Archive for April, 2009

A Serious Question for My Blog Readers

Posted on:

It’s a sim­ple ques­tion.  I’m look­ing for an angle on my blog­ging, and it’s often been sug­gested that I find prob­lems and solve them. So I ask those of you who already read me:

What are the prob­lems you’re strug­gling with, whether it be with writ­ing, or web design, or pho­tog­ra­phy, or any other subject?

I want my blog­ging work to be worth­while, and I want it to help peo­ple.  I really do like shar­ing what I know, what I’ve learned.   I may not have answers to your prob­lems, but I’ll try to find them, or point you to peo­ple who do.

I’ll pick one of the most insight­ful com­menters on this post between here and LiveJournal and send them a copy of the new anthol­ogy, Federations, edited by John Joseph Adams, and con­tain­ing sto­ries by Lois McMaster Bujold, George R.R. Martin, Anee McCaffrey, Alastair Reynolds, Robert Silverberg, and uh, me.

So, spill?

International Science Fiction Collection

Posted on:

Lavie Tidhar has long been one of my favorite authors, and we fre­quently pub­lished him at the Fortean Bureau.  He’s a fas­ci­nat­ing indi­vid­ual and it shows in his writ­ing, which is very often influ­enced by his grow­ing up in Israel.  I like exotic locales in my fic­tion, and Lavie has a way of mak­ing places on Earth itself seem exotic.

Which brings me to his new anthol­ogy, The Apex Book of World SF.

Lavie has put together a ros­ter of authors you have prob­a­bly never heard of before, and maybe a few that you have.  Writers from India, Thailand, China, Croatia, and more.   Sometimes we in the sci­ence fic­tion lit­er­ary cir­cles fail to real­ize that the genre extends past the bor­ders of the English-​​speaking world.  This book in a per­fect world would get a lot of atten­tion from us.

I often hear peo­ple won­der­ing when the next big move­ment will come along.  We had New Wave, and Cyberpunk.  I have sus­pected for some time that the next move­ment is going to come from sci­ence fic­tion authors for who English is a sec­ond lan­guage, if a lan­guage at all.

I’m look­ing for­ward to read­ing this one.  I hope you check it out. There’s even a World SF Blog that has been run­ning some great con­tent late.
You can order the anthol­ogy at the Apex Book Company Website.

Charlie Finlay Gives Away Books (with a catch)

Posted on:

Charlie Finlay is a great writer who taught me a ton about writ­ing back when I didn’t really deserve it.   He has a new fan­tasy book series launch­ing, set dur­ing the Revolutionary War, and the first book is called Patriot Witch.   I have really been look­ing for­ward to this.  Historical fan­tasy set in this time period is rare as far as I know, and cou­pling the period with a writer like Finlay is going to be a treat.

CCfinlay: You Say You Want A Revolution?

But what I really wanted to point out to you today was this inter­est­ing strat­egy he’s using to build buzz for the book.  He’s giv­ing out free early copies for the book, so long as you go and post a review on one of the mer­chant sites.  Then he’ll send you an advance copy of the next book, so long as you do the same. I sus­pect he is going to chain peo­ple all the way through the series this way.

I think it’s a clever way to get some men­tions out there. If I were him, I would have asked for blog posts as well, for read­ers with blogs, but maybe Amazon​.com reviews will have more of an impact on sales.  I’m not sure.

Charlie, like most newer nov­el­ists, has not much of a mar­ket­ing bud­get behind his book.  These days, mar­ket­ing falls on the shoul­ders of the writer more and more.  I col­lect strate­gies like these to offer to my clients as part of my web design series.  I’ll be watch­ing this one to see where it goes.

I wish I had time to take him up on the offer, but things are get­ting really hec­tic around here between look­ing for a job, free­lance, and Escape Pod.  And I’m also writ­ing again a bit.  Not enough time in the day, damn it.

The Week in Links: Photography, Design, and SF

Posted on:

Welcome to the all new links write-​​up posts.  I hope to bring you the week’s top finds each Friday in a com­pre­hen­sive post, sorted by inter­est.  There should be a lit­tle bit of some­thing here for every­one.  I’m putting this one behind a break because it is one long entry.  That’s what hap­pens when I con­sol­i­date these from daily into weekly I am afraid.
Continue read­ing ›

New Story Online: The Kansas Jayhawk vs. The Midwest Monster Squad (With Exciting Poster Illustration Action)

Posted on:

Who doesn’t love giant mon­sters ter­ror­iz­ing the land?  Who doesn’t love geeks who love giant mon­sters and crack­ing wise?  If you don’t, then you can skip this story.  If you do… read on.

