Hulu has the pilot up for a new television show, Glee, that I noticed some buzz about on Twitter. This past week, Sarah and I gave it a watch and really enjoyed it. Despite the fact that I’m not that interested in musicals usually, the show managed to grab me with its really unusual cast of characters.
Nearly every character has something weird and unlikable about them. No everymen or women in this show. Our teacher who restarts the Glee Club, ostensibly our main protagonist, is in a terrible marriage, longs for the days when he was in Glee Club in high school, and in order to convince a teen to join the club, plants drugs in his locker and pretends to bust him, offering him a choice of detention or Glee Club. All of the teachers are similarly flawed, but with likable traits as well.
Some of the student cast are fairly two dimensional, but the two teen lead characters are very mixed as well. The girl is literally insane, but sympathetic for being picked on so badly by her classmates (despite having accused the former Glee Club teacher of being gay because he didn’t give her the part she wanted). The boy is a jock who participates in torturing the teens lower on the social hierarchy of high school, including the other kids in the Glee Club.
As I watched the show, completely riveted, I asked myself what was it about the show that had my attention, and I decided it had to be these willingness to make its lead character complete assholes. Most sitcoms would never dare to make characters so borderline unlikable. The last TV show I can remember doing this well was Arrested Development. What is it about Fox that they’re willing to do this? Say what you will about these guys, but they generally are willing to take risks on shows that none of the other networks will?
I think it’s possible that simply unlikable characters would not be enough to get my attention. It’s that combination of sitcom with unlikable characters that seems to work here. The show plays with your expectations about sitcom characters, and while it’s obviously not the first to do so, I thought it was interesting, and that I would share it with you all.
What do you think about this technique? It seems like it would be much harder to pull off in a short story, where the pressure to have a sympathetic protagonist right away is fairly high. Do you know of any stories or novels that suceeded with this tactic for you? Mentioning your own stories if they’re published is cool too. I’d like to study the idea more.
I’ll be talking quite a bit about writing for the screen this week. Up later (no pun intended) will be some lessons about writing that I’ve gleaned from watching Pixar films, including the latest, er, Up. I consider Pixar to be some of the best storytellers working in any medium, and I think they have a lot to teach us about telling broadly accessible stories. If you’re wondering if you should go see Up, and you liked earlier films, don’t even hesitate. See the next show you can make time for. It’s that good.
Tags: characterization, Glee, My Writing, plot, TV


















![bg15_320a[1]](http://www.jeremiahtolbert.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/bg15_320a1-210x300.jpg)
Maybe it works because the fact that the show is meant to be a comedy allows the audience to view the quirks/antics of the characters as humorous rather than irritating? Actually, don’t many sitcoms have a jerk and/or schemer character for comic relief? Barney in “How I Met Your Mother” etc.
I think it’s harder to do in prose–at least for a main character/s–because to some extent the reader gets to “live in” the head of the main characters. I found Borat hilarious, but in no way would I want to read a story with him as a POV character.
Can’t really think of a jerk+comedy story offhand. Closest I can think of is Bullet in the Brain by Tobias Wolff. (http://www.newyorker.com/online/2008/02/11/080211on_audio_boyle).