5 Books on Writing and Science Fiction That Made Me a Better Writer

In the spirit of other posts this week, I thought I would share with you five books that I keep handy still when I’m try­ing to write fic­tion. Some of these books have imparted their lessons already, and some still have a lot to teach me. Each one of them has been use­ful for dif­fer­ent rea­sons, but I rec­om­mend all of them if you’re seri­ous about fic­tion. Some of them I rec­om­mend even to estab­lished writ­ers. Read on for the details.

Creating Short Fiction by Damon Knight

Strong sto­ries are made from things inside you want­ing to get out.

This was one of the very first books on writ­ing sci­ence fic­tion that was rec­om­mended to me. Damon Knight and his wife founded the Clarion Workshop. If any­one knows about cri­tiquing writ­ers sto­ries and teach­ing peo­ple to write, it’s this man.

I love the tone of this book. It’s encour­ag­ing while being real­is­tic. It’s writ­ten in a very relaxed style. One notion from this book that I found par­tic­u­larly valu­able was the con­cept of “Fred.” Fred is where Damon Knight’s ideas come from. What he means is the sub­con­cious. I’ve found that writ­ing for me is very much about the strug­gle and coop­er­a­tion between my con­cious and sub­con­cious minds. Damon puts it in sim­ple terms that made it clear to me that the lit­tle back-​​of-​​the-​​mind feel­ings were impor­tant to the process, and how impor­tant it is to lis­ten to Fred, to feed Fred, and gen­er­ally keep him entertained.

I’ve had prob­lems with my Fred lately, and I think that’s because I let my Fred become pre­oc­cu­pied with other mat­ters. But I’m work­ing on get­ting him fed up again, and lis­ten­ing to his whispers.

Another area that really helped me was the sec­tion on struc­ture. Damon explains some dia­gram­ming tech­niques that can be very help­ful. But there’s some­thing great on nearly every page, and I found it incred­i­bly help­ful early on.

Science Fiction: 101 edited by Robert Silverberg

Mastery of craft is a mat­ter of process, not of a sin­gle blind­ing moment of attain­ment: you go on work­ing toward it all your life.

I am not one to advo­cate that new writ­ers have to read the clas­sics of the genre before they get started. Frankly, I find a lot of the so called “Golden Age” to be bor­ing and very out­dated. However, There is some­thing to be said for read­ing the great sto­ries of the past, and this book does a pretty good job of find­ing gen­er­ally good sto­ries, but also sto­ries that teach a par­tic­u­lar les­son. Through it all you also get to learn about Robert Silverberg’s early career. It doesn’t work like that any­more, but it’s still inter­est­ing if you like sci­ence fiction.

The book’s an anthol­ogy, a how-​​to, and a mem­oir rolled into one tome. And if you think the rejec­tion let­ters you get today are bad, wait until you read the notes that Horace Gold sent Silverberg. Silverberg’s dis­sec­tion of the sto­ries con­tained within are quite fan­tas­tic to me, and that he was able to find a tech­ni­cal flaw in Bester’s “Fondly Fahrenheit” is damned impres­sive. It’s a minor one, but he uses it to illus­trate an impor­tant notion about para­graphs being con­nected to one another.

The Science of Science-​​Fiction Writing by James Gunn

Honore de Balzac dis­cov­ered that a char­ac­ter did not exist in fic­tion until that char­ac­ter had inter­acted with another char­ac­ter, and Gustave Flaubert dis­cov­ered that noth­ing exists in fic­tion until it has been located in time and place with an appeal to at least three senses.

I spoke about James Gunn as a teacher ear­lier this week. He’s not nearly as faux-​​discouraging in this text, and it’s quite nice. There’s a bit of an old-​​fashioned feel to this book, and I even dis­agree with some of the things that Gunn says, such as the notion that main­stream fic­tion dis­counts Darwin entirely. I think this may have been true in the past, but maybe not so much these days. A lot of the notions of SF have been coopted by the main­stream since he wrote the book, I think.

This is a good middle-​​level text, I think. He approaches con­cepts like char­ac­ter and plot in a very sen­si­cal way, and some of the his­tory of sci­ence fic­tion is very inter­est­ing from an enthusiast’s stand­point, even if it won’t tell you how to write a bet­ter story.


Writing the Breakout Novel
by Donald Maas

A great fic­tional world is a sum of details that to most read­ers are unknown.

This is an odd one for me to include because I haven’t fin­ished the book yet, but Even half-​​way through, and it’s already had an impact on the way I am think­ing about my novel projects. I don’t feel that this book will help that much if you’re just start­ing out, because it paints a fairly broad brush. I think Maas assumes a cer­tain level of expe­ri­ence here, even talk­ing about his book in terms of estab­lished nov­el­ists look­ing to take their work up to the next level.