This is prob­a­bly one of my most pop­u­lar sci­ence fic­tion sto­ries, and for what­ever rea­son, I’ve never got around to get­ting it put online.  With the spare time I have lately to work on my skillset, I decided to do a fun poster illus­tra­tion for the story and a hope­fully easy-​​to-​​read layout.

The story orig­i­nally appeared in the May 2005 issue of Interzone, edited by Andy Cox.   It’s my first print mag­a­zine sale.

So with­out fur­ther blath­er­ing, here’s the story and the illustration:

The Kansas Jayhawk vs. The Midwest Monster Squad by Jeremiah Tolbert.

Twitter Will Murder You While You Sleep

Posted on:

If you are vir­tu­ous, you have have lit­tle to fear from Twitter.  But if you screw up, it will cut you, man. It will cut you DEEP.    I will explain how I think this can eas­ily be avoided, but first, let’s talk about Twitter.  I swore I would never make a blog post about the “power of Twitter” but this is too fas­ci­nat­ing to pass up

In the after­math of the #ama­zon­fail  deba­cle, I am only just now com­ing to real­ize the ulti­mate power of Twitter and just how dan­ger­ous it can be to the sta­tus quo and those in posi­tions of power.  That power remains mostly untapped and com­pletely undi­rected, for now.

The scan­dal broke over the week­end.  I won’t go into detail, but let me sum­ma­rize by say­ing, basi­cally, a crap-​​ton of books by gay authors, on GLBT themes, etc  were delisted from search and from sales rank­ings.   I was dri­ving cross coun­try and missed the begin­ning, so when I tuned in on Monday, it was a bit bewil­der­ing.  I imag­ine that’s how Amazon’s man­age­ment felt on Monday morn­ing when they were briefed on the issue.

From my per­spec­tive, the issue was a per­fect storm of  issues– GLBT rights and pub­lish­ing.   As I move in writing/​publishing cir­cles,  the last cou­ple of days on my twit­ter feed have been one long angry, out­raged dis­cus­sion, with links, retweets, the whole deal.  It con­tin­ues as I type this.

Don’t mis­take my detached atti­tude here to be one of con­done­ment.  What hap­pened was bad for writ­ers, bad for pub­lish­ers, and as we have seen, very, very bad for Amazon.  I am how­ever ambivi­lent about ascrib­ing blame or malev­o­lence.  I’ve worked in large orga­ni­za­tions, and it’s very easy for me to believe that this entire prob­lem was the result of a bureau­cratic error.

In the infor­ma­tion void that existed on the week­end, many inten­tions were invented to explain.  Right-​​wingers had col­lab­o­rated to manip­u­late the sys­tem via tags.  Amazon had capit­u­lated to right-​​wingers and dropped the titles.  It was a pro­gram­ming error.  A mas­sive con­spir­acy of inter­net pranksters man­u­fac­tured it so that they could feed on the out­raged tears of  twit­ter users.  And so on.

Much like Nature abhors a vac­cum, the inter­net ahbors an absence of information.

Amazon’s lack of imme­di­ate response allowed the con­tro­versy to build to unprece­dented lev­els.   Rarely have I seen the inter­net move in one angry direc­tion so effec­tively.  It never would have moved this quickly in the time before Twitter.  Email, texts, none of them had the per­fect assem­bly of fea­tures and usabil­ity that Twitter does.

The equa­tion looks some­thing like this:

(Incredibly Easy Link Sharing + Social Networking + Tagging) X Programming Error/​Scandal/​Gaffe  = Internet Shitstorm of Epic Proportions

We’ve been see­ing this with peo­ple los­ing jobs via Twitter as well.  You tend to think, as a twit­ter user, that the world is small, lim­ited to your fol­low­ers.  But they fol­low oth­ers, and oth­ers fol­low them, and it’s easy to resend some­thing you said with a click, and… it’s Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon, only instead of being linked to the excel­lent star of such films as Footloose and Wild Things, you get fired and mocked by 30 mil­lion people.

Do some­thing bad, catch the atten­tion of Twitter, and don’t respond for sev­eral days.  This is a recipe for total and utter rep­u­ta­tion ani­hil­i­a­tion.

