Don’t Damage Your Brand as a Marketing Twhore

Twitter is fast becom­ing a pim­ple on the back­side of my social net­work­ing life. It’s always been an odd thing, under attack by spam­mers of the tra­di­tional sort as well as non­tra­di­tional. I block social media experts, SEO experts, and porn stars on a daily basis. They don’t care what I have to say, they just want to sell me stuff. Twitter’s a great way to share things, but straight-​​up prod­uct pitch­ing has been really get­ting on my nerves.

But in the past month, I’ve noticed an even more unset­tling trend on Twitter. I am not going to be polite about how I describe this. I’m call­ing this twhor­ing. A lot of other activ­ity on twit­ter has been assigned this term, but this is a bet­ter sub­ject for that descriptor.

What is Twhoring and Twimping?

Twhoring is hap­pily advertising/​spamming prod­uct names as hash tags to your entire fol­low­ers list for the off-​​chance that you might win some piece of tech. Twhoring ranks lower than actu­ally adver­tis­ing or pros­ti­tu­tion because adver­tis­ers and pros­ti­tutes actu­ally get paid for what they do. Twhores tweet away with a slim chance of get­ting any­thing for their pub­lic­ity efforts.

The same sort of peo­ple who will com­plain about ads on a web­site or on a TV show seem to lose their senses when pre­sented with an easy oppor­tu­nity to “win” a Apple prod­uct. You might think you’re clever and start tag­ging the hash­tag to every one of your tweets. This is what the twimps like Boxyspace and Moonballz want you to do. Strut their stuff, spread their brand­ing far and wide. Maybe if you’re lucky they’ll give you a snack cake. A Twinkie perhaps?

It doesn’t help that I loathe both com­pa­nies involved in twimp­ing out their prod­ucts with twhores. “Build your own web­site” com­pa­nies gen­er­ally offer shoddy prod­ucts and com­pete with pro­fes­sional designer/​developers such as myself. No drag and drop sys­tem is going to build you a bet­ter web­site than some­one who has done it for years. And if it does, then you’re prob­a­bly a designer your­self and you didn’t need their soft­ware any­way. But that’s beside the point.

You may think that tag­ging your posts once and a while doesn’t do any harm, but when every­one on Twitter is doing it, it becomes old real quick. There for a while this week, I’d say 30% of the tweets I saw had MoonBallz attached to it. It’s like a twitterly-​​transmitted dis­ease. It spreads rapidly, and it makes you ooze mar­ket­ing pus.

Disinfect your­self, my friends. Stop being a twhore and start hold­ing out for some­thing of real value, at the very least. This isn’t a con­test you’re par­tic­i­pat­ing in, it’s a unnat­ural viral mar­ket­ing cam­paign that makes the par­tic­i­pants look gullible.

Too many peo­ple I respect have fallen prey to this. You are giv­ing it away, folks. Value your brand. It’s worth more than a laptop.

    Tags: , , , ,

    Posted on:

    13 Responses

    1. KenMcConnell says:

      I have to agree with you on this one Jeremy. But then I also have issues with peo­ple going over the top with Follow Friday too. When all you are Tweeting is a pile of @‘s, you are not pro­vid­ing real value to me. But if you do a @follow in an hon­est man­ner, I will be far more likely to check that per­son out.

    2. Jeremiah Tolbert says:

      Ken, I def­i­nitely agree with you on the Follow Fridays. One at a time, with a rea­son why we should fol­low works much bet­ter for me.

    3. John Anealio says:

      Agreed. I fol­low a decent num­ber of folks on Twitter. When I start to see all of the hash tags and @ signs, I start to just skim their tweets rather than read them. I’m prob­a­bly miss­ing some of the valu­able things that they have to say because they watered their mes­sage down because they wanted to win an iPhone.

    4. tychoish says:

      +1

      in the early days twit­ter was amaz­ing because there was the poten­tial for many-​​to-​​many con­ver­sa­tions and it was strange, and weird, and now.…

      signal-​​to-​​nosie has gone up, we’re com­fort­able with the ver­nac­u­lar. It’s time for some­thing that lets us niche-​​up and have more mean­ing­ful con­ver­saions again.

      wel­come to the inter­net, I guess

    5. Rob Darnell says:

      You’re seri­ous that peo­ple you “respect” are Twitter whores?

    6. Jeremiah Tolbert says:

      I’m not going to lose respect for pro­fes­sion­als in my indus­try just because they’ve lost their head over a lap­top. It’s silly and annoy­ing, but they’re good people.

    7. Rob Darnell says:

      I’m just sur­prised that any­one con­sid­er­ably intel­li­gent would fall for that crap.

    8. Jeremiah Tolbert says:

      Well, it seems to me that plenty of intel­li­gent peo­ple act in a less than intel­li­gent fash­ion when it comes to the acqui­si­tion of mate­r­ial goods.

      Aka, greed makes us all stupid.

    9. Rob Darnell says:

      I sup­pose.

      And I guess I’m being a jerk today. Sorry about that.

    10. Jeremiah Tolbert says:

      Hey, I’m the one who just called half his fol­low list “twhores.” No wor­ries, man.

    11. Kristan says:

      I’m a twhore, because I’m poor.

      I rhyme for free too. :)

    Leave a Reply