Archive for March, 2009

links for 2009-​​03-​​04

Posted on:

Postmortem: What the hell was #futureJer?

Posted on:

My 3 month long exper­i­ment in 140 char­ac­ter fic­tion posts ended on Sunday.  You can read my ser­ial fic­tion #future­Jer on the Thaumatrope web­site here.  The premise was  pretty sim­ple: I attempted to imag­ine my life 2 years into the future if our econ­omy doesn’t get any bet­ter.  It’s fairly grim, but has a touch of hope to it too.  The cast were barely fic­tional ver­sions of my fam­ily and friends, and it takes place in rural Kansas.

The Genesis of a Twitter Serial

Back before I was actu­ally laid off, but knew the threat was loom­ing, I was expe­ri­enc­ing a lot of anx­i­ety.  On a whim, I decided to imag­ine how bad things could get to exter­nal­ize my fears, and I started twit­ter­ing this in the form of #future­Jer.  Within a cou­ple of days, Nathan Lilly, the edi­tor of Thaumatrope, direct mes­saged me and offered to pay me to do what I was already doing, at pro rates no less.  It was an easy deci­sion to make.

Postmortem

I never had any inten­tion of telling a story when I started out doing this, but once I was offered money, I had to give it an arc.  I intro­duced the ele­ments of the preg­nancy and the grow­ing vio­lence to develop the drama.  I was hap­pi­est about the project when I was sim­ply imag­in­ing our lives as essen­tially sub­sis­tence farmer/​hunters.  I find some­thing deeply com­pelling about a life with­out work, where you sim­ply grow your own food, main­tain your own home, and enjoy life.  I think we’re hard­wired more for the hunter/​gatherer or farmer life more than we are for work­ing in offices.

The tone prob­a­bly got even darker when I was actu­ally laid off at the end of January.  I sat down a few days later and wrote the entire month of February in an after­noon, plot­ting out the remain­der.  I sus­pect the final bit felt slightly more cohe­sive than the bits that led up to it.

Overall, it was an inter­est­ing exper­i­ment in writ­ing on the fly, and hope­fully I didn’t screw it up too much.  Also, I hope it doesn’t turn from fic­tion to real­ity, because I don’t actu­ally know how to build or repair wind tur­bines or cas­trate bulls, although I’m will­ing to learn if some­one wants to teach me!

Photo: Spinthrift

Posted on:

The wind was blow­ing so hard that you could see a kind of soft haze at the edges of dunes. It made every­thing feel slightly ethe­real and imper­ma­nent. It also resulted in me get­ting sand in every­thing, includ­ing my teeth.

Photo: Spinthrift

Photo: On the Dunes

Posted on:

An exper­i­ment in low angles.

On the Dunes

Read: Lamentation by Ken Scholes

Posted on:

Full dis­claimer:  Ken is a great guy, some­one I con­sider a won­der­ful friend.  One of my regrets about not liv­ing in Portland (despite hav­ing wanted to for about 8 years) is that I don’t get to hang out with him and his wife more often.  Ken’s suc­cess is well-​​earned.  We first met at a Norwescon a few years ago, and Ken was just get­ting started again seri­ously with his writ­ing.  He’d sold a few sto­ries, not many.  We hit it off and I asked him to send along some­thing to the Fortean Bureau, which he did, and we bought it.  And a cou­ple of oth­ers.  I loved Ken’s short sto­ries.  I sup­pose that is to tem­per my com­ments com­ing next.

I enjoyed Lamentation.  However, for me at least, it suf­fers from over­hype.  It’s a good book, but so much energy was poured into call­ing it a great book that  I had unre­al­is­ti­cally high expec­ta­tions.  I don’t mean to damn it with faint praise, and I’ve thought long and hard about whether I wanted to admit that I didn’t froth over the book, because I want noth­ing more than to see Ken suc­ceed.  So lis­ten, I did like the book. I do rec­om­mend that you read it.  You are liable to love it.

Anyway–It’s very inter­est­ing on sev­eral lev­els to me.  Ken’s very good at what he does, so let me expound on how and why.

One aspect that I really like is that it’s a breezy kind of epic fic­tion.  I read the book in 2 days.  I rarely get to cut through a book that fast (although this is the first book that I’ve read since being laid off).  The book rarely dragged which is rare for this kind of fan­tasy for me.

A lot has been said about the world build­ing, which I started out dis­lik­ing and slowly grew to find more inter­est­ing over time.  It felt at first to me that not enough logic and fore­thought went into the com­bi­na­tion of echos of our world’s cul­ture.  As the book devel­ops, I see that more is going on, and I became more inter­est­ing.  I really liked how the his­tory of what had hap­pened echoed through the events of the book.   I think Ken han­dles this excel­lently.  World build­ing can eas­ily bog down this kind of fan­tasy.  Look at Tolkien, who I con­sider an inter­minable bore when it came to all his descrip­tions of land­scapes and Elvish his­tory and singing.  Ken fleshes out his world, but does it deftly, much like every­thing else he does in the book.

I do think the book suf­fers a lit­tle from too many points of view.  I found the con­cept of many of the char­ac­ters inter­est­ing, but their insights rarely struck home with me.  I spent much of the book wait­ing for a char­ac­ter who would sink his teeth into me like Tyrion from Martin’s books.  However–Martin’s books are like 5 times longer and I don’t think this is a mat­ter of skill so much as it is a mat­ter of time.  Ken’s got 4 more books to do this, and I’m def­i­nitely going to give him a chance to develop these char­ac­ters even further.

Okay, I’m enter­ing into spoil­ers ter­ri­tory next.  Behind the cut.

Continue read­ing ›

Photo: Sun Dunes

Posted on:

Mmm. Tasty tasty lens flare. It’s prob­a­bly bad for my cam­era to shoot straight into the sun, so I don’t do it often, but the results can be awe­some sometimes.

Photo:  Sun Dunes