So how do you avoid this?  Well, nim­ble com­pa­nies should not be threat­ened by Twitter’s awe­some might.  The faster you fill the void of infor­ma­tion, the more quickly Twitter as a whole will move on to some­thing else.   It prob­a­bly doesn’t mat­ter what you say.  All you have to do is acknowl­edge it.  Say, We see the prob­lem. We don’t know what’s caus­ing it.  We’re on it.  Thank you. And then keep peo­ple updated.  The lack of response is as impor­tant as the mistake.

Larger com­pa­nies like Amazon face a big­ger prob­lem.  I sus­pect Amazon can’t decide what brand of toi­let paper to put in the employee bath­room with­out six­teen com­mit­tees and mas­sive exec­u­tive over­sight.   The peo­ple in power in these com­pa­nies tend to believe in out-​​dated ideas like “I shouldn’t have to work on the weekends.”

So, two things if you’re Amazon-​​big.  One–your rep­u­ta­tion doesn’t turn off on the week­ends. You need peo­ple mon­i­tor­ing it at all times thanks to the inter­net.  And Two– empower the peo­ple mon­i­tor­ing your rep­u­ta­tion to man­age it.

Sounds risky, huh?  Only Bezos should have that power!  Right?  That’s the kind of think­ing that will get you into an #ama­zon­fail scale mess.  Top-​​down man­age­ment method­olo­gies will not last in today’s cli­mate.   Twitter and the inter­net will eat such com­pa­nies alive.  If your sur­vival depends on the decision-​​making of one or a few wealthy elites who can’t be both­ered to check their email on Sunday, to call an emer­gency meet­ing or some­thing, then you are, roy­ally and truly fucked.

To sum­ma­rize:  pay atten­tion, respond quickly, and for god’s sake, set up an search feed track­ing your com­pany name.  If Comcast can respond to any tweet that men­tions their name, so can Amazon.

Or, ya know, we can all start shop­ping at Barnes & Noble or Powell’s or some other smaller inde­pen­dent chain.  We don’t really care.  Twitter as a whole loves get­ting angry.  Outrage, kit­tens with bad gram­mar, and porn  are the fuels in the engines of the inter­net. And the inter­net makes it just as easy to order a book from Mom & Pop Reseller as it is AmazonCo.  Brand loy­alty doesn’t really count for much, and in the face of con­tro­versy, it evap­o­rates pretty damned quickly.

The New Rules of Project Awesomeness

Posted on:

Here are the new roles I’ve pinned up beside my desk.

  1. No more bitch­ing and moan­ing online.   If you don’t have some­thing pos­i­tive to say, don’t say it at all.
  2. Pretend to be pos­i­tive until you are pos­i­tive.  I hear good things about “Fake it til you make it.” We’re gonna try that.  It is not my nat­ural ten­dency to see the pos­i­tive.  Change your nat­ural ten­dency. Hey, you learned to eat some veg­eta­bles, so this can’t be that hard.
  3. Nobody owes you any­thing, so don’t ever act like it.   You are not the cen­ter of the world.  You are not a unique snowflake.  No big deal.
  4. Try harder.  Fail.  Try even harder.  Failure is just a word for ‘learn­ing expe­ri­ence.’  It’s not some­thing you can “be.”
  5. Talent is just another word for skill.  It can be sharp­ened like any­thing else.
  6. You will not wake up one morn­ing and mag­i­cally be more awe­some.  You are good enough to do what­ever you want, but it isn’t going to come with­out tremen­dous work.
  7. You like work­ing.  So it all turns out okay in the end.
  8. You are not your job.  Jobs are clothes we wear, not who we are.
  9. Stay hum­ble if you do find suc­cess. Hubris is unat­trac­tive on fat guys.
  10. Laugh!  Life is about laugh­ter and joy, not sor­row and self-​​pity.  You have a sense of humor.  USE IT!

To those of you who I’ve frus­trated or upset with my atti­tudes lately–I will try harder. Thank you for stick­ing with me through my roller coaster of emo­tions.  I’m deter­mined to make it worth your while in the future.  I must be kinda awe­some for you to put up with it.  So I coin this attempt in self-​​improvement “Project Awesomeness.”

