection.

      I def­i­nitely don’t think the future is as bleak as he paints it. We’re mak­ing great head­way in terms of infor­ma­tion dis­tri­b­u­tion, community-​​centric behav­ior, and char­i­ta­ble cause inte­gra­tion to com­mer­cial enti­ties (ie: the pink prod­ucts NFL play­ers are wear­ing to raise money for breast can­cer awareness).

      Anyway, thanks for the TWO inter­est­ing reads today!

    4. Michael says:

      I like this, JT, but it just isn’t true that glob­al­ism is lead­ing to “a return to global poverty”:

      global poverty rates over time (poverty usu­ally being defined as no more than $2 a day)

      My life isn’t get­ting bet­ter as fast as my par­ents’ lives were get­ting bet­ter when they were my age. But if I had to choose to be born as a ran­dom human either today or in 1950, I’d cer­tainly choose now.

      • Jeremiah Tolbert says:

        Fair enough. I sup­pose was just look­ing at it from a 1st world per­spec­tive which wasn’t very fair of me. Globalism is pretty much directly respon­si­ble for the death of high pay­ing man­u­fac­tur­ing jobs in the United States, wouldn’t you say? The work Detroit did has been moved over­seas due to lower labor costs. I spend a lot of time think­ing about Detroit and won­der­ing if all our cities are going to look like that in 10 years.

        • Michael says:

          Yeah, I agree with that.

          I think the only long-​​term solu­tion would be to make the US (cities and coun­try alike) so much fun to live in that the smart/​ambitious/​rich peo­ple of the world are will­ing to pack up and move here.

      • Michael says:

        The aside about food short­ages also gets my goat a bit. Absent some sort of price con­trol sys­tem, we wouldn’t see a food “short­age” as such — we’d just see the price of deli­cious meat go out of the price range for most fam­i­lies. It’s not as if beans and rice are going to be unavail­able to Americans in the forsee­able future.

        A world in which Americans have to eat more bur­ri­tos is a sad­der world, but not a des­ti­tute one.

    Leave a Reply