-
Colleen talks about ideal word lengths for novels
-
This sounds very nice. I need to experiment with it.
-
Acoustic mirrors used to listen for approaching aircraft or boats before Radar. This has got to go into a fantasy novel.
-
“Readability is a browser bookmarklet (sort of like a bookmark on steroids). You can install Readability by visiting the Readability setup page”
-
A few of these are actually new to me.
-
continuous integration.
-
Decrease load times, merge and minify files.
-
This guy’s book “the 4 Hour Workweek” is a total pipedream (bordering on scam) but this post is fun and interesting
-
The British version was fantastic, but Harvey Keitel was not nearly as compelling as his British counterpart.
Archive for March, 2009
Postmortem: What the hell was #futureJer?
My 3 month long experiment in 140 character fiction posts ended on Sunday. You can read my serial fiction #futureJer on the Thaumatrope website here. The premise was pretty simple: I attempted to imagine my life 2 years into the future if our economy doesn’t get any better. It’s fairly grim, but has a touch of hope to it too. The cast were barely fictional versions of my family and friends, and it takes place in rural Kansas.
The Genesis of a Twitter Serial
Back before I was actually laid off, but knew the threat was looming, I was experiencing a lot of anxiety. On a whim, I decided to imagine how bad things could get to externalize my fears, and I started twittering this in the form of #futureJer. Within a couple of days, Nathan Lilly, the editor of Thaumatrope, direct messaged me and offered to pay me to do what I was already doing, at pro rates no less. It was an easy decision to make.
Postmortem
I never had any intention of telling a story when I started out doing this, but once I was offered money, I had to give it an arc. I introduced the elements of the pregnancy and the growing violence to develop the drama. I was happiest about the project when I was simply imagining our lives as essentially subsistence farmer/hunters. I find something deeply compelling about a life without work, where you simply grow your own food, maintain your own home, and enjoy life. I think we’re hardwired more for the hunter/gatherer or farmer life more than we are for working in offices.
The tone probably got even darker when I was actually laid off at the end of January. I sat down a few days later and wrote the entire month of February in an afternoon, plotting out the remainder. I suspect the final bit felt slightly more cohesive than the bits that led up to it.
Overall, it was an interesting experiment in writing on the fly, and hopefully I didn’t screw it up too much. Also, I hope it doesn’t turn from fiction to reality, because I don’t actually know how to build or repair wind turbines or castrate bulls, although I’m willing to learn if someone wants to teach me!
links for 2009-03-03
Photo: Spinthrift
Photo: On the Dunes
Read: Lamentation by Ken Scholes
Full disclaimer: Ken is a great guy, someone I consider a wonderful friend. One of my regrets about not living in Portland (despite having wanted to for about 8 years) is that I don’t get to hang out with him and his wife more often. Ken’s success is well-earned. We first met at a Norwescon a few years ago, and Ken was just getting started again seriously with his writing. He’d sold a few stories, not many. We hit it off and I asked him to send along something to the Fortean Bureau, which he did, and we bought it. And a couple of others. I loved Ken’s short stories. I suppose that is to temper my comments coming next.
I enjoyed Lamentation. However, for me at least, it suffers from overhype. It’s a good book, but so much energy was poured into calling it a great book that I had unrealistically high expectations. I don’t mean to damn it with faint praise, and I’ve thought long and hard about whether I wanted to admit that I didn’t froth over the book, because I want nothing more than to see Ken succeed. So listen, I did like the book. I do recommend that you read it. You are liable to love it.
Anyway–It’s very interesting on several levels to me. Ken’s very good at what he does, so let me expound on how and why.
One aspect that I really like is that it’s a breezy kind of epic fiction. I read the book in 2 days. I rarely get to cut through a book that fast (although this is the first book that I’ve read since being laid off). The book rarely dragged which is rare for this kind of fantasy for me.
A lot has been said about the world building, which I started out disliking and slowly grew to find more interesting over time. It felt at first to me that not enough logic and forethought went into the combination of echos of our world’s culture. As the book develops, I see that more is going on, and I became more interesting. I really liked how the history of what had happened echoed through the events of the book. I think Ken handles this excellently. World building can easily bog down this kind of fantasy. Look at Tolkien, who I consider an interminable bore when it came to all his descriptions of landscapes and Elvish history and singing. Ken fleshes out his world, but does it deftly, much like everything else he does in the book.
I do think the book suffers a little from too many points of view. I found the concept of many of the characters interesting, but their insights rarely struck home with me. I spent much of the book waiting for a character who would sink his teeth into me like Tyrion from Martin’s books. However–Martin’s books are like 5 times longer and I don’t think this is a matter of skill so much as it is a matter of time. Ken’s got 4 more books to do this, and I’m definitely going to give him a chance to develop these characters even further.
Okay, I’m entering into spoilers territory next. Behind the cut.



![bg15_320a[1]](http://www.jeremiahtolbert.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/bg15_320a1-210x300.jpg)