Project Awesomeness is now  in alpha release.   We’ll call it beta when I think I’ve installed half the rules/​features into who I am.   Then we’ll have a party. A big one.  With stream­ers and balloons.

The Madness and Genius of John Brown

Posted on:

I can still remem­ber the first time I ever saw an image of John Brown.

I’m ten years old, and we are tour­ing the Capitol build­ing in Topeka Kansas.  We have been learn­ing Kansas his­tory all year, all about Bloody Kansas and the found­ing of Topeka and the Nebraska-​​Kansas Act.  None of it means any­thing to me. The Capital build­ing smells funny and is full of weird old men who look like grand­fa­thers, wear­ing ugly brown suits.  It’s the mid-​​80s and polit­i­cal fash­ion in Kansas has not left the 1970s.   I want to climb the 296 steps to the top, to look out upon the city of my birth, but we are not allowed because they are reha­bil­i­tat­ing the old dome.  At that very moment, my father’s father is hang­ing from scaf­fold­ing some­where high above us and installing new windows.

Our tour enters the east wing, and there I see for the first time what is to become one of the most iconic paint­ings of my entire life, along­side works by Monet, Dali, and van Gough.  It depicts a giant of a man, with a long and flow­ing beard, mad­ness in his pierc­ing eyes, hold­ing a rifle in one hand and an open book, pre­sum­ably the bible in the other, stand­ing astride two fallen sol­diers.    Behind him Union and Confederacy forces clash.   On the Confederacy and the man’s left, flames fill the sky with dark clouds, and on his right, with the Union, a twister has come down from the sky like God’s own fin­ger.   I remem­ber nearly every detail of this paint­ing from that moment on.  But it is the eyes of John Brown, the man in the paint­ing, that never leave me.  Those mad, mad eyes.

They lec­ture us in school about John Brown, the abo­li­tion­ist.  His his­tory is framed as a fail­ure.  John Brown the abo­li­tion­ist set out to start an upris­ing among the slaves.  His clash here in Osawatomie where I write this is con­sid­ered by some to be the first bat­tle of the Civil War.    But he was tried and hung in Virginia before the war ever began, and in his spe­cific goals, he was indeed a failure.

I grew up think­ing of the man as an tragic com­i­cal fig­ure, a fool with a sad end.  A man who dreamed of doing some­thing amaz­ing and fail­ing at it.  A man who was mad as a hat­ter, because that is what my teach­ers said.  Madness was the thing I always asso­ci­ated with him.  He fright­ened me, with those eyes, and with his actions of the Pottawatomie Massacre.

But today, I vis­ited the John Brown Museum and I learned things that put John Brown in an entirely dif­fer­ent per­spec­tive for me.  He was many things, but I am not so sure he was a fool.

Most every­one famil­iar with Civil War his­tory is famil­iar with the inci­dent at Harper’s Ferry, in which John Brown unsuc­cess­fully  led an attack and failed to ini­ti­ate a slave revolt.  He was cap­tured and even­tu­ally hung by the state of Virginia.    The way the story of Harper’s Ferry was por­trayed to me in my school­ing at least was that it was a ter­ri­bly mis­guided attack, a fool­ish one, and that only an ego­ma­ni­a­cal mad­man would think such an attack could suc­ceed.  Another black eye was that the first casu­alty of the bat­tle was a freed black man (not among Brown’s men).    Brown’s life, like many of the men from the time, was full of a mix­ture of busi­ness suc­cess and fail­ures.  He tried many paths in mak­ing a career for him­self.  But when his sons were threat­ened by pro-​​slavery forces here in Osawatomie, he set out from back east to come and help pro­tect his fam­ily and help fight to make Kansas a free state.

At the time, “Border Ruffians” had gath­ered in the area, all pro-​​slavery men, mostly from Missouri, around Osawatomie.  They intended to attack and wipe out the abo­li­tion­ist set­tle­ment.   Brown and his fam­ily, act­ing in I guess what might be a pre­emp­tive retal­i­a­tion, attacked and mur­dered 5 men, hack­ing them to death with broadswords, not miles away from the place where I sit and type this entry.  This became known as the Pottawatomie Massacre, and it was used to vil­lify Brown in later years.  Certainly, it is hard to jus­tify these actions, but they must be under­stood in the con­text of the time.  Lawrence, my home town, was sacked by pro-​​slavery forces, and then burned to the ground dur­ing the Civil War by Quantrill and his men.  It was the com­mon belief among Kansans (and mostly true) that the pro-​​slavery forces would use vio­lence and any other means to ensure that Kansas became a slav­ery state (and I am happy to report that they failed).