It’s really his dis­cus­sion of rais­ing the stakes that has sunk its teeth into me. He even says that if there’s one thing that will make a story more pow­er­ful, it’s to raise the stakes. Now in sci­ence fic­tion, I think it’s eas­ier to take this too far. You can put the entire planet or uni­verse at stake in the right sit­u­a­tions, and it’s hard t dra­ma­tize those very well in my expe­ri­ence. But through the sim­ple act of con­tem­plat­ing the stakes, I’ve pushed sev­eral recent bits of writ­ing into a much more inter­est­ing place. I’ll report back on more of this one when I’ve man­aged to fin­ish it.

Story by Robert McKee

In life, expe­ri­ences become mean­ing­ful with reflec­tion in time. In art, they are mean­ing­ful now, at the instant they hap­pen.

For under­stand­ing sto­rycraft, and the struc­ture of sto­ries and plot, there’s no bet­ter book than this. I return to this book time and tmie again. It is so rich with under­stand­ing of the nature of story that my mind can­not con­tain its full impli­ca­tions in a sin­gle read. I pick this up from time to time and flip to ran­dom pages, always learn­ing some new les­son. Robert McKee uses a lot of screen­writ­ing exam­ples here, and osten­si­bly it’s ori­ented towards that, but don’t let that dis­uade you from pur­chas­ing this one. It’s beyond fan­tas­tic. I don’t use this term often, but if you are just start­ing out with writ­ing, this is a must-​​read.

Buy The Books

So those are the books that I have sit­ting next to me as we speak. I have to buy a copy of the If any of these sound inter­est­ing to you, and you’re not boy­cotting Amazon, please con­sider buy­ing the books through the links I’ve pro­vided here. It will help sup­port me writ­ing more posts like this one (although less obvi­ously com­mer­cially crass). I’ve applied for an Indie Books affil­i­ate but haven’t been approved yet, and will use that affil­i­ate in the future for this kind of thing in addi­tion to Amazon.

    Posted on:

    14 Responses

    1. I have (and have read parts of) the first two, and highly agree.

      The other three go on my list.

      One of my rec­om­men­da­tions on writ­ing books (not always SF/​F) is: “Beginnings, Middles, and Endings” by Nancy Kress. Excellent book!

      - yeff

      • Jeremiah Tolbert says:

        Thanks for the rec­om­men­da­tion. I will check that one out. I like Nancy’s work.

    2. John Joseph Adams says:

      Stephen King’s ON WRITING is pretty awesome.

    3. Jeremiah Tolbert says:

      I don’t know why I have never got­ten around to read­ing that one. I really should.

    4. Great list; I’ve only read 2 of the 5, and I’ll keep my eye out for the others.

      One book that I’ve found to be absolutely astound­ing is “Audition” by Michael Shurtleff. It’s osten­si­bly about act­ing, but really it’s about build­ing char­ac­ter, build­ing scenes and build­ing sto­ries. As with McKee’s book, every read brings across another lesson.

      • Jeremiah Tolbert says:

        You know, I bet my wife has that book! I’m going to ask her when she gets home. She’s an actress and has loads of books on the subject.

    5. I’ve read three of the five and the other two look like manda­tory reading.

      I’ve recently been pub­lished in the US with my first sci­ence fic­tion book — the link is:

      http://​www​.StrategicBookPublishing​.com/​S​c​i​e​n​c​e​F​i​c​t​i​o​n​a​n​d​A​l​t​e​r​n​a​t​e​H​i​s​t​o​r​y​.​h​tml

      However, and I’m no young­sterm I admit I still have a lot to learn.

      Cheers

      David Scholes

    6. Unfocused Me says:

      Thanks for the rec­om­men­da­tions. I haven’t read any of these yet, and I think I’ll start with the Knight and the McKee. FWIW, I agree that King’s On Writing is an excel­lent resource.

      • Jeremiah Tolbert says:

        Congrats on your pub­li­ca­tion, David.

        UM, I can’t rec­om­mend the McKee enough. I will have to check out King’s book now with all of these ster­ling recommendations.

    7. You gotta have plot! Lots and lots of plots! Couldn’t resist that — my apolo­gies! The plot needs to be well thought out and the char­ac­ters must be well-​​defined, but not the deter­ment of the story. The one tid­bit of advice I’ve heard in more than once is that “if it doesn’t move the story for­ward, delete it!”

    8. Those are all good books, and I’ll sec­ond the rec­om­men­da­tions of those and of Nancy Kress’s writ­ing books, too.

    9. […] Jeremiah Tolbert shares 5 Books on Writing and Science Fiction That Made Me a Better Writer. […]

    10. Grant Stone says:

      Second King’s On Writing. Great stuff. Don’t bother with Norman Mailer’s The Spooky art though.

      Interesting that you rate McKee so highly. I’ve had it sit­ting on my book­shelf for years, but I’ve been put off read­ing it from peo­ple in film cir­cles. But based on your rec­om­men­da­tion I’ll start read­ing it this week.

    11. Sicklinks says:

      […] Tolbert shares the five books that made him a bet­ter sci­ence fic­tion writer. Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social book­mark­ing sites where read­ers can share and […]

    Leave a Reply