Jeremiah Tolbert

Writer | Photographer | Web Designer

Roundbottom Research Publication

Harkening back to my post about crazy uncon­ven­tial zine ideas, and all this talk and thought about relaunch­ing the Fortean Bureau, has led me to give some seri­ous thought to try­ing some­thing very very different.

Roundbottom is my core project right now, but I have a strong desire to launch a new ‘zine. At the very least, I am going to pub­lish a few sto­ries in the Fortean Bureau for­mat, but what if… what if I cre­ated a meta pub­li­ca­tion like the Surreal Guide to Botany or the Disease Guide from a year or so back–but as a kind of naturalist’s research pub­li­ca­tion.  Nothing stuffy and dry like real sci­en­tific mag­a­zines, but basi­cally pay­ing other peo­ple to write posts like Dr. Roundbottom.  I’d accept sub­mis­sions from both artists and writ­ers. I’ll pro­vide a forum for artists and writ­ers to team up, if they want to make a joint pro­duc­tion of an article/piece.

Art would be allowed in any for­mat.  Not every­one has to do the pho­tog­ra­phy thing that I’m doing.  But the basic idea behind all of this is that each arti­cle is writ­ten by another nat­u­ral­ist in their own world, sim­i­lar or dif­fer­ent to Dr. Roundbottom, but at least pass­ably steampunk.

To start, I’d offer $50 a post (not longer than 2000 words) for the writ­ing and $50 for the art.  You’d be free to sell both any­where, and we will pro­vide a link to sell prints at your print store for artists.   We’d have an option to pay more at the end of the year to pub­lish a print edi­tion of the research notes.

Finally, and I’d be doing the same, you have to allow–and I’m not sure how to legally for­mal­ize this–references to be made to your work and char­ac­ters in other submissions/posts.  For instance, Dr. Roundbottom him­self might ref­er­ence your paper and link to it while talk­ing about some­thing sim­i­lar in his world.  And you’ll be able to do the same with Roundbottom.  This kind of shar­ing isn’t cov­ered under any kind of Creative Commons license that I know of, so per­haps I would need some odd con­tract legal­ize.  I should talk to the Creative Commons peo­ple and see if they have suggestions.

Would any­one sub­mit to some­thing like this?  I’m basi­cally think­ing about the com­ments that hap­pen already on Roundbottom and for­mal­iz­ing a way for writ­ers and artists to par­tic­i­pate in this fash­ion and get paid for it. I under­stand that it would be dif­fi­cult to sell any writ­ing writ­ten directly for htis project to any­thing else, so that’s one flaw that i have to con­sider.  Please pro­vide your thoughts and com­ments!  Would you sub­mit some­thing to this kind of pub­li­ca­tion?  What rules do you think would need to be made?

Tagged as: , , ,

5 Responses »

  1. I think this is an awe­some idea, and yes, I would love to sub­mit sto­ries to this type of pub­li­ca­tion. I also think it would still work with the Fortean Bureau name (it is a good name and has a long estab­lished rep­u­ta­tion). It’s as sim­ple as chang­ing the guideline’s “what we are look­ing for.” It is def­i­nitely akin to the Thackery T. Lambshead Pocket Guide to Eccentric and Discredited Diseases (which is great, BTW).

    In regards to the shar­ing of char­ac­ters and con­cepts: just make this part of the “rights” sec­tion of the con­tract. If peo­ple do not like this kind of cross-pollinated pub­li­ca­tion envi­ron­ment, then it is not a ‘zine they should sub­mit to. It’s true that sell­ing this type of fic­tion to other mar­kets would be more chal­leng­ing, but that is why I think there should be a pay­ment incen­tive. Let me explain: first, I think there should be two sec­tions of the site; one that is the idea you are talk­ing about here and another that is “other tales,” which is the same type of fic­tion you were pub­lish­ing before. Pay the $50 rate for the unique fic­tion that will become the true high­light and sig­na­ture fea­ture of the mag­a­zine. Pay less (say $35) for the other type of fic­tion. Another incen­tive is to cre­ate “best of” antholo­gies each year that can be eas­ily done through lulu.com

    On another note, I just dis­cov­ered your clockpunk.com site last night and I was going to Twitter you today and tell you how seri­ously cool the site is!

  2. Sounds like fun!

    Yeah, in many ways it’s a shared uni­verse project where peo­ple are world build­ing together. Controlling how the world build­ing is shared between writ­ers might need to be part of the edi­to­r­ial process, like it would be for a shared-world anthology’s edi­tor. You may need to review arti­cles before they are posted to make sure they don’t need approval from another writer before being used, but only if they impact on another person’s orig­i­nal invention.

    I sus­pect a few things will help hook read­ers. One being the inven­tive­ness, whimsy, and pure fun of the arti­cles. Two being the cool­ness of the visual design and art. Three being any ongo­ing story lines that will make peo­ple want to read the next issue to see how they pro­ceed. I could see this being a really fun fic­tional journal!

  3. I love leav­ing com­ments on Round bot­tom and I can do a quick note or go out of my way to put together a octo­pus bush but at the moment I don’t think I’d cre­ate my own stuff because I’ve got so many other projects. In order to do so I’d have to con­sciously decide to do it, rather than with respond­ing, where I just have to be inspired.

    I would say per­haps there isn’t a mar­ket for this until such time that the com­ments on Roundbottom get so busy that they’re unwieldy. I hope that’s use­ful feedback.

  4. Fortean phe­nom­ena are near and dear to my heart. I would write arti­cles for this!

  5. This could be an inter­est­ing project for­mat. I doubt I’d con­tribute (because my writ­ing isn’t good enough) but I’d be very inter­ested to watch it working.

Leave a Response