Brown was not a great mil­i­tary leader, that much I know now.  His most suc­cess­ful bat­tle, here in Osawatomie, involved shoot­ing at raiders from the trees, out­num­bered 7 to 1, but his defense ulti­mately failed, he retreated, and Osawatomie was sacked and burned.    So his great­est suc­cess was a failure.

In America, we like a win­ner, and when it comes to mil­tiary action, Brown was not a win­ner.  But I learned today that as an intel­lec­tual, he was a man who was will­ing to take action when few oth­ers would.  John Brown not only believed and espoused the abo­li­tion­ist phi­los­o­phy.  He was deter­mined to take action.

Reading a famous bit of Brown’s writ­ing made me real­ize that he was no mad­man, but an ide­al­ist will­ing to take any action nec­es­sary to sup­port his ideals.  He was no blood thirsty killer either.  In this news­pa­per col­umn that was widely reprinted, he com­pares the pub­lic response to the round­ing up and sum­mary execution-​​style shoot­ing of then men from the Lawerence area for being Free State sup­port­ers to his free­ing of 11 slaves and the death of one slave owner.    Read  John Brown’s “Parallels” and tell me that those actions speak of an unhinged per­son.  The slan­der against his name and his cause existed even then, and have only con­tin­ued to this day.

It was a quote from Fredrick Douglass, a black leader from the time, that finally, irrev­o­ca­bly changed my opin­ion of the man who many claim started the Civil War:

Did John Brown fail? John Brown began the war that ended American slav­ery and made this a free Republic. His zeal in the cause of free­dom was infi­nitely supe­rior to mine. Mine was as the taper light; his was as the burn­ing sun. I could live for the slave; John Brown could die for him.”

Ordinarily we have the upmost respect in the U.S. for those will­ing to die for free­dom.  And yet some­how, I learned from the edu­ca­tional sys­tem that John Brown was a men­tally unbal­anced fool who failed at every­thing he did.  Because, I think, more than we like some­one who is com­mit­ted to pure ideals, we hate a loser.

John Brown was no fail­ure.  He did not live to see the impact of his actions take hold on the coun­try, but take hold they did.   Perhaps we can attribute his actions as the cause of the War, at least, one of many.  A hor­ri­ble war, but nec­es­sary, I believe, to begin the long and ongo­ing process of secur­ing the words and spirit of our Constitution and Bill of Rights.    John Brown saw that, and he gave his life for it.  He has noth­ing but my pro­found respect.

Now when I look at the pho­tographs and at the famous paint­ing by John Steuart Curry, and I look into those eyes, I do not see the mad­ness that was once sug­gested.  I look into those eyes and a see a fierce deter­mi­na­tion to truth and equal­ity.  It should only look like mad­ness to those who oppose such things.  It is a stare that should strike fear straight into the hearts of big­ots and racists every­where to this day.

On Handling Criticism.

Posted on:

Copyblogger recently posted an arti­cle on how to han­dle crit­i­cism. This is a sub­ject that, as a cre­ative per­son, I have spent a lot of time think­ing about and strug­gling with, so I thought I’d talk about their points tonight and exam­ine them from my own point of view.

1. Enjoy it.

Criticism isn’t always bad in my expe­ri­ence (although it def­i­nitely tends to have neg­a­tive con­no­ta­tions).  It’s mostly good for you, but some­times it leaves a bad taste in your mouth.  Basically, crit­i­cism is broc­coli.  I’ve never been one to enjoy broc­coli, and crit­i­cism is some­thing that you don’t nat­u­rally join.  Those with frag­ile self-​​esteem have a ten­dency to take any kind of crit­i­cism neg­a­tively.  The key is gen­er­ally to try and keep it imper­sonal. The crit­i­cism is not about you, it’s about the work, and remem­ber, you are not your work (that com­ment is directed at me as much as it is my gen­eral audi­ence, let me tell you…).

So yeah, I can agree with this point, if you can man­age it.  Remind your­self that crit­i­cism is an impor­tant com­po­nent of get­ting bet­ter, when it’s con­struc­tive.    And if’ it’s ter­ri­ble crit­i­cism, try and laugh about how bad it is.  I actu­ally find that the more hyper­bolic neg­a­tive crit­i­cism is, the fun­nier it is for me, and the eas­ier it is to enjoy it.

On the Escape Pod blog, we have one com­menter who never, ever says any­thing pos­i­tive.  Sometimes this com­menter is on-​​target, but the way this com­menter says every­thing is clas­sic Troll Class One.  I was irri­tated with it at first, but over time, I’ve come to find this com­menter pretty funny.  Their act never changes though.

2. Nobody’s right.

Yeah, every­thing is sub­jec­tive, blah blah blah.  This is per­haps true when we’re talk­ing about sub­jec­tive mat­ters, but when it comes to facts, that’s baloney.  Someone is right and some­one is wrong.  Generally, it is you that is wrong, and it is Nick Mamatas that is right.    In fact, that should be the main corol­lary to this point.  “Nobody’s right, except Nick Mamatas.”  You can dis­agree with this, but I don’t rec­om­mend that you actu­ally argue the point.  You will lose.

3. Some peo­ple just won’t get it.

Copyblogger makes the point that some peo­ple are “just idiots.”  This is true, but I would con­sider this an obser­va­tion of last resort.  If the crit­i­cism com­pletely misses the point, there are two pos­si­bil­i­ties (or more, but two basic ones).  One is that the per­son mak­ing the crit­i­cism has a read­ing com­pre­hen­sion below the level you wrote (is
“an idiot” is a bit strong).  The other pos­si­bil­ity is that you didn’t do a very good job of con­vey­ing it. Me, I always take crit­i­cism seri­ously and eval­u­ate it for pos­si­ble value.  Unless it’s full of gram­mar and spelling mis­takes.  Those are pretty easy to ignore, because, yeah, some peo­ple are idiots.  They make them­selves very easy to spot most of the time.  Except for stealth idiots, like Chance from Being There.  More on them some other time.

4. Look for a new idea.

I really like this point.  Examine crit­i­cism for an idea you’ve never had before.  I’ve failed to do this almost every time my work has received crit­i­cism when it comes to writ­ing.    I often get stuck in a think­ing rut and my ruts get so deep that it’s hard to see over the sides of them.  This is because I can be a real self-​​centered prick from time to time (hope­fully not very often these days).  As much as any­thing else, this point serves as a reminder to offer at least a mod­icum of respect to the ideas of oth­ers.  Just because you didn’t have the idea doesn’t mean it has no value.  (Again.  Talking to me here.)

5. Let it go.

This is the hard­est aspect of Copyblogger’s advice for me.   Some peo­ple let crit­i­cism roll off them like water off a duck’s back.  Criticism often sticks to me like a very well-​​aimed spit­ball.   I have a very dif­fi­cult time shak­ing it off even if I don’t believe it. This prob­lem prob­a­bly resides in a shaky self-​​esteem more than any­thing else.  I am eager at times to believe the neg­a­tive thigns said about my work and myself.    That’s a per­sonal prob­lem, but it is eas­ier said than done for some of us to just let it go.  I know enough to let my inabil­ity to let it go remain a per­sonal issue.  What you should rarely do, in my opin­ion, is respond to crit­i­cism that you can’t let go.    Down that path lies mad­ness and a dam­aged reputation.

People with unshak­able self-​​esteem and belief in them­selves are eas­ily the most suc­cess­ful peo­ple in cre­ative endeav­ors from my expe­ri­ence.   They don’t get knocked down by crit­i­cism and they def­i­nitely know how to let it go.  If I had to pick one per­son­al­ity trait that I would like to develop to make me a bet­ter cre­ative per­son, it would be a true and deep belief in myself.  I’m work­ing on it, but I know that it’s not always there, and so I have a ways to go.

I had some jus­ti­fi­ably harsh and unhappy crit­i­cism on some of my work wait­ing for me when I woke up this morn­ing.    I was let­ting it really get to me at first, until I stum­bled upon this post over at Copyblogger, and it reminded me of the lessons I have learned in the past.  I took what I could from it, dis­agreed with some of it (but under­stood the per­spec­tive of it), but ulti­mately decided that the best thing to do was to let it go and move on and try not to make the same mis­takes in the future in future work.

Obsessing over your mis­takes and your crit­i­cism doesn’t help.  That’s the most impor­tant les­son for me and arti­cles like this serve to help drive that les­son home again and again.

The Hidden Spring and the Abandoned Hog Farm

Posted on:

My step­fa­ther Mike dri­ves me out into the coun­try  to show off some dis­cov­er­ies he made while walk­ing through the woods look­ing for cast-​​off deer antlers.    He and an older man by the name of Chester often go look­ing for such things.

We drive nearly up to the Missouri bor­der and park in an area under con­trol for the Corps of Engineers.   Hills sur­round  a low field that has yet to be plowed under.  Corn stalks still stand here and there like sol­diers on the bat­tle­field at the end of the war, while oth­ers blow across the ground in the breeze.  Purple clover car­pets the soil beneath the stalks, good nitro­gen for when the farmer even­tu­ally does plow and plant for another season.

The sky is strung with low-​​hanging gray cot­ton clouds, thor­oughly obscur­ing the sun. It’s a wel­come change from the sunny bright weather of Colorado, actu­ally.  Overcast days are rare where I live now.  A sharp, cold wind blows, mak­ing me pull my coat around me tighter.  We walk down a muddy road.  Water is every­where, but it hasn’t been rain­ing much, so it seems to come out of nowhere, and I won­der aloud about it. Mike nods and leads me up the side of a hill.  Water trick­les slowly down the slope  through the grass which has become mat­ted down in places with the wet.  We fol­low the water up into a tree­line, step­ping among fallen logs until we come to a stone ridge at the top of the hill.  We move around along the ridge until we spot the source;  an old spring.

A half-​​circle of lime­stone pieces, fit together with no mor­tar, pre­ci­sion work that I become very famil­iar with through the rest of our explo­ration, has been set into the hill­side three feet deep.  the water half-​​fills the hole.  Someone, per­haps as much as a hun­dred years ago, found this tiny upwelling of fresh water, dug it out and rein­forced the walls with stone from the hill­side.  No one lives around here for miles, but that wasn’t always the case.  (More below the photo)

I take pho­tos, trim­ming away brush and debris, clean­ing up the scene as best I can.  The water is green with thick algae, and lichens and moss coat every­thing.  The grass and weeds have yet to grow back, although sky-​​blue wild­flow­ers have sprung up here and there beneath the trees.

Mike gives me a grin as if to say “you haven’t seen any­thing yet” and we set off back down the hill and along the muddy road, around a pond fed by yet another spring.  We walk below the earthen dam that holds back the water, and along­side a  field, fol­low­ing muddy tracks of a doe white-​​tailed deer that passed not more than a cou­ple of hours before us.  We find an old horse-​​drawn plow, rust-​​red in tall grass, the plow­share still bit­ing into the soil. The gears and levers still func­tion.  I pull them and mar­vel at how a 50+ year old plow can be still rel­a­tively intact.  All that it misses is the seat and chains to har­ness to the work horse.

From the plow, we fol­low the base of the large hill until Mike points out a dis­used wagon trail whichs cuts back and angles against the slope, climb­ing to the sum­mit a hun­dred feet or so above the pond and field.  The trail is steep on either side as if heavy wagon loads were carted up and down here until .  When we reach the top, it’s not hard to imag­ine what loads were brought up.

Among the thicket of young trees, maybe 30, 40 years old in places, some older, Mike has found a com­plex of 3 foot high lime­stone walls that fences in more than a football-field’s worth of space.  The walls show the same details and crafts­man­ship of the walls of the hid­den spring.  The stones are not cut of quar­ried.  They are field stones that have been gath­ered and care­fully fit together, tens of thou­sands of them.

First we exam­ine  a cut into the hill­side, a cel­lar almost, walled off with lime­stone as well, with some pale stones show­ing signs of hav­ing been exposed to intense heat.  Here, Mike thinks, was the smoke­house where the pork was hung and cured.   This was a hog farm once.  The walls seem­ingly hap­haz­ard were added to over time as the steadily wealth­ier owner added pens.  I dig around in the rub­ble around the smoke­house and find bits and pieces of old bot­tles and some porcelin.  Mike leans down to me and exclaims “Will you look at that!”  I look up and he’s found an old horse­hoe, rusted bent nails and all.

It’s a lucky horse­shoe,” I say.

Well, it is now,” Mike says.

Mike points out a small alcove of walls with a nar­row entry­way, not more than four feet by six feet, and explains that this is where they would have kept the boar away from the sows, let­ting him out only a few times a year to sire young.  It seems like a frus­trat­ing life for an ani­mal, to hear and smell beau­ti­ful women just on the other side of a wall, but only able to get to them so very rarely. We move on.

Peeking out from just behind the bare trees, I can see a soli­tary brick chim­ney stand­ing twenty feet into the air.  We explore the con­crete foun­da­tion which has heavy iron bolts set in to fas­ten the walls joists which have long since rot­ted away.  I kick away at the fallen leaves and find old roof shin­gles, cor­ru­gated alu­minum sid­ing, and rot­ting wooden floor­boards.    It’s impos­si­ble to look at all of this and not start ot pic­ture the peo­ple who lived here, to imag­ine their ani­mals.  I begin to won­der if they had a barn.  They clearly had a wagon drawn by horses.  I wan­der the grounds and sure enough, I find the buried foun­da­tions of another build­ing, small, but not far from the open­ing in the walls where the wagon trail led into the ruins.  This, I believe was the barn, where the horses were kept, and the walled area around it their yard.

How old is this place?  When did they leave?  How much money must they have had to have raised hun­dreds of hogs here?  The ques­tions the stones illicit are end­less.  We wan­der, trac­ing the out­lines of the farm, and I try to pic­ture it, try to travel back in time with my mind’s eye.  I imag­ine that the farm was first built in the late 1800s, per­haps by a civil war sol­dier home from the war, weary from the killing.   Weary of peo­ple, he buys a par­cel of land far away from the embry­onic towns of Northeast kansas.  It’s not ideal, but some instinct left over from the war instructs him to build his home and farm atop a large rise where he can see for miles around, see the river cut­ting through the hills and carv­ing steep banks below.  there’s not much hard­wood for build­ing, so he begins to fence in his prop­erty with piece of yel­low­stone that lit­ter the ground.  Perhaps he hires a cou­ple of hands to help errect his home, and he takes a young wife from one of the nearby rail­road towns, maybe even Osawatomie.   He pur­chases his first hogs and begins to raise ani­mals.  He plows a field below the hill and plants corn and wheat.  It’s hard work, but not as hard as killing men, there’s that much.

His wife gives birth to three sons and a daugh­ter, and it’s not long before they are put to work expand­ing the fences, build­ing more pens for the hogs.   They strip the hill bare of stones to make their fences, but they don’t sim­ply pile the rocks together loosely.  The hogs could push over poorly built walls–no, they fit the pieces together care­fully.  Sometimes they take a sledge to a piece to break it into smaller pieces, but mostly they use the pieces exactly as they are when they find them, sim­ply fit­ting them together with thought and patience.

The years go by in hard, ful­fill­ing work.  The farm pros­pers.  His daugh­ter and two sons move away to the nearby towns, marry, and raise fam­i­lies.  He is made a wid­ower when his wife suc­cumbs to a fever in the sum­mer, some tick­borne dis­ease.  The sec­ond son, the one for whom farm­ing had always seemed to be his fate, takes over on the farm after his father dies from pneu­mo­nia after a hard win­ter.  The son buries his father in a grave on the hill­side and sets a lime­stone into the ground to mark the spot. He is illiterate–his old man had never placed much stock in edu­ca­tion and did just fine with­out it–and so no words are etched into the marker.  The grave over­looks the acres that the old man has bought up with the growth of his farm and the lucra­tive sale of hogs and pork.

The son spends some of his inher­i­tance and builds a new house, this time with a con­crete foun­da­tion.   It’s small, enough room for a cou­ple of peo­ple to live com­fort­ably.  He mar­ries a woman, but they never have chil­dren.  The depres­sion comes, and things get harder.  Few can afford to buy his pork and hogs.  Eventually, they sell the land to a nearby rancher and move to the city to try their for­tunes there.

And my crys­tal ball goes hazy.  I won­der if there are descen­dants some­where who were raised on sto­ries of life on the old hog farm, but who have never seen what I have seen, never vis­ited their ancestor’s lands.    My fam­ily were farm­ers, not so many gen­er­a­tions ago, but I don’t know the lands they worked.  Arkansas some­where, I am told.

With the ruins explored, Mike and I walk back to the truck in the driz­zling rain.   I feel today as if I have some­how reached back into time and touched the life of some face­less stranger.  History is a funny thing, and I feel closer to it here than I do any­where else.  I don’t